Suchergebnisse

Антропологічний аналіз суб'єкта права у юридичному просторі постмодерну надає підстави для ідентифікації його як Людини присутньої. Він є суб'єктом тотальної рівності, суб'єктом свободи і суб'єктом абсолютних можливостей. Модус його буття в світі – прагматична, автономна, незалежна й формальна присутність. Саме право стає єдиною реальністю його самореалізації, структуризації та способом буття. ; Антропологический анализ субъекта права в юридическом пространстве постмодерна даёт основание для идентификации его как Человека присутствующего. Он является субъектом тотального равенства, субъектом свободы и субъектом абсолютных возможностей. Модус его бытия в мире – прагматичное, автономное, независимое и формальное присутствие. Именно право выступает единственной реальностью его самореализации, структуризации и способом бытия. ; Problem setting. Being of the subject of law in colorable reality today is very difficult. Virtual and dynamical images, values and social institutes require from the subject of activity, creativeness, anonymity and multi-purpose capability. The subject who entirely acquired by these skills and properties, as well as algorithms of legal choice, is adapted well in modern world. It is characterized as the subject of total equality, the subject of freedom, he is the real subject of law. The way of his being in the world is presence – an autonomous, independent, pragmatic and free presence.Recent research and publications analysis. The questions of ontology of law are very popular in modern philosophy. Law theorists discover new forms and modes of being right. They explore qualitatively different ways of being a subject in law. The actual ontological problem today is the "lack of Reality" in the meaning of "primary reality", authenticity, naturalness. The postmodern world is a new Reality, which is called the illusory, virtual and simulative. About this in their works write S. Zizek, J. Bodriar, H. Gumbrecht. At the same time, V. Sorokin states the fact of precisely the loss of the reality of law in postmodern jurisprudence. In his opinion, this negatively affects the law, turns legal regulation into a simulation.A number of philosophers pay attention to anthropological problems in the context of a new simulative reality. Thus, S. Zizek and J. Bodriar view the human culture of postmodernism as an elementary consumer and user, led by selfishness, self-interest, and a thirst for pleasure. L. Usanova, S. Kornev, P. Waibel and other domestic and foreign authors also speak about the virtual way of being of a person. S. Kornev asks the question of individual freedom in the "epoch of performance". P. Waibel is engaged in substantiating the "user paradigm" in modern cognition and creativity. In turn, H. Humbrecht and, following him V. Rybakov consider the mode of presence as the main one for a person simulating in artificial reality. These studies provide rich material from the field of postmodern anthropology, allowing to build a new concept of the subject of law as a Person who is present.Paper objective. The purpose of this study is to compile an anthropological image of a post-human in the status of a subject of law.Paper main body. Superficial meanings and the changeable significance of law today allow us to speak only about its formal presence, but not the real incarnation. Presence is also the main way of being a legal entity. Man's pure presence in many parallel realities relieves him of moral obligations, spirituality and personal responsibility. He is guided by the simple logic of the consumer and fully realizes his freedom of choice. The choice leads to the identification by the subject of himself in a particular social role for a certain period of time. The alternative and dynamic change of roles provide the subject with a productive simulation, successful self-realization and comfort of existence.Thus, it is the subject of law, which, by definition, is deprived of individuality, exclusivity and spirituality is best adapted to modern reality. The subject of law – formal and abstract – is a typical subject-consumer and subject-user of the virtual world. It is the modern subject of law that best personifies the type of Person who is present in postmodern culture.The definition of self and human choice is becoming more and more radical and unexpected. Freedom of the individual stands in the sense of "liberation" from all stereotypes, traditions, statuses, obligations, moral duty, of various belonging – cultural, social, ethnic, sexual, political, ideological or topological belonging. Today, a person independently determines the value and meaning of things, carries out a subjective legal regulation of events. Knowledge of the legal regulation algorithm makes the subject a full-fledged and relevant in the space of total presence and simulation.Conclusions of the research. A pure presence is ontologically convenient for the user, because it is relevant, legal, legitimate, neutral, anonymous, productive, and most importantly, irresponsible although it guarantees freedom. The Person who is present is able to make the most of the possibilities of the environment and their own. It is legal, not ethical abilities that help the comfortable presence of the subject in the space of permanent choice.

