Suchergebnisse

Zlatko Topčić has built the identity of a novelist who openly tackles new techniques and literary procedures in the wake of postmodern ways of writing. This is supported by the novels created during and after the last war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the shadows and traumas of the war are deep in the elements of the text, and the characters are caught in its whirlwind in different ways, prisoners of traumatic conditions even in the time when the storm of events subsides, but remains a long sediment of painful experiences. This text aims to show how a great historical event - the Sarajevo assassination - is artistically transposed in the novel 6/28/1914 (novel, revision), and how the fate of Bosnia and Herzegovina during the war in the period 1992-1995 can be traced through its outlines. With a collection of characters, historical and fictional, narrative organization of space and time, intertextuality, and an ironic relationship with metanarratives, Topčić creates a text as a product of personal stories from which a novelistic mosaic of historical events is created.

The authors in the work deal with the trial process against members of the Young Bosnia for the assassination of the Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie Chotek in Sarajevo 1914. That issue attends scientific and lay public attention over the hundred years. Authors divided their article into few parts. After the introductory remarks they explain conditions in the country before the assassination, especially problem of the Bosnia and Herzegovina's annexation and its ratification within the Austro-Hungarian legislation. After that, they remind on the ultimatum that the Dual Monarchy referred to Serbia, which was not accepted, but which 'caused' the First World War. The main part of the work is dedicated to the criminal proceeding against the Young Bosnians. They analyze criminal procedure in that time, behavior of the participants, especially president of the judicial council, and defense attorneys, which was shameful, except the defense of the Dr. Rudolf Cistler. Consequently, he had borne numerous negative consequences after the judgment. ; Autori u radu razmatraju suđenje pripadnicima Mlade Bosne za ubistvo austrougarskog prestolonaslednika Franca Ferdinanda i njegove supruge Sofije Hotek u Sarajevu 1914. godine, budući da to pitanje i nakon više od sto godina zaokuplja pažnju stručne i laičke javnosti. Autori su rad podelili u više celina, jer je nakon uvodnih razmatranja bilo nužno prikazati uslove u državi pre atentata, a prevashodno problem aneksije Bosne i Hercegovine i njene ratifikacije u okviru austrougarske legislative. Nakon toga su u kratkim crtama podsetili na ultimatum koji je Dvojna monarhija uputila Srbiji, koji nije prihvaćen, posle čega je došlo do izbijanja Prvog svetskog rata. Centralni deo rada autori su posvetili krivičnom postupku protiv Mladobosanaca, analizirajući tadašnji postupak, ponašanje učesnika, a pogotovo predsednika sudećeg veća i branilaca okrivljenih, gde je jedina hvale vredna odbrana pripadala dr Rudolfu Cistleru, usled čega je snosio mnogobrojne negativne posledice nakon okončanja postupka.

This article analyzes the contested remembrance of the assassination of Habsburg Archduke Franz Ferdinand by Serbian radical Gavrilo Princip in 1914 in Sarajevo. I place the politics of the assassination centennial commemoration in the context of Serbian and Bosnian contemporary anxieties about their respective ontological insecurities. In Serbia, these anxieties centre on Serbia's fear of losing its international reputation as a state that was seen as historically generous and self‐sacrificing and a victim of historical injustice at the hands of great powers. In Bosnia, anxieties revolve around its persistently unresolved international status, failure to create any cohesive post‐war Bosnian identity, and deep internal ethnic divisions. The article explores ways in which the memory of the 1914 assassination is utilized for contemporary memory‐building purposes in both Serbia and Bosnia, as part of a larger narrative of state‐building, in which both states see themselves as "indispensable nations" that cracked open the historical arc of the twentieth century. The article demonstrates the profound anxiety historical commemorations provoke in internationally insecure states and illustrates ways in which states can respond.

'This paper analyzes La Nación's reporting of the assassination of Archduke Franz-Ferdinand in the week following the event. Analysis identifies the narrative components to these assassination stories, including geographical imaginaries and the places and networks of news production. Particular attention is paid to the mediatized ritual of mourning and succession that takes place in the capital cities with which La Nación's Buenos Aires readers are networked. Analysis is facilitated by some comparison with the coverage of the same event in The Los Angeles Times and The New Zealand Herald (Auckland). La Nación shared copy and sources with these and other newspapers, and printed similar stories about the assassination, but it cultivated its own local readership and its own ideas of citizenship in the wider world. Each editor imprinted his readers as moral citizens of the world, authorizing them to participate in the events as mourners, activists and compassionate observers, but also preconditioning the ways they can imagine assassination and the interactions of the diplomatic world. Analysis reveals expected roles in international affairs for citizens of world cities, which are conveyed as moral lessons and tales, wrapped in imagined communities stretching across the globe, but actualized locally.' (author's abstract)

In dem Artikel wird die Aufmerksamkeit auf ein Dokument gelenkt, in dem Hinweise auf einen möglichen russischen Hintergrund der Ermordung des österreichischen Thronfolgers Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand und dessen Ehefrau am 28. Juni 1914 in Sarajevo enthalten sind. Das fragliche Dokument stammt aus der Feder des Hauptorganisators dieses verhängnisvollen Mordanschlags, des Chefs des serbischen militärischen Geheimdiensts, Oberst Dragutin Dimitrijević-Apis. Geschrieben wurde es im Frühjahr 1917, als Dimitrijević-Apis angeklagt war, einen weiteren Mordanschlag organisiert zu haben, diesmal auf den serbischen Regenten Aleksandar. Dimitrijević-Apis legt dar, er habe die endgültige Entscheidung zur Ermordung von Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand erst gefasst, als ihm der russische Militärattaché in Belgrad, Oberst Viktor Artamanov (oder Artamonov in anderen Quellen), versichert hatte, Russland werde Serbien im Falle eines österreichischen Angriffs nicht im Stich, d.h. nicht ohne militärische Unterstützung lassen. ; The main purpose of the present note is to draw attention to a document that contains hints of a possible Russian background to the assassination of the successor to the Austrian throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his wife on 28 June 1914 in Sarajevo. This document was written by the main organizer of this disastrous murder, the chief of the Serbian military secret service, Colonel Dragutin Dimitrijević-Apis, in 1917, when Dimitrijević-Apis was accused of having organized another such attempt on the Serbian regent Aleksandar. Dimitrijević-Apis writes that he made the final decision to organize the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand only after he had been assured by the Russian military attaché in Belgrade, Colonel Viktor Artamanov, that Russia would not leave Serbia without military support in case of an Austrian attack. ; Основная цель настоящей заметки — обратить внимание исследователей на документ, в котором содержится намёк на возможное тайное участие России в убийстве наследника австрийского престола эрцгерцога Франца Фердинанда и его супруги 28 июня 1914 г. в Сараеве. Этот документ был написан в 1917 г. основным организатором фатального убийства — главой сербской военной тайной разведывательной службы полковником Драгутином Димитриевичем (Аписом) в то время, когда он был обвинен в организации очередного подобного покушения на сербского принца-регента Александра. Димитриевич-Апис пишет, что он принял окончательное решение об убийстве эрцгерцога Франца Фердинанда только после того, как был заверен российским военным атташе в Белграде полковником Виктором Артамановым (известным также как Артамонов) в том, что Россия не оставит Сербию без военной поддержки в случае австрийского нападения.