Suchergebnisse

Constitutional regulation of local government institute during the period of the First Lithuanian Republic was analysed in this article. Temporary Constitution of 1918, 1919 and 1920 and permanent Constitution of 1922, 1928 and 1938 which regulate status of local government were studied. It was established that constitutional status of local government was not defined in temporary Constitution. Analysis of permanent Constitution of Lithuanian Republic showed that only basic principles of organization of local government were defined. Tendency of gradual restriction in constitutional regulation of local government status was noticed in Constitution of 1928 and 1938 compared to Constitution of 1922.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.15.3.16618

Constitutional regulation of local government institute during the period of the First Lithuanian Republic was analysed in this article. Temporary Constitution of 1918, 1919 and 1920 and permanent Constitution of 1922, 1928 and 1938 which regulate status of local government were studied. It was established that constitutional status of local government was not defined in temporary Constitution. Analysis of permanent Constitution of Lithuanian Republic showed that only basic principles of organization of local government were defined. Tendency of gradual restriction in constitutional regulation of local government status was noticed in Constitution of 1928 and 1938 compared to Constitution of 1922.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.15.3.16618 ; Straipsnyje nagrinėjamas vietos savivaldybių konstitucinis reguliavimas Pirmosios Lietuvos Respublikos laikotarpiu. Analizuojamos laikinosios 1918 m., 1919 m. ir 1920 m. konstitucijos ir nuolatinių 1922 m., 1928 m., 1938 m. konstitucijų nuostatos, reguliuojančios vietos savivaldybių statusą. Nustatyta, kad laikinosiose konstitucijoje vietos savivaldybių konstitucinis statusas nebuvo įtvirtintas. Nuolatinių Lietuvos Respublikos konstitucijų nuostatų analizė rodo, kad jose buvo įtvirtinti tik pagrindiniai vietos savivaldybių organizavimo ir veiklos principai. Straipsnyje pagrindžiama savivaldybių statuso konstitucinio reguliavimo srities palaipsnio ribojimo tendencija 1928 m. ir 1938 m. konstitucijose, palyginti su 1922 m. konstitucija.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.15.3.16618

Constitutional regulation of local government institute during the period of the First Lithuanian Republic was analysed in this article. Temporary Constitution of 1918, 1919 and 1920 and permanent Constitution of 1922, 1928 and 1938 which regulate status of local government were studied. It was established that constitutional status of local government was not defined in temporary Constitution. Analysis of permanent Constitution of Lithuanian Republic showed that only basic principles of organization of local government were defined. Tendency of gradual restriction in constitutional regulation of local government status was noticed in Constitution of 1928 and 1938 compared to Constitution of 1922.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.15.3.16618

Constitutional regulation of local government institute during the period of the First Lithuanian Republic was analysed in this article. Temporary Constitution of 1918, 1919 and 1920 and permanent Constitution of 1922, 1928 and 1938 which regulate status of local government were studied. It was established that constitutional status of local government was not defined in temporary Constitution. Analysis of permanent Constitution of Lithuanian Republic showed that only basic principles of organization of local government were defined. Tendency of gradual restriction in constitutional regulation of local government status was noticed in Constitution of 1928 and 1938 compared to Constitution of 1922.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.15.3.16618

Constitutional regulation of local government institute during the period of the First Lithuanian Republic was analysed in this article. Temporary Constitution of 1918, 1919 and 1920 and permanent Constitution of 1922, 1928 and 1938 which regulate status of local government were studied. It was established that constitutional status of local government was not defined in temporary Constitution. Analysis of permanent Constitution of Lithuanian Republic showed that only basic principles of organization of local government were defined. Tendency of gradual restriction in constitutional regulation of local government status was noticed in Constitution of 1928 and 1938 compared to Constitution of 1922.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.15.3.16618

The aim of this article is to analyse the differences of e-government development between a) member states of the Eastern Border of the European Union (EU-8) and member states of the old EU (EU-15); b) member states of EU-8 and the all countries of EU (EU-28); c) member states of EU-8 and countries, which became member states of EU after 2004 (EU- 5). Comparative analysis was used to determine and evaluate the tendencies of e-government development in EU-8 during the period of 2003-2012. Data of United Nations E-Government survey about e-government development was used in this article. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria compose EU-8. It was estimated that countries of EU-8 made significant progress in development of e-government. However the gap between member states of EU-8 and countries of EU-15, EU-5 and EU-28 still remains. Higher homogeneity in the area of e-government development in the countries of EU-8, EU- 15 and EU-5 compared to the countries of EU-28 was found.

The article analyses influence of constitutional regulation on development of local governance in the Republic of Lithuania and show the setting of the prerogative limits of legislators in the areas of administrative partition of state territory and organization of local governance. According to analysis of the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, the wide prerogatives of legislators to specify and elaborate the main principles of organization of local governance that are established in the Constitution and to regulate other issues related to development of this governance by law are shown. The article shows that provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania do not make any difficulties in implementation of changes in the area of organization of local governance. ; Straipsnyje analizuojama konstitucinio reguliavimo įtaka vietos valdymo raidai Lietuvos Respublikos aukštesniuosiuose administraciniuose vienetuose, nustatomos įstatymų leidėjo prerogatyvų ribos valstybės teritorijos administracinio suskirstymo ir vietos valdymo organizavimo srityse. Remiantis Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucijos nuostatų ir Konstitucinio teismo nutarimų turinio analize, pateiktos įstatymų leidėjo plačios prerogatyvos įstatymais konkretizuoti ir detalizuoti Konstitucijoje įtvirtintus pagrindinius vietos valdymo organizavimo principus, reguliuoti kitus su šio valdymo raida susijusius klausimus, pagrindžiama, kad Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucijos nuostatos neapsunkina pokyčių įgyvendinimo vietos valdymo organizavimo srityje.