Problem setting. This article poses the problem of understanding and applying performance as a conceptual model of the functioning of an individual in a modern multi-layered reality. The study presents an analysis of popular actionist practices and the further development of the pure action ontology. The performance serves as an approbation of the dynamism technique and the principle of action in social, digital and artistic actions. Recent research and publications analysis. The assertion of the principle of dynamism and activity in the modern cultural space explains the popularity of performative topics in a parallel scientific and philosophical discourse. At the same time, the bulk of works on performance relates to the field of theory and methodology of art. These are the works of such authors: G.Elshevskaya, E.Krylova, E.Andreeva, J.Kostincova, D.Filippova, Andrey and Yaroslava Artemenko, H.Petrovsky, S.Levitt, H.Downey and J.Sherry, A.Eckersley and C.Duff. G Reingold, M.Cuellar-Moreno and J.Antonio Cubas-Delgado, A.Loskutov, O.Novoselova and E.Kurbanova and others have studied dynamic models of bodily expressiveness in social practices, including in the information space of culture and communication. In turn, the American philosophers J.Butler, J Dean and G.Standing develop the concept of performance in relation to political actionism. They view the gatherings of social rights agents as a performative practice of their relationship to power. Paper objective. The aim of the study is to review and theoretically analyze modern creative practices of the subject's bodily expression in the field of art, politics, law and digital communication, as well as to further substantiate the methodological role of the performative concept in modern culture. Paper main body. Today's popular installations, happenings, flash mobs and challenge explicates the very essence of modern human existence in the world. Art zones and other creative social spaces (workshops) use direct body language in their functioning and, at the same time, are highly attractive and effective in today's youth environment. Silent actions demonstrate the limited possibilities for a person to manifest themselves, despite the large number of rights, freedoms and technical means to improve life. Defective self-presentation expresses the one-sided and limited nature of the subject's existence in the social, legal, political and cultural space today. The natural change of technological structures, cultural eras and political models in the world irreversibly modifies a person, his environment and the possibilities of self-realization in it. The creative space of action allows to express the conceptual ontological principle of modernity – the break between the physical and the semantic, the act and the commentary, the action and the word, the body and corporeality. In a stratified reality, a person cannot maintain integrity. His verbal-symbolic being is separated from the physical (body); they express themselves and communicate autonomously and independently. Desocialization and the dominance of virtuality led to the dismemberment and impoverishment of many human functions, in particular the localization of his speech and actions. Therefore, performance is becoming an irreplaceable alternative way of self-realization of the silent body. While language remains a way of being a person as an agent of the information environment. Conclusions of the research. Thus, the study refers to the art experience of bodily subjects as a manifestation of their anthropological authenticity, social significance, legal usefulness, epistemological activity and political will. ; Исследование представляет анализ популярных акционистских практик и дальнейшее выстраивание онтологии чистого действия. Апробацией техники динамизма и принципа действия выступает перформанс. Осуществляется проблематизация перформанса в качестве концептуальной модели функционирования индивида в полионтичной реальности. В исследовании происходит обращение к арт-опыту телесных актов субъекта как демонстрации им своей антропологической подлинности, социальной значимости, правовой полноценности, гносеологической активности и политической воли. ; Дослідження являє аналіз популярних акціоністських практик і подальшу побудову онтології чистого дії. Апробацією техніки динамізму і принципу дії виступає перформанс. Здійснюється проблематизація перформансу як концептуальної моделі функціонування індивіда в поліонтичній реальності. У дослідженні відбувається звернення до арт-досвіду тілесних актів суб'єкта як демонстрації ним своєї антропологічної автентичності, соціальної значущості, правової повноцінності, гносеологічної активності і політичної волі.

