The main problems and obstacles to ethnonational consolidation of the Ukrainian society are investigated. Among them — the discontent of some ethnos with their status, the level of guaranteeing their rights and interests used outside by means of political, financial and cultural support. The author proves that these mechanisms complicate the process of the Ukrainian society ethnonational consolidation in some regions, nourishing the disintegrative tendencies of ethnopolitical disunity. ; The main problems and obstacles to ethnonational consolidation of the Ukrainian society are investigated. Among them — the discontent of some ethnos with their status, the level of guaranteeing their rights and interests used outside by means of political, financial and cultural support. The author proves that these mechanisms complicate the process of the Ukrainian society ethnonational consolidation in some regions, nourishing the disintegrative tendencies of ethnopolitical disunity.
The main problems and obstacles to ethnonational consolidation of the Ukrainian society are investigated. Among them — the discontent of some ethnos with their status, the level of guaranteeing their rights and interests used outside by means of political, financial and cultural support. The author proves that these mechanisms complicate the process of the Ukrainian society ethnonational consolidation in some regions, nourishing the disintegrative tendencies of ethnopolitical disunity. ; The main problems and obstacles to ethnonational consolidation of the Ukrainian society are investigated. Among them — the discontent of some ethnos with their status, the level of guaranteeing their rights and interests used outside by means of political, financial and cultural support. The author proves that these mechanisms complicate the process of the Ukrainian society ethnonational consolidation in some regions, nourishing the disintegrative tendencies of ethnopolitical disunity.
The article is analysed of Vyacheslav Lypynski's views, the concept of Ukrainian political nation, the basis of which is love to the native land is developed. Ethnic, political and synthetic concept of the nation are considered, the differences between ethnic and national as dominant components of the Ukrainian national idea are indicated, the components of the modern Ukrainian national idea are proposed. ; The article is analysed of Vyacheslav Lypynski's views, the concept of Ukrainian political nation, the basis of which is love to the native land is developed. Ethnic, political and synthetic concept of the nation are considered, the differences between ethnic and national as dominant components of the Ukrainian national idea are indicated, the components of the modern Ukrainian national idea are proposed.
The article is analysed of Vyacheslav Lypynski's views, the concept of Ukrainian political nation, the basis of which is love to the native land is developed. Ethnic, political and synthetic concept of the nation are considered, the differences between ethnic and national as dominant components of the Ukrainian national idea are indicated, the components of the modern Ukrainian national idea are proposed. ; The article is analysed of Vyacheslav Lypynski's views, the concept of Ukrainian political nation, the basis of which is love to the native land is developed. Ethnic, political and synthetic concept of the nation are considered, the differences between ethnic and national as dominant components of the Ukrainian national idea are indicated, the components of the modern Ukrainian national idea are proposed.
The authors examine the national states development scenarios on the basis of two tendencies – the world government nascence and strengthening of the nation state. The ideas about inevitable formation to the 2000 year of the «world state» in the form of conflict-free and just united society of humanism in 1990-years failed. The possibilities of passing to more humane, just and intelligent society changed to the scenarios of split to parts civilization, contradictions between which were practically impossible to solve.By the end of XX century the determinative feature in investigation of the further existence of a sovereign state investigation becomes an inconsistency of the globalization process, which, despite expectations, at one time integrates and disjoins nations. The 1990s witnessed, that within global governance of the continuous "Shift of power" from governments of nation states to some new supranational structure of international management is not observed. Rather we talk about fundamentally new tendency of world development: at the global level both states and transnational formations own "the part" of power. The capital flows, which are consistently increasing, and products crossing national borders, making them more and more transparent, demand creation of coordinating bodies at the supranational level, but not as a shape of a "world government", but as collective actions of governments of several states. This model propsed by German political scientist W. Beck, is based on the idea of transnational state, namely community of states. The process of globalization provides arguments for supporters of the traditional theory of political realism, who claim, that in future development scenarios the main parts, as previously, belong to strong states and their nation interests, strength of which will be only increasing due to economic integration. The debates are kept only about whom in XXI century the leadership belongs to - traditional Western centers of power or East which grows stronger. ; The authors examine the national states development scenarios on the basis of two tendencies – the world government nascence and strengthening of the nation state. The ideas about inevitable formation to the 2000 year of the «world state» in the form of conflict-free and just united society of humanism in 1990-years failed. The possibilities of passing to more humane, just and intelligent society changed to the scenarios of split to parts civilization, contradictions between which were practically impossible to solve.By the end of XX century the determinative feature in investigation of the further existence of a sovereign state investigation becomes an inconsistency of the globalization process, which, despite expectations, at one time integrates and disjoins nations. The 1990s witnessed, that within global governance of the continuous "Shift of power" from governments of nation states to some new supranational structure of international management is not observed. Rather we talk about fundamentally new tendency of world development: at the global level both states and transnational formations own "the part" of power. The capital flows, which are consistently increasing, and products crossing national borders, making them more and more transparent, demand creation of coordinating bodies at the supranational level, but not as a shape of a "world government", but as collective actions of governments of several states. This model propsed by German political scientist W. Beck, is based on the idea of transnational state, namely community of states. The process of globalization provides arguments for supporters of the traditional theory of political realism, who claim, that in future development scenarios the main parts, as previously, belong to strong states and their nation interests, strength of which will be only increasing due to economic integration. The debates are kept only about whom in XXI century the leadership belongs to - traditional Western centers of power or East which grows stronger.
The authors examine the national states development scenarios on the basis of two tendencies – the world government nascence and strengthening of the nation state. The ideas about inevitable formation to the 2000 year of the «world state» in the form of conflict-free and just united society of humanism in 1990-years failed. The possibilities of passing to more humane, just and intelligent society changed to the scenarios of split to parts civilization, contradictions between which were practically impossible to solve.By the end of XX century the determinative feature in investigation of the further existence of a sovereign state investigation becomes an inconsistency of the globalization process, which, despite expectations, at one time integrates and disjoins nations. The 1990s witnessed, that within global governance of the continuous "Shift of power" from governments of nation states to some new supranational structure of international management is not observed. Rather we talk about fundamentally new tendency of world development: at the global level both states and transnational formations own "the part" of power. The capital flows, which are consistently increasing, and products crossing national borders, making them more and more transparent, demand creation of coordinating bodies at the supranational level, but not as a shape of a "world government", but as collective actions of governments of several states. This model propsed by German political scientist W. Beck, is based on the idea of transnational state, namely community of states. The process of globalization provides arguments for supporters of the traditional theory of political realism, who claim, that in future development scenarios the main parts, as previously, belong to strong states and their nation interests, strength of which will be only increasing due to economic integration. The debates are kept only about whom in XXI century the leadership belongs to - traditional Western centers of power or East which grows stronger. ; The authors examine the national states development scenarios on the basis of two tendencies – the world government nascence and strengthening of the nation state. The ideas about inevitable formation to the 2000 year of the «world state» in the form of conflict-free and just united society of humanism in 1990-years failed. The possibilities of passing to more humane, just and intelligent society changed to the scenarios of split to parts civilization, contradictions between which were practically impossible to solve.By the end of XX century the determinative feature in investigation of the further existence of a sovereign state investigation becomes an inconsistency of the globalization process, which, despite expectations, at one time integrates and disjoins nations. The 1990s witnessed, that within global governance of the continuous "Shift of power" from governments of nation states to some new supranational structure of international management is not observed. Rather we talk about fundamentally new tendency of world development: at the global level both states and transnational formations own "the part" of power. The capital flows, which are consistently increasing, and products crossing national borders, making them more and more transparent, demand creation of coordinating bodies at the supranational level, but not as a shape of a "world government", but as collective actions of governments of several states. This model propsed by German political scientist W. Beck, is based on the idea of transnational state, namely community of states. The process of globalization provides arguments for supporters of the traditional theory of political realism, who claim, that in future development scenarios the main parts, as previously, belong to strong states and their nation interests, strength of which will be only increasing due to economic integration. The debates are kept only about whom in XXI century the leadership belongs to - traditional Western centers of power or East which grows stronger.
