Suchergebnisse

В статье проанализирована роль исторической памяти в мультикультурных обществах. Исследовано соотношение исторической памяти и идентичности как важных составляющих в бесчисленных «войнах памяти», охвативших нынешние мультикультурного общества. Сделан вывод о необходимости смещения полюса изучения с политической истории в направлении социальной и культурной истории, которые в значительной степени примиряют, а не разъединяют мультикультурные общества.Ключевые слова: историческая память, мультикультурализм, коллективная память, Украина. The article analyzes the role of historical memory in multicultural societies. Historical memory in transitive societies plays an ambivalent character. On the one hand, the formation of civil society on a common platform becomes a bridge for the unification of society. On the other hand, in the case of addressing controversial issues in society, an intergenerational / social group gap is formed. Memory is involved in the political struggle, therefore, it is often associated with the influence of the political order in shaping historical knowledge in solving specific political problems.The relationship between historical memory and identity as an important component in the countless "memory wars" that has embraced present-day multicultural societies is researched. It is concluded that there is a need to shift the field of study from political history into the direction of social and cultural history, which largely reconcile rather than disconnect multicultural societies.Historical memory is increasingly used to interpret reality. Reminiscences in multicultural societies can open old wounds and revive divisions of a certain part of society. On the other hand, the periods of intervention, glory and rule can be vulnerable, since they allow us to characterize the attitude towards neighbors, which will not promote tolerance and peace. The growth of nationalism in multicultural societies on the basis of the mythologization of historical memory is associated with such manifestation as ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is defined as the tendency and endeavor of man to evaluate all life and cultural phenomena through the prism of his ethnic group, which is the criterion of the most perfect in all respects. As a consequence, the spread of manifestations of "multicultural blindness" and micro-conflicts on an inter-ethnic basis are becomingKey words: historical memory, multiculturalism, collective memory, Ukraine. ; В статті проаналізовано роль історичної пам'яті в мультикультурних суспільствах. Досліджено співвідношення історичної пам'яті та ідентичності як важливих складових в незліченних «війнах пам'яті», що охопили нинішні мультикультурні суспільства. Зроблено висновок щодо необхідності зміщення полюсу вивчення з політичної історії в напрямку соціальної та культурної історії, які в значній мірі примирюють, а не роз'єднують мультикультурні суспільства.Ключові слова: історична пам'ять, мультикультуралізм, колективна пам'ять, Україна. В статье проанализирована роль исторической памяти в мультикультурных обществах. Исследовано соотношение исторической памяти и идентичности как важных составляющих в бесчисленных «войнах памяти», охвативших нынешние мультикультурного общества. Сделан вывод о необходимости смещения полюса изучения с политической истории в направлении социальной и культурной истории, которые в значительной степени примиряют, а не разъединяют мультикультурные общества.Ключевые слова: историческая память, мультикультурализм, коллективная память, Украина. The article analyzes the role of historical memory in multicultural societies. Historical memory in transitive societies plays an ambivalent character. On the one hand, the formation of civil society on a common platform becomes a bridge for the unification of society. On the other hand, in the case of addressing controversial issues in society, an intergenerational / social group gap is formed. Memory is involved in the political struggle, therefore, it is often associated with the influence of the political order in shaping historical knowledge in solving specific political problems.The relationship between historical memory and identity as an important component in the countless "memory wars" that has embraced present-day multicultural societies is researched. It is concluded that there is a need to shift the field of study from political history into the direction of social and cultural history, which largely reconcile rather than disconnect multicultural societies.Historical memory is increasingly used to interpret reality. Reminiscences in multicultural societies can open old wounds and revive divisions of a certain part of society. On the other hand, the periods of intervention, glory and rule can be vulnerable, since they allow us to characterize the attitude towards neighbors, which will not promote tolerance and peace. The growth of nationalism in multicultural societies on the basis of the mythologization of historical memory is associated with such manifestation as ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is defined as the tendency and endeavor of man to evaluate all life and cultural phenomena through the prism of his ethnic group, which is the criterion of the most perfect in all respects. As a consequence, the spread of manifestations of "multicultural blindness" and micro-conflicts on an inter-ethnic basis are becomingKey words: historical memory, multiculturalism, collective memory, Ukraine.