Problem setting. This article poses the problem of understanding and applying performance as a conceptual model of the functioning of an individual in a modern multi-layered reality. The study presents an analysis of popular actionist practices and the further development of the pure action ontology. The performance serves as an approbation of the dynamism technique and the principle of action in social, digital and artistic actions. Recent research and publications analysis. The assertion of the principle of dynamism and activity in the modern cultural space explains the popularity of performative topics in a parallel scientific and philosophical discourse. At the same time, the bulk of works on performance relates to the field of theory and methodology of art. These are the works of such authors: G.Elshevskaya, E.Krylova, E.Andreeva, J.Kostincova, D.Filippova, Andrey and Yaroslava Artemenko, H.Petrovsky, S.Levitt, H.Downey and J.Sherry, A.Eckersley and C.Duff. G Reingold, M.Cuellar-Moreno and J.Antonio Cubas-Delgado, A.Loskutov, O.Novoselova and E.Kurbanova and others have studied dynamic models of bodily expressiveness in social practices, including in the information space of culture and communication. In turn, the American philosophers J.Butler, J Dean and G.Standing develop the concept of performance in relation to political actionism. They view the gatherings of social rights agents as a performative practice of their relationship to power. Paper objective. The aim of the study is to review and theoretically analyze modern creative practices of the subject's bodily expression in the field of art, politics, law and digital communication, as well as to further substantiate the methodological role of the performative concept in modern culture. Paper main body. Today's popular installations, happenings, flash mobs and challenge explicates the very essence of modern human existence in the world. Art zones and other creative social spaces (workshops) use direct body language in their functioning and, at the same time, are highly attractive and effective in today's youth environment. Silent actions demonstrate the limited possibilities for a person to manifest themselves, despite the large number of rights, freedoms and technical means to improve life. Defective self-presentation expresses the one-sided and limited nature of the subject's existence in the social, legal, political and cultural space today. The natural change of technological structures, cultural eras and political models in the world irreversibly modifies a person, his environment and the possibilities of self-realization in it. The creative space of action allows to express the conceptual ontological principle of modernity – the break between the physical and the semantic, the act and the commentary, the action and the word, the body and corporeality. In a stratified reality, a person cannot maintain integrity. His verbal-symbolic being is separated from the physical (body); they express themselves and communicate autonomously and independently. Desocialization and the dominance of virtuality led to the dismemberment and impoverishment of many human functions, in particular the localization of his speech and actions. Therefore, performance is becoming an irreplaceable alternative way of self-realization of the silent body. While language remains a way of being a person as an agent of the information environment. Conclusions of the research. Thus, the study refers to the art experience of bodily subjects as a manifestation of their anthropological authenticity, social significance, legal usefulness, epistemological activity and political will. ; Исследование представляет анализ популярных акционистских практик и дальнейшее выстраивание онтологии чистого действия. Апробацией техники динамизма и принципа действия выступает перформанс. Осуществляется проблематизация перформанса в качестве концептуальной модели функционирования индивида в полионтичной реальности. В исследовании происходит обращение к арт-опыту телесных актов субъекта как демонстрации им своей антропологической подлинности, социальной значимости, правовой полноценности, гносеологической активности и политической воли. ; Дослідження являє аналіз популярних акціоністських практик і подальшу побудову онтології чистого дії. Апробацією техніки динамізму і принципу дії виступає перформанс. Здійснюється проблематизація перформансу як концептуальної моделі функціонування індивіда в поліонтичній реальності. У дослідженні відбувається звернення до арт-досвіду тілесних актів суб'єкта як демонстрації ним своєї антропологічної автентичності, соціальної значущості, правової повноцінності, гносеологічної активності і політичної волі.

