Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the article is to investigate the system of functioning of the Ukrainian auteur cinematography in the 1960-80s, in the difficult Soviet times of the individuality and spirit oppression of the Ukrainian people as a nation in general and it is based on a comprehensive analysis and available scientific datas and sources. The relation of the auteur theory to the Ukrainian cinema of the Soviet period is going to be found out and also to investigate the development of prominent Ukrainian figures in the cinema and the peculiarities of their creative self-expression. Research Methodology. It is based on experiences caused by the problems and phenomena of modern screen art. To solve the set tasks, the following methods have been used: general scientific, analysis and synthesis, as well as philological, textological, structural and comparative, historical methods. The works of art history of the achievements in the Ukrainian and world cinema are being studied. The creative works of outstanding Ukrainian directors, screenwriters, cameramens and actors have been analyzed. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the features and manifestations of the author's cinema of Ukraine in the 1960–1980s, completely unexplored materials, scientific works have a lot of evidence about the existence of authorship in Ukrainian cinema, therefore the specificity of the art of this period, as well as external factors affecting the directors during the creation of copyright works. The legal system of the period, and the peculiarities of copyright in Soviet times, are analyzed, the influence of political and juridical factors on the manifestation of the author's theory in Ukrainian cinema as a whole has been clarified. Conclsions. In the course of the study, the prerequisites and reasons for the emergence of the author's concept of its ethnic and national peculiarity, among the Soviet times traditional canons have been revealed. During the period of poetic cinema, a large number of Ukrainian literature works saw the light. ...

Pamphlets of M. Hvylyoviy's is an effective journalistic materials, the functional distinction between the author and the image of the author on the basis of them helps to understand the features of journalistic communication. The article aims to trace the pamphlets of M. Hvylyoviy's the category of the author and the image of the author and to determine their functions in the process of journalistic communication; the goal is to show the opinions of scholars regarding the author and the image of the author; to compare definition of these concepts in philology and jurnalistilor; to distinguish between the pamphlets of the characteristics of the author and the author; to explain the functions of the two categories in journalism.Category of authorship in the theory of journalism is more common with its definitions in the literature, timing the author, the image of the author, the image of the narrator, the researchers use both spheres of creative activity. In the literature highlight the concept of «the creator of the artwork» as the subject of artistic activity, «the image of the author» — shows the artist's own account in his work, «the artist-creator», the interpreter of life events, the prophet and the mouthpiece of tradition and «the way of the storyteller» — as a contingent, and not a real author-creator. Artistic and journalistic works of different nature, which affects the features of the functioning in them of the author and the image of the author. Artwork drawn to your imaginary world, is an aesthetic system, autonomous in relation to the real world of the reader, the artist deliberately departs from verisimilitude, he wants to establish high aesthetic ideals. Journalistic text represents reality, this documentary system, important for the reader documento being played. Satirist-publicist analyzes the reality, appeals to the rational sphere of the reader, helps to understand the mental negative, activates the public; the category of theauthor is exactly is the actual narrative terms. The image of a pamphleteer emotional sensations sent to the recipient, it acts into the quasi-fictional the narrative field, provokes laught. Hvylyoviy-pamphleteer — is the polymath, politician art critic, pamphleteer embodies the jester, he mocks, criticizes and makes fun of everyone and everything. Communication potential of the pamphlets is determined by the author's rational comprehension of reality and the negative emotional impact of the image of the pamphleteer. ; Памфлеты Н. Хвылевого — эффективные журналистские материалы, функциональное разграничение категорий автор и образ автора на их примере помогает осознать особенности публицистической коммуникации. Сатирик-публицистанализирует реальную действительность, апеллирует к рациональной сфере читателя, помогает постигнуть умом отрицательное; категория автор представляет конкретно-фактический план повествования. Образ памфлетиста устремлен кэмоциональному ощущению реципиента, действиями в условно-вымышленном поле повествования он провоцирует смех. Хвылевый-памфлетист — это эрудит, политик, искусствовед, который логически рассуждает о негативной действительности, образ автора наделен чертами шута, он критикует и высмеивает всех и все. Коммуникативный потенциал памфлетов определяется авторским рациональным осмыслением реальности и эмоциональным влиянием образа памфлетиста. ; Памфлети М. Хвильового — ефективні журналістські матеріали, функціональне розмежування категорій автор та образ автора на їх основі допомагає усвідомити особливості публіцистичної комунікації. Сатирик-публіцист аналізує реальну дійсність, апелює до раціональної сфери читача, допомагає розумово осягнути негативне; категорія автор представляє конкретно-фактичний план оповіді. Образ памфлетиста скерований до емоційного відчуття реципієнта, діями в умовно-вигаданому полі оповіді він провокує сміх. Хвильовий-памфлетист — це ерудит, політик, мистецтвознавець, що логічно розмірковує про негативну дійсність, образ автора наділений рисами блазня, який критикує і висміює всіх і все. Комунікаційний потенціал памфлетів визначається авторським раціональним осмисленням реальності та емоційним впливом образу памфлетиста.

У статті розглянуто вплив політичних подій на становлення та розвиток українських гімназій. Висвітлено аспекти освітньої діяльності академіка М. Кравчука. Показано внесок ученого в обстоювання інтересів національної школи. ; The author considers impact of political events on becoming and development of Ukrainian gymnasia. The aspects of academician Kravchuk's educational activity are elucidated in the article. It is shown scientist's contribution to defending the interests of national school.