Suchergebnisse

The biggest concern for the Lithuanian national criminal and criminal procedure law is the definition of features of certain crimes and minimal terms of imprisonment for certain crimes in EU legislation, as well as withdrawal of the rule of ne bis in idem in international legal assistance in criminal matters.

The biggest concern for the Lithuanian national criminal and criminal procedure law is the definition of features of certain crimes and minimal terms of imprisonment for certain crimes in EU legislation, as well as withdrawal of the rule of ne bis in idem in international legal assistance in criminal matters.

The biggest concern for the Lithuanian national criminal and criminal procedure law is the definition of features of certain crimes and minimal terms of imprisonment for certain crimes in EU legislation, as well as withdrawal of the rule of ne bis in idem in international legal assistance in criminal matters.

The biggest concern for the Lithuanian national criminal and criminal procedure law is the definition of features of certain crimes and minimal terms of imprisonment for certain crimes in EU legislation, as well as withdrawal of the rule of ne bis in idem in international legal assistance in criminal matters.

Part I: Complicated Historical Heritage: Dealing with the Totalitarian Past -- 1. Transitional Justice Cases Against Lithuania at the European Court of Human Rights -- 2. The Legal Framework for Administrative Liability in Lithuania: Lifting Legal Barriers to the Efficient Regulation of Administrative Offences -- 3. Development of Property Protection in Criminal Law During Lithuania's Independence -- 4. Some Aspects of Economic Regulation in Lithuanian Constitutional Law: From Planned Economy to the Fourth Industrial Revolution -- Part II: Sophisticated Socio-Political and Other Conditions in the Process of Adoption to New (Rule of Law) Standards -- 5. Development of the Justice System in Lithuania: Revolution, Evolution or Involution? -- 6. Evolution of the Lithuanian Civil Procedure: Objectives and Reality -- 7. Development of Arbitration Law in the Republic of Lithuania After the Restoration of Independence -- 8. Understanding Legal Responses to Technological Change in Lithuania Since 1990: Examples of Assisted Reproduction and Skin Care Procedures Regulation -- Part III: Authority of International Legal Sources over a Period of 30 Years -- 9. Shift in the Role of Lithuanian Courts in the Context of Lithuania's Membership in International Organizations -- 10. Forensic Examinations in Lithuania: 30 Years of Experience (1990–2020) -- 11. Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Lithuanian Case -- Part IV: The Search for Experimental and/or Entirely New National Legal Models -- 12. The Development and Prospects of the Lithuanian Constitutional Justice Model -- 13. Constitutional Principles As a Criterion for Declaring Legal Regulation to Be Incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania -- 14. Administrative Liability in Lithuania: The Model of Corporate Administrative Liability -- 15. Collective Labour Law in Lithuania: Search for a National Model -- 16. Tendencies and Problematical Aspects of Criminal Liability of a Legal Person in Lithuania.

The Lithuanian Constitution (1992) is described in the report as a typical revolutionary constitution, adopted after the collapse of a totalitarian regime. The Constitutional Court (CC) is a strong player both in terms of the protection of fundamental rights and as an arbitrator in political disputes. The report observes that due to their bitter historical struggle for statehood, Lithuanians have generally treated membership in the EU as a fundamental geopolitical choice. From this perspective, the Constitution is unique, as it was – in a self-standing constitutional act – extensively opened to the EU, whilst another constitutional act prohibits joining any union based on the former USSR. The CC has held that the Constitution establishes a constitutional imperative of EU and NATO membership. By and large, no critical constitutional debates have arisen in relation to EU and transnational law. Some exceptions include an (unsuccessful) request to hold a referendum on the adoption of the euro on the ground that the nature of the EMU had been changed by the ESM Treaty due to the extensive financial liabilities it might entail. The report notes that these discussions were overshadowed by events in Ukraine and geopolitical security concerns. The report also observes a lack of real discussion both in academia and in the public discourse concerning various issues decided at the EU

The Lithuanian Constitution (1992) is described in the report as a typical revolutionary constitution, adopted after the collapse of a totalitarian regime. The Constitutional Court (CC) is a strong player both in terms of the protection of fundamental rights and as an arbitrator in political disputes. The report observes that due to their bitter historical struggle for statehood, Lithuanians have generally treated membership in the EU as a fundamental geopolitical choice. From this perspective, the Constitution is unique, as it was – in a self-standing constitutional act – extensively opened to the EU, whilst another constitutional act prohibits joining any union based on the former USSR. The CC has held that the Constitution establishes a constitutional imperative of EU and NATO membership. By and large, no critical constitutional debates have arisen in relation to EU and transnational law. Some exceptions include an (unsuccessful) request to hold a referendum on the adoption of the euro on the ground that the nature of the EMU had been changed by the ESM Treaty due to the extensive financial liabilities it might entail. The report notes that these discussions were overshadowed by events in Ukraine and geopolitical security concerns. The report also observes a lack of real discussion both in academia and in the public discourse concerning various issues decided at the EU

The Lithuanian Constitution (1992) is described in the report as a typical revolutionary constitution, adopted after the collapse of a totalitarian regime. The Constitutional Court (CC) is a strong player both in terms of the protection of fundamental rights and as an arbitrator in political disputes. The report observes that due to their bitter historical struggle for statehood, Lithuanians have generally treated membership in the EU as a fundamental geopolitical choice. From this perspective, the Constitution is unique, as it was – in a self-standing constitutional act – extensively opened to the EU, whilst another constitutional act prohibits joining any union based on the former USSR. The CC has held that the Constitution establishes a constitutional imperative of EU and NATO membership. By and large, no critical constitutional debates have arisen in relation to EU and transnational law. Some exceptions include an (unsuccessful) request to hold a referendum on the adoption of the euro on the ground that the nature of the EMU had been changed by the ESM Treaty due to the extensive financial liabilities it might entail. The report notes that these discussions were overshadowed by events in Ukraine and geopolitical security concerns. The report also observes a lack of real discussion both in academia and in the public discourse concerning various issues decided at the EU

The Lithuanian Constitution (1992) is described in the report as a typical revolutionary constitution, adopted after the collapse of a totalitarian regime. The Constitutional Court (CC) is a strong player both in terms of the protection of fundamental rights and as an arbitrator in political disputes. The report observes that due to their bitter historical struggle for statehood, Lithuanians have generally treated membership in the EU as a fundamental geopolitical choice. From this perspective, the Constitution is unique, as it was – in a self-standing constitutional act – extensively opened to the EU, whilst another constitutional act prohibits joining any union based on the former USSR. The CC has held that the Constitution establishes a constitutional imperative of EU and NATO membership. By and large, no critical constitutional debates have arisen in relation to EU and transnational law. Some exceptions include an (unsuccessful) request to hold a referendum on the adoption of the euro on the ground that the nature of the EMU had been changed by the ESM Treaty due to the extensive financial liabilities it might entail. The report notes that these discussions were overshadowed by events in Ukraine and geopolitical security concerns. The report also observes a lack of real discussion both in academia and in the public discourse concerning various issues decided at the EU

This publication contains the proceedings of the 9th European Criminal Law Academic Network (ECLAN) PhD Seminar on European Criminal Justice "The significance of EU criminal law in the 21st century: the need for further harmonisation or new criminal policy", hosted by the Vilnius University Faculty of Law. Participants of the event presented their research in various criminal law fields related to the EU substantive criminal law and its national implementation, combating organised crime and the EPPO, criminal policy and human rights and cooperation in criminal matters and other legal instruments. Thus, the publication provides short papers of the main ideas and conclusions of several speakers' presentations.