Problem setting. The problem of protecting information freedom and finding its effective means is relevant for many countries. It is important for countries with a totalitarian past. Of particular importance for the protection of information freedom is the activity of non-state institutions. In this regard, it is necessary to develop the conceptual bases of the right to information. Currently, there are no unambiguous approaches to the definition of the essence of the right to information. Considerable attention is paid to the relation between the right to information and other information rights and freedoms. First of all, there is interest in the relation between the right to information and freedom of speech, since the right to information is derived from freedom of speech. The need to institutionalize the right to information actualizes the problem of determining its essence and content by correlating with other similar concepts.Recent research and publications suggest that the problem of the right to information and its relation to freedom of speech is well developed. The right to information is considered as a composite part of the freedom of speech and press. Another approach assumes the independent status of the right to information, as it provides a person with the process of adaptation in society. The right to information acts as a social copy of the traditional freedom of speech. Separately considered the right to information in the context of the right to free access to information. However, no single concept of the right to information has been formulated.Paper objective. The aim of the paper is to attempt a philosophical conceptualization of the human right to information.Paper main body. The right to information is more meaningful than freedom of speech. It is not absorbed by the freedom of speech and is not its element. It implies the right to objective information about events in society, and freedom of speech is aimed at the free circulation of thoughts and positions of particular individuals. For the realization of the right to information, free access to sources of meaningful information is important. And for the exercise of freedom of speech such access is not significant. Freedom of speech provides a free discussion of events in society, and with the help of the right to information, civil society is provided with information for public debates.Of particular note is the relation between the concepts of "right to information" and "freedom of information". Freedom of information is considered as an element of freedom of speech, which consists in the authority to disseminate messages and to receive information freely. On the other hand, the concept of information includes the concepts of "opinion", "free word", "position". It means that freedom of information includes in its content the traditional freedom of speech.In the sphere of information rights, there are active and passive aspects. The right to information can be considered as a passive form of freedom of information, and freedom of speech as active. At the same time, freedom of information in the broad sense includes absolutely all information rights and freedoms of citizens, covers the sphere of communication and information activities. Freedom of communication is the ability of each person to communicate, transmit or receive information. The protection of communication processes through its legalization acts as freedom of information.There are two forms of freedom of information: individual and institutional. Institutional freedom of information includes freedom of the press, broadcasting and freedom of other media. For it, freedom of search and getting information as a basic element in the work of the media is of particular importance. Freedom of information ensures the free and unhindered circulation of information in society and at the same time guarantees non-interference in the sphere of individual information activities of a person.Often the right to information is replaced by the right to access information. From the point of view of constitutional law, this approach is justified, since it is considered as one of the basic political rights. It can be specified as the right to access the official information, often hidden by the authorities. In this regard, it is necessary to develop and specify the obligation of state bodies to provide information to the public. Since the realization of different rights at all levels requires access to relevant information, this right becomes special for a person. Access to sources is a criterion for distinguishing the right to information and freedom of speech. The development of information technologies, which makes real the principle of equal access to information of all interested parties, is essential for this process.It is obvious that the right to information in its content is wider than the right to access information. But the right of access guarantees the realization of the right to information. At the same time, both of these rights perform the same social functions and are terminologically interrelated.Conclusions of the research Thus, the right to information holds a special place among other information rights. This is due to the specifics of its content, object and subject composition, legal properties. But no less significant is the role that the right to information plays in the socio-political practice of the country. Only the right to information actually ensures the interrelation of civil society and the state, gives the individual the status of an active subject of social life and guarantees the mechanisms of democratic responsibility within a democracy. ; Показано, что право на информацию и свобода слова являются двумя обособленными элементами более широкого понятия свободы информации. Право на информацию не поглощается свободою слова, имеет собственную сущность и функцию относительно удовлетворения определенных интересов субъектов. Доказывается, что право на доступ информации гарантирует реализацию более широкого по содержанию права на информацию. Обосновывается потребность комплексного философского изучения информационной свободы человека и ее правового регулирования. ; Показано, що право на інформацію і свобода слова є двома відособленими елементами ширшого поняття свободи інформації. Право на інформацію не поглинається свободою слова, має власну сутність та функцію щодо задоволення певних інтересів суб'єктів. Доводиться, що право на доступ до інформації гарантує реалізацію більш широкого за змістом права на інформацію. Обґрунтовується потреба комплексного філософського вивчення інформаційної свободи людини та її правового регулювання.

Problem setting. The problem of protecting information freedom and finding its effective means is relevant for many countries. It is important for countries with a totalitarian past. Of particular importance for the protection of information freedom is the activity of non-state institutions. In this regard, it is necessary to develop the conceptual bases of the right to information. Currently, there are no unambiguous approaches to the definition of the essence of the right to information. Considerable attention is paid to the relation between the right to information and other information rights and freedoms. First of all, there is interest in the relation between the right to information and freedom of speech, since the right to information is derived from freedom of speech. The need to institutionalize the right to information actualizes the problem of determining its essence and content by correlating with other similar concepts.Recent research and publications suggest that the problem of the right to information and its relation to freedom of speech is well developed. The right to information is considered as a composite part of the freedom of speech and press. Another approach assumes the independent status of the right to information, as it provides a person with the process of adaptation in society. The right to information acts as a social copy of the traditional freedom of speech. Separately considered the right to information in the context of the right to free access to information. However, no single concept of the right to information has been formulated.Paper objective. The aim of the paper is to attempt a philosophical conceptualization of the human right to information.Paper main body. The right to information is more meaningful than freedom of speech. It is not absorbed by the freedom of speech and is not its element. It implies the right to objective information about events in society, and freedom of speech is aimed at the free circulation of thoughts and positions of particular individuals. For the realization of the right to information, free access to sources of meaningful information is important. And for the exercise of freedom of speech such access is not significant. Freedom of speech provides a free discussion of events in society, and with the help of the right to information, civil society is provided with information for public debates.Of particular note is the relation between the concepts of "right to information" and "freedom of information". Freedom of information is considered as an element of freedom of speech, which consists in the authority to disseminate messages and to receive information freely. On the other hand, the concept of information includes the concepts of "opinion", "free word", "position". It means that freedom of information includes in its content the traditional freedom of speech.In the sphere of information rights, there are active and passive aspects. The right to information can be considered as a passive form of freedom of information, and freedom of speech as active. At the same time, freedom of information in the broad sense includes absolutely all information rights and freedoms of citizens, covers the sphere of communication and information activities. Freedom of communication is the ability of each person to communicate, transmit or receive information. The protection of communication processes through its legalization acts as freedom of information.There are two forms of freedom of information: individual and institutional. Institutional freedom of information includes freedom of the press, broadcasting and freedom of other media. For it, freedom of search and getting information as a basic element in the work of the media is of particular importance. Freedom of information ensures the free and unhindered circulation of information in society and at the same time guarantees non-interference in the sphere of individual information activities of a person.Often the right to information is replaced by the right to access information. From the point of view of constitutional law, this approach is justified, since it is considered as one of the basic political rights. It can be specified as the right to access the official information, often hidden by the authorities. In this regard, it is necessary to develop and specify the obligation of state bodies to provide information to the public. Since the realization of different rights at all levels requires access to relevant information, this right becomes special for a person. Access to sources is a criterion for distinguishing the right to information and freedom of speech. The development of information technologies, which makes real the principle of equal access to information of all interested parties, is essential for this process.It is obvious that the right to information in its content is wider than the right to access information. But the right of access guarantees the realization of the right to information. At the same time, both of these rights perform the same social functions and are terminologically interrelated.Conclusions of the research Thus, the right to information holds a special place among other information rights. This is due to the specifics of its content, object and subject composition, legal properties. But no less significant is the role that the right to information plays in the socio-political practice of the country. Only the right to information actually ensures the interrelation of civil society and the state, gives the individual the status of an active subject of social life and guarantees the mechanisms of democratic responsibility within a democracy. ; Показано, что право на информацию и свобода слова являются двумя обособленными элементами более широкого понятия свободы информации. Право на информацию не поглощается свободою слова, имеет собственную сущность и функцию относительно удовлетворения определенных интересов субъектов. Доказывается, что право на доступ информации гарантирует реализацию более широкого по содержанию права на информацию. Обосновывается потребность комплексного философского изучения информационной свободы человека и ее правового регулирования. ; Показано, що право на інформацію і свобода слова є двома відособленими елементами ширшого поняття свободи інформації. Право на інформацію не поглинається свободою слова, має власну сутність та функцію щодо задоволення певних інтересів суб'єктів. Доводиться, що право на доступ до інформації гарантує реалізацію більш широкого за змістом права на інформацію. Обґрунтовується потреба комплексного філософського вивчення інформаційної свободи людини та її правового регулювання.

It is shown that the origins of the modern concept of human rights as the leading political and legal doctrine are in the horizon of the formation of philosophical knowledge. The ideas of the thinkers of antiquity, the Middle Ages and the New Age regarding freedom, equality, justice and human dignity, which constitute the basic principles and values of the concept of human rights, are considered. The genesis of human rights occurs in the context of the development of natural-legal thinking and the search for a balance between individual happiness and public good. It is proved that modern ideas about human rights are based on philosophical concepts, the quintessence of which was the proclamation of the autonomy and freedom of the individual. ; Показано, что истоки современной концепции прав человека как ведущей политико-правовой доктрины пребывают в горизонте формирования философского знания. Рассмотрены идеи мыслителей античности, средневековья и Нового времени относительно свободы, равенства, справедливости и человеческого достоинства, составляющих основные принципы и ценности концепции прав человека. Генезис прав человека происходит в контексте развития естественно-правового мышления и поиска баланса между индивидуальным счастьем и общественным благом. Доказывается, что современные представления о правах человека опираются на философские концепции, квинтэссенцией которых стало провозглашение автономии и свободы отдельной личности. ; Показано, що витоки сучасної концепції прав людини як провідної політико-правової доктрини перебувають в горизонті формування філософського знання. Розглянуто ідеї мислителів античності, середньовіччя та Нового часу щодо свободи, рівності, справедливості та людської гідності, що становлять основні принципи та цінності концепції прав людини. Генезис прав людини відбувається у контексті розвитку природно-правового мислення та пошуку балансу між індивідуальним щастям та суспільним благом. Доводиться, що сучасні уявлення про права людини спираються на філософські концепції, квінтесенцією яких стало проголошення автономії і свободи окремої особистості.

It is shown that the origins of the modern concept of human rights as the leading political and legal doctrine are in the horizon of the formation of philosophical knowledge. The ideas of the thinkers of antiquity, the Middle Ages and the New Age regarding freedom, equality, justice and human dignity, which constitute the basic principles and values of the concept of human rights, are considered. The genesis of human rights occurs in the context of the development of natural-legal thinking and the search for a balance between individual happiness and public good. It is proved that modern ideas about human rights are based on philosophical concepts, the quintessence of which was the proclamation of the autonomy and freedom of the individual. ; Показано, что истоки современной концепции прав человека как ведущей политико-правовой доктрины пребывают в горизонте формирования философского знания. Рассмотрены идеи мыслителей античности, средневековья и Нового времени относительно свободы, равенства, справедливости и человеческого достоинства, составляющих основные принципы и ценности концепции прав человека. Генезис прав человека происходит в контексте развития естественно-правового мышления и поиска баланса между индивидуальным счастьем и общественным благом. Доказывается, что современные представления о правах человека опираются на философские концепции, квинтэссенцией которых стало провозглашение автономии и свободы отдельной личности. ; Показано, що витоки сучасної концепції прав людини як провідної політико-правової доктрини перебувають в горизонті формування філософського знання. Розглянуто ідеї мислителів античності, середньовіччя та Нового часу щодо свободи, рівності, справедливості та людської гідності, що становлять основні принципи та цінності концепції прав людини. Генезис прав людини відбувається у контