Suchergebnisse

Названы недостатки законодательной базы в сфере обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения. Предложены пути усовершенствования процедуры законотворчества для повышения эффективности законов, направленных на сохранение жизни и здоровья участников дорожного движения. ; The paper points out shortcomings of Russia's regulatory framework in the sphere of traffic accident prevention, and proposes measures for improving lawmaking procedures to improve efficiency of legislation aimed at saving lives and health of road users.

Анализируется проблема нормативно-правовой базы и терминологического обеспечения деятельности по предупреждению ДТП, отмечаются недостатки российского законодательства, регулирующего эту сферу, формулируются принципы обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения. ; The article analyses the problem of regulatory-and-legal framework and terminological support for activities into prevention of traffic accidents, notes shortcomings of Russia's legislation in this sector, and formulates principles for ensuring traffic safety.

Анализируется проблема нормативно-правовой базы и терминологического обеспечения деятельности по предупреждению ДТП, отмечаются недостатки российского законодательства, регулирующего эту сферу, формулируются принципы обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения. ; The article analyses the problem of regulatory and legal framework and terminological support for activity in prevention of traffic accidents, notes shortcomings of Russian legislation which deals with this sphere, and formulates principles of enhancing traffic safety.

Кравченко П. А. Активна роль правосвідомості в правовій регламентації людської діяльності / П. А. Кравченко // Філософські обрії. – 2016. – № 36. – С. 61–69. ; Доведено, що поряд з відображенням правової дійсності правосвідомість виконує активну функцію регулятора поведінки людей. Їй притаманна дієва роль в правовій регламентації людської діяльності на основі відображення і оцінки правових норм у свідомості кожної людини. Суттєвим елементом правосвідомості є впевненість громадян у необхідності права, правової держави, у дотриманні законності. Правосвідомість передбачає обов'язкове перетворення правових знань, ідей в особисту переконаність яка здійснює прямий вплив на вольову діяльність людини, на прийняття нею рішень, утримуючи від протиправних дій, що особливо важливо в процесі сучасного європейського вибору України як держави. ; It is proved that along with display of the legal reality, the legal awareness takes an active regulating function in human's behavior. It is inherent effective role in the legal regulation of human activity based on reflection and evaluation of the law in the mind of every individual. An essential element of justice is the confidence of citizens in the need of law, constitutional state as well as law enforcing. Legal awareness provides the mandatory conversion of legal knowledge, ideas into the personal conviction which has a direct effect on volitional activity of a man to accept its decisions, refraining from the unlawful acts, which are especially significant in the modern European choice of Ukraine as a state. Obviously, the legal culture of personality does not only include knowledge of the law, understanding of the nature and scope of the law, desire and ability to comply with the rule of law, voluntarily enforce its requirements, but also specific legal adjustments regarding the attitudes to the idea of law, constitutional state, law, institutions and values which it protects. It is also awareness of the legal problems of society, the rights, freedoms and duties of a man to other people and society. The state independence that Ukraine has achieved, the transition from a totalitarian regime to democracy as well as the process of national revival requires proper education of the citizens of the new state that would properly know the essentials of legal culture, in addition to the law following. Especially nowadays there is a decline in production and the associated rise in unemployment, the decline of morality, unreasonably high prices for many forms of entertainment, reducing the number of sports clubs, schools, youth camps, almost outright propaganda of pornography, cruelty and violence, the disintegration of the public and public institutions which leads to activation of the law - educational work among the youth, especially students.

Славетна історія історичного факультету Полтавського національного педагогічного університету імені В.Г. Короленка була започаткована заснуванням Учительського інституту та Історико-філологічного факультету в Полтаві. ; The history of Poltava Pedagogical University started from the foundation of The Teacher Training Institute (1914) and History and Philology Department of Kharkov University in Poltava (1918). The first Dean of History and Philology Department was a well-known scholar I.F. Rybakov, the pro - dean - N.Yu. Mirza-Avakyants, later she was a renowned scholar of the history of Ukraine of seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Leading experts were invited to reading lectures at the faculty, they were the historians of Kharkov University – Professors D.I.Bahaliy, V.O.Barvinskyy, Ye.V.Kaharov, M.F.Sumtsov. In April 1921 the two schools were established, and since that time it functioned under the following names of the Higher Institute of Folk Education (1921-1930), Institute for Social Education (1930-1933 ), Poltava Pedagogical Institute (1933-1999 ), and from December 2009 - Poltava National Pedagogical University named after Korolenko. And all these years has university training of highly qualified teachers of history, geography, economics, law, culture, social science. The Faculty has PNPU significant achievements in the field of research. Among its graduate students – Director of the Institute of History of the USSR in 40-50 years, O.K. Kasymenko, a well- known specialist in the fi eld of military history M.P. Derev'yanko, Ph.D. M.K. Boyko, Yu.V. Voloshyn , L.M. Zhvanko, V.I. Kozachenko, M.I. Nekoz, O.O. Nestulya, I.M. Petrenko, P.H. Radko, V.L. Savyelyev, R.A. Sitarchuk, B .V. Strilets, S.M. Tymchenko, T.O.Sharavara, M.A. Yakymenko. There were about 400 students who got their scientific degree while working at Poltava Pedagogical University. In 1966, at the History and Philology Department was separated into the departments History and Philology. Since then, Faculty of History has become a leading institution of their personnel academic staff, innovative forms of educational process. Today the dean of the History Department is P.A. Kravchenko, Ph.D., professor and an honored educator of Ukraine. Today there are more than 600 full-time and part-time students. The Department has five undergraduate and graduate chairs - History of Ukraine (the head is the Doctor of sciences, prof. R.A. Sitarchuk), World history and methodology of history teaching (headed by D.Sc., Professor B.V. Hod) geography and regional studies (headed by candidate of the geographical, Professor L.M. Bulava) philosophy ( headed by Professor P.A. Kravchenko), law (Headed by Associate Professor K.B. Pyvovarska). Around 90% of faculty teachers have degrees and titles. To prepare scientists with scientific degrees «Ph.D.», «Doctor of Philosophy», «Doctor of Science» in the History of Ukraine, world history and methods of teaching history and philosophy the department has postgraduate and doctoral studies. The faculty has its own library of scientific course books, they are «Historical Memory» and «Philosophical Horizons» , which have been recognized and licensed as professional edition on the national level, the results of scientific research and dissertations can be published there. At the faculty there are 4 scientific schools, where current problems of the state are being discussed and analyzed, as the relationship of church and state, historical, geographical local history of Christian denominations.

Кравченко П. А. Демократизація сучасного українського державотворення: теоретико-практичні засади / П. А. Кравченко, А. І. Мельник // Філософські обрії : Наук.-теорет. журн. / Ін-т філософії імені Г. С. Сковороди HAH України, Полтав. нац. пед. ун-т імені В. Г. Короленка. – 2018. – Вип. 39. – С. 76-89. ; Стратегія демократичного розвитку полягає в утвердженні демократичних цінностей, збалансованої й ефективної взаємодії гілок влади, подолані конфлікточенності суспільства, вирішенні економічних проблем. Найголовніше завдання нинішнього моменту – це оптимізація процесу створення демократичної, народної влади, яка була б єдиною у відстоюванні докорінних українських інтересів у внутрішній і зовнішній політиці, поєднувала б національний і світовий досвід демократизації суспільного життя. Основне питання демократизації українського суспільства – це створення сприятливих умов реалізації прав і свобод людини з одночасним виконанням її обов'язків. ; The strategy of democratic development is in the establishment of democratic values, in balanced and effective interaction of branches of power, in overcoming the conflicts of the society, in solving economic problems. Nowadays the main task is to optimize the process of creating a democratic, popular power that would be the only one in defending radical Ukrainian interests in domestic and foreign policy, would combine national and world experience in the democratization of public life. The main issue of democratization of Ukrainian society is the creation of favorable conditions for the realization of human rights and freedoms at the same time with their responsibilities. Taking these facts into consideration the range of problems is to be solved in Ukraine. They are: 1. To maintain the balance and steadiness of the Constitution of Ukraine; 2. To carry out the work continuously on the improvement of the electoral law, until the establishment of a stable law, the rules of which would be in accordance with the laws of the countries of the European Union. 3. To overcome excessive bureaucratization of public administration and self-government bodies, to train and select skilled personnel, and raise their level of managerial and general culture. 4. To modernize the management structures, rather than create a new ones. 5. To increase the level of political and legal culture of the population which was developed under the condition of historical practice. The people of Ukraine resisted the authorities as strangers, and for centuries as well as foreign ones, did not respect the laws that this power established. Therefore, outside loyalty to the authorities a law-abiding citizen who learned not to to be active , but to circumvent the laws was hidden. It is necessary to return the people's trust the authorities and respect for the law, regardless of which social group belongs to the same citizen. 6. Creation of a system of educational propaganda work with the population in all educational institutions in order to raise the level of morality of society, the general political and legal culture. Bringing up the generation with the help of history should become a full-fledged kind of education for children and adults. Ukraine does not need a strategy of importing democracy. It is necessary to realize the internal potential of the country, its history, education and science, and then to engage world experience. Without a positive transformation of the national character, value orientations of the population of the country, any limited informational propaganda campaigns will produce a short-term effect.

Кравченко П. А. Основні віхи історії кафедри філософії ПНПУ імені В.Г.Короленка (до 100-річчя заснування) / П. А. Кравченко, Я. Є. Блоха // Філософські обрії : Наук.-теорет. журн. / Ін-т філософії імені Г. С. Сковороди HAH України, Полтав. нац. пед. ун-т імені В. Г. Короленка. – 2018. – Вип. 39. – С. 144-163. ; У статті висвітлені основні віхи історії кафедри філософії як окремого структурного підрозділу Полтавського національного (державного) педагогічного університету (інституту) імені В. Г. Короленка. На основі аналізу переважно архівних матеріалів встановлено, що цьогоріч кафедра філософії відзначає 100-річчя від дня заснування, хоча цикл філософських дисциплін викладався і до появи окремого структурного підрозділу. За 100 років існування кафедра мала різні назви (суспільствознавства – 1918-1931; марксизму-ленінізму – 1931-1932; діалектичного матеріалізму – 1932-1935; соціально-економічних дисциплін – 1935-1939; марксизму-ленінізму – 1939-1947; марксизму-ленінізму, філософії та політекономії – 1947-1967; історії КПРС та філософії – 1967-1975; з 1 вересня 1975 р. – філософії), але упродовж усього цього часу на кафедрі працювали викладачі, які мали високий науковий та методичний рівень, кваліфіковано викладали цикл філософських дисциплін, сприяли формуванню високоерудованих, з глибоким почуттям патріотизму, високоморальних фахівців. ; In the article highlights major milestones of history of Department of Philosophy as a separate structural unit of Poltava V.G. Korolenko National (State) Pedagogical University (Institute). On the basis of the analysis of archival materials, it was found that this year Department of Philosophy celebrates its 100th anniversary from the date of its foundation, although the cycle of philosophical disciplines was taught even before the emergence of a separate structural subdivision. For 100 years of its existence, the department had a variety of names (of social sciences – 1918-1931, of Marxism-Leninism – 1931-1932, of dialectical materialism – 1932-1935, of socio-economic disciplines – 1935-1939, of Marxism-Leninism – 1939-1947, of Marxism-Leninism , philosophy and political economy – 1947-1967; of history of the CPSU and philosophy – 1967-1975; from September 1, 1975 – of philosophy), but throughout this time, the department had teachers who had a high scientific and methodological level, qualified the cycle of philosophical disciplines, contributed to the formation of highlyerudite, with a deep sense of patriotism, highly moral professionals. Today the Department of Philosophy has formed a powerful human potential, and the Department has become one of the leading scientific and educational centers in Ukraine. In the heart of scientific activity at the department there is a cientific school "Domestic cultural and historical experience in the process of formation of civil society", which since 1998 has been leading the doctor of philosophical sciences, professor, honored worker of Ukrainian education, academician of the Ukrainian Academy of Political Sciences P. A. Kravchenko. During the modern period of the history of the department (2004-2018), its teachers prepared and published 700 scientific works of a total volume of more than 360 printed sheets, which testify to the high scientific and methodological level of the teachers of the department.

Кравченко П. А. Глобалізаціні та антиглобалізаційні процеси в європейському соціально-філософському дискурсі / П. А. Кравченко, А. І. Мельник // Філософські обрії. – 2017. – № 37. – С. 78–99. ; Лейтмотивом центрального дискурсу нинішньої епохи є кардинальний перегляд соціальних критеріїв світового розвитку і вироблення нової концепції сучасної світобудови, що зважає на інтереси всього людства. Задля виживання світу загалом, для виведення людства з глухого кута цивілізації, стратегічний вибір сучасності полягає в розробці нової моделі глобальної інтеграції та реалізації національної стратегії випереджувального розвитку. Ця модель має ґрунтуватись на ноосферному підході до інтелектуально-інноваційного поступу людства. ; Every epoch has its central discourse, which defines the various forms of life and becomes the motto of the entire human civilization. More than half a century the modern civilization being influenced by many unique and unknown factors of the previous time has been getting into the era of globalization. None of the historical period when other different integration processes were introduced is not able to be compared with the scale of modern globalization. Globalization is the objective process of integration at all levels of social and economic life, which have both positive and negative aspects. An important question is about the inner essence of globalization: the globalization centers, the effects of globalization on underdeveloped countries, prospects of the development of human civilization and so on. Anti-globalization is also an objective process which is in dialectical unity with globalization and is aimed at preserving the national and cultural identity of particular peoples and nations. Importantly, the anti-globalists are not solid opponents of integration, but they require different «rules» for less developed countries as for the schemes of redistribution of capital funds and resources, representing at the same time different logics of the worldview, a different discourse. The development of consensus positions that would unite representatives of different cultures and value systems is considered to be one of the important aspects of mankind civilization. It is therefore a very important social criteria to drastically revise the global development and production of the new concept of the modern universe that respects the interests of the mankind, for the survival of the world as a whole, to show human civilization the way out of the dead end where it founds itself at the turn of the millennium. The strategic choice of current time is to develop a new model of global integration and implementation of the national strategy for advancing the intellectual and innovation. This foundation involves Noospheric approach to the processes of the development. This is the beginning of a new global noospheric – space economy of the third millennium. We concern about its essence which lies in the intellectualization and intelligent integration of national economies into a single system of labor division. Western European integration is a unique phenomenon in the world politics and economy. Thanks to its people Europe as a unit managed to solve two important problems: eliminate the material basis of armed conflicts among the states and create favorable conditions for internationalization of economic activity. Eventually, free citizens displacing, goods and capital movement within the common European space have become evidents for the logical consequence of this process.

Кравченко П. А. Короленко як ідеолог українського культурного націоналізму / П. А. Кравченко, Я. Є. Блоха // Філософські обрії. – 2016. – № 36. – С. 10–20. ; У статті розкриті погляди одного з найбільш відомих українських мислителів, письменників і громадських діячів кінця ХІХ – початку ХХ століть Володимира Галактіоновича Короленка на проблему націоналізму. Проаналізовано погляди мислителя щодо співіснування націоналізму, патріотизму та шовінізму, захисту батьківщини, а також трансформація їх у сучасному українському суспільстві. ; The views of one of the most prominent Ukrainian thinkers, writers and public figures of the late XIX – early XX century Volodymyr Galaktionovych Korolenko on the problems of nationalism, the coexistence of nationalism, patriotism and chauvinism, protection of the homeland are reflected into the article. The author indicates, that while speaking in defense of the oppressed Ukrainian people, V.G. Korolenko stressed not only upon nationality of a person, but his ideological position as well for nationalism should not prevent each of us to see their own and others' drawbacks and merits. Thinker also urged to realize that love for native country should be almost the most important value, and it must be protected by all means, otherwise anarchy can cover the society. Analyzing the concept «nationalism», «patriotism» and «chauvinism», which often can be heard in Ukraine, V.G. Korolenko calls to reject national dissension and remnants of chauvinism and build a society based on the principles of national and cultural interaction and mutual respect, humanity and ability to recognize own mental deficiencies, turning them into advantages. Ukrainian national idea for V.G. Korolenko was undoubtedly the highest spiritual authority and main engine of social and political movements. He realized that all political competitions, all aspects of social life, all activities of intellectuals should be based on national idea, the demands of which is the idea of struggle for national independence. Obviously, a great heritage of an outstanding thinker, journalist, human rights activist and public figure V.G. Korolenko should remain as a source of national unity of the Ukrainian people, who defend their right for independence in confrontation with external and internal enemies of our country.