Fettered' and 'Unfettered' Capitalism in J.A. Schumpeter's Concept of Tax State and Economic Development – Issues in Banking Perspective
In: Oeconomia Copernicana, Band 7(1), Heft 23-33, S. 2015
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oeconomia Copernicana, Band 7(1), Heft 23-33, S. 2015
SSRN
In: Young Scientists Revue, (ed.) Stefan Hittmar, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina, Forthcoming
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: JMIR Research Protocol 2019, Band 8, Heft 3
SSRN
In: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Heft 532, S. 144-154
ISSN: 2392-0041
In: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, Band 2, Heft 328
ISSN: 2353-7663
The term "Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)" has been increasingly used for over a decade. The RRI concept is not currently well defined. The theory of RRI is not developed enough and there are still conceptual divergences. This paper introduces the issue of Responsible Research and Innovation and addresses the following key questions: How do we define RRI? Where do we stand in terms of understanding the RRI dimensions presented in literature? What is the role of RRI in the university technology transfer activity? The study is based on literature search on the Scopus (www.scopus.com), EBSCO (www.ebsco.com), Google Scholar (scholar.google.com) and Google Books (books.google.com) databases to obtain articles published in peer reviewed journals, related to the concept of RRI and technology transfer. The search terms (for title and topic) were: responsible innovation, responsible research and innovation, RRI, technology transfer. Critical analysis of the state of knowledge allowed to propose a set of seven conceptual dimensions (inclusion, anticipation, responsiveness, reflexivity, sustainability, care and economic) of the Responsible Research and Innovation concept that may be implemented in technology transfer processes executed at universities. RRI concept is still under development. A discussion around the conceptual dimensions of RRI will be followed by the strategic challenges of universities. The study resulted in two conclusions. Firstly, the RRI concept may shift the focus of TTOs (Technology Transfer Offices) from outcomes (revenues, cash flow, rate of return, patents, license fee, etc.) to processes, which further leads to the second conclusion, that all seven presented conceptual dimensions should indicate particular types of processes in university TTO. Fulfillment of these two conclusions makes possible to implement RRI on University in a wider perspective, than just fulfill the requirements of administrative funders.
In: Horyzonty polityki: HP = Horizons of politics, Band 14, Heft 49, S. 35-52
ISSN: 2353-950X
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to answer the research question: Which issues play crucial roles in universities' responsible research and the innovation transfer process? The tool used to achieve the aim of the study was analysis of the specific role of the concept of responsible research and innovation transfer from universities to the economy.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEMS AND METHODS: The research results can generate innovations that can be transferred to the economy. Considering all stakeholders of innovations transferred from universities to the economy, the criteria of evaluating innovations in terms of responsibility should be studied. The research method is based on literature analysis.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article begins with a literature review in the area of research and responsible innovation. Then, an attempt is made to synthetically analyze the dimensions of responsible innovation in order to formulate a basis for further inference. In the next part of the study, we used six dimensions of responsibility to explore the process of innovation transfer from universities to the economy.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The article shows that on the basis of the assumptions of the concept of responsible research and technology transfer, it is possible to create a framework that is the basis for evaluating the activity of a university in relation to the economic environment. Moreover, the Quadruple Helix framework of innovation is the most relevant tool to analyze actors and their interactions in an innovation ecosystem.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Responsible innovation dimensions such as inclusion, anticipation, responsiveness, reflexivity, sustainability, care could be considered as a basis for evaluating universities' technology transfer process.
In: Baklarz, Agnieszka and Śledzik, Karol and Pęksyk, Marcin and Bławat, Bogusław, Summary of the Results of Pana's Inspections Until the End of June 2022. Selected Issues in the Area of Fair Value Estimates (December 13, 2022). Inspection Department, Polish Agency for Audit Oversight, Available at SSRN
SSRN
In: Pioch, J., Chmielewski, M., Płoska, R., Śledzik, K. (2022). COVID-19 Anchor for Cruise Tourism. An analysis of Gdańsk's and Gdynia's Cruise Tourism in the 2017-2020 Period. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, (Volume XIII, Spring), 1(57): 264 - 272. DOI:10.14505/jemt.v13.1(57).24
SSRN
In: Śledzik, K., Płoska, R., Chmielewski, M., Barembruch, A. (2021). Calm before the Storm in the European Tourism Sector: Pre-COVID-19 Multivariate Competitive Position Analysis in the 2011-2019 Period. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, (Volume XII, Fall), 6(54): 1676 - 1687. DOI:10.1450
SSRN
In: Chmielewski Mariusz, Śledzik Karol, Płoska Renata, Malinowska Ewa: Multivariate sustainable development goals analysis - competitive position of European countries in 2022, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 2024, nr 192, s.63-78. DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2024.192.4
SSRN
In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy (2023) 14:5065–5085 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01487-3
SSRN
In: Sledzik, K.; Płoska, R.; Chmielewski, M.; Barembruch, A.; Szmelter-Jarosz, A.; K˛edzierska-Szczepaniak, A.; Antonowicz, P. Multivariate Pharma Technology Transfer Analysis: Civilization Diseases and COVID-19 Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1954.
SSRN
In: Colizzi , V , Mezzana , D , Ovseiko , P V , Caiati , G , Colonnello , C , Declich , A , Buchan , A M , Edmunds , L , Buzan , E , Zerbini , L , Djilianov , D , Kalpazidou Schmidt , E , Bielawski , K P , Elster , D , Salvato , M , Alcantara , L C J , Minutolo , A , Potestà , M , Bachiddu , E , Milano , M J , Henderson , L R , Kiparoglou , V , Friesen , P , Sheehan , M , Moyankova , D , Rusanov , K , Wium , M , Raszczyk , I , Konieczny , I , Gwizdala , J P , Śledzik , K , Barendziak , T , Birkholz , J , Müller , N , Warrelmann , J , Meyer , U , Filser , J , Khouri Barreto , F & Montesano , C 2019 , ' Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2) : Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation ' , JMIR research protocols , vol. 8 , no. 3 , 11745 . https://doi.org/10.2196/11745
Background: Promoting Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a major strategy of the "Science with and for Society" work program of the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. RRI aims to achieve a better alignment of research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The RRI strategy includes the "keys" of public engagement, open access, gender, ethics, and science education. The Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2) project promotes RRI in 6 European research institutions and universities from Bulgaria, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Poland, and the United Kingdom, in partnership with a further 6 institutions from Brazil, Denmark, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. Objective: The project aims to attain RRI structural change in 6 European institutions by implementing action plans (APs) and developing APs for 3 non-European institutions active in the field of biosciences; use the implementation of APs as a learning process with a view to developing a set of guidelines on the implementation of RRI; and develop a sustainable model for RRI in biosciences. Methods: The project comprises interrelated research and implementation designed to achieve the aforementioned specific objectives. The project is organized into 6 core work packages and 5 supporting work packages. The core work packages deal with the implementation of institutional APs in 6 European institutions based on the structural change activation model. The supporting work packages include technical assistance, learning process on RRI-oriented structural change, monitoring and assessment, communication and dissemination, and project management. Results: The project is funded by Horizon 2020 and will run for 4 years (May 2016-April 2020). As of June 2018, the initial phase has been completed. The participating institutions have developed and approved APs and commenced their implementation. An observation tool has been launched by the Technical Assistance Team to collect information from the implementation of APs; the Evaluation & Assessment team has started monitoring the advancement of the project. As part of the communication and dissemination strategy, a project website, a Facebook page, and a Twitter account have been launched and are updated periodically. The International Scientific Advisory Committee has been formed to advise on the reporting and dissemination of the project's results. Conclusions: In the short term, we anticipate that the project will have a considerable impact on the organizational processes and structures, improving the RRI uptake in the participating institutions. In the medium term, we expect to make RRI-oriented organizational change scalable across Europe by developing guidelines on RRI implementation and an RRI model in biosciences. In the long term, we expect that the project would help increase the ability of research institutions to make discoveries and innovations in better alignment with societal needs and values.
BASE