The aim of this article is to analyse the differences of e-government development between a) member states of the Eastern Border of the European Union (EU-8) and member states of the old EU (EU-15); b) member states of EU-8 and the all countries of EU (EU-28); c) member states of EU-8 and countries, which became member states of EU after 2004 (EU-5). Comparative analysis was used to determine and evaluate the tendencies of e-government development in EU-8 during the period of 2003-2012. Data of United Nations E-Government survey about e-government development was used in this article. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria compose EU-8. It was estimated that countries of EU-8 made significant progress in development of e-government. However the gap between member states of EU-8 and countries of EU-15, EU-5 and EU-28 still remains. Higher homogeneity in the area of e-government development in the countries of EU-8, EU-15 and EU-5 compared to the countries of EU-28 was found. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.1.6504 ; E. valdžios vystymas yra svarbi viešojo administravimo modernizavimo dalis, susijusi su gyventojų dalyvavimo, valdžios skaidrumo ir atskaitomybės stiprinimu. Šioje srityje egzistuoja reikšmingų skirtumų tarp valstybių. Straipsnio tikslas – išanalizuoti egzistuojančius e. valdžios raidos skirtumus tarp Europos Sąjungos (toliau – ES) rytinio pasienio valstybių, senųjų ES valstybių, kitų valstybių, kurios ES narėmis tapo po 2004 m., ir visų ES valstybių. Remiantis lyginamąja analize nustatomos 2003–2012 m. rytinio pasienio valstybių e. valdžios raidos tendencijos. Aptariant e. valdžios raidą ES naudojami Jungtinių Tautų tyrimų duomenys apie e. valdžios išsivystymą. Nustatyta, kad rytinio pasienio valstybės padarė aiškią pažangą plėtojant e. valdžią, tačiau atsilikimas nuo kitų ES valstybių grupių išliko. Pažymima, kad rytinio pasienio valstybių grupei būdingas didesnis homogeniškumas e. valdžios išsivystymo srityje nei kitoms ES valstybių grupėms. DOI: ...

The aim of this article is to analyse the differences of e-government development between a) member states of the Eastern Border of the European Union (EU-8) and member states of the old EU (EU-15); b) member states of EU-8 and the all countries of EU (EU-28); c) member states of EU-8 and countries, which became member states of EU after 2004 (EU- 5). Comparative analysis was used to determine and evaluate the tendencies of e-government development in EU-8 during the period of 2003-2012. Data of United Nations E-Government survey about e-government development was used in this article. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria compose EU-8. It was estimated that countries of EU-8 made significant progress in development of e-government. However the gap between member states of EU-8 and countries of EU-15, EU-5 and EU-28 still remains. Higher homogeneity in the area of e-government development in the countries of EU-8, EU- 15 and EU-5 compared to the countries of EU-28 was found.

The aim of this article is to analyse the differences of e-government development between a) member states of the Eastern Border of the European Union (EU-8) and member states of the old EU (EU-15); b) member states of EU-8 and the all countries of EU (EU-28); c) member states of EU-8 and countries, which became member states of EU after 2004 (EU- 5). Comparative analysis was used to determine and evaluate the tendencies of e-government development in EU-8 during the period of 2003-2012. Data of United Nations E-Government survey about e-government development was used in this article. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria compose EU-8. It was estimated that countries of EU-8 made significant progress in development of e-government. However the gap between member states of EU-8 and countries of EU-15, EU-5 and EU-28 still remains. Higher homogeneity in the area of e-government development in the countries of EU-8, EU- 15 and EU-5 compared to the countries of EU-28 was found.

Aiming to identify the trends of county and regional governance transformation after the Parliamentary elections of 2008, the article analyses the guidelines of the following documents: the election programmes of different political parties, the agreement of the ruling coalition, and the Government Programme. The discussion regarding the future of the counties is finalized in the Government Programme, which states that counties have to be dissolved. It is stated that the Government speaks up for the assignment of the county functions to municipalities; it is planned to give self-government rights to regions; institutions of the regions should be formed on the principle of delegation. A two tier territorial self-government system should be formed in Lithuania. The article shows that a detailed plan of implementation of the county and regional governance reform does not yet exist. ; Siekiant nustatyti Lietuvos Respublikos apskričių ir regionų valdymo transformacijų kryptis po 2008 m. rinkimų į Seimą, straipsnyje analizuojamos politinių partijų rinkimų programos, valdančiosios koalicijos sutarties ir Vyriausybės programos nuostatos. Atkreipiamas dėmesys į dabartinės Vyriausybės programą, kurioje nurodyta, kad apskritys bus naikinamos, pasisakoma už apskričių viršininkų administracijų funkcijų perdavimą savivaldybėms, planuojama suteikti savivaldos teisę regionams, formuojant jų valdymo institucijas laikantis delegavimo principo.

The aim of this article is to analyse the differences of e-government development between a) member states of the Eastern Border of the European Union (EU-8) and member states of the old EU (EU-15); b) member states of EU-8 and the all countries of EU (EU-28); c) member states of EU-8 and countries, which became member states of EU after 2004 (EU- 5). Comparative analysis was used to determine and evaluate the tendencies of e-government development in EU-8 during the period of 2003-2012. Data of United Nations E-Government survey about e-government development was used in this article. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria compose EU-8. It was estimated that countries of EU-8 made significant progress in development of e-government. However the gap between member states of EU-8 and countries of EU-15, EU-5 and EU-28 still remains. Higher homogeneity in the area of e-government development in the countries of EU-8, EU- 15 and EU-5 compared to the countries of EU-28 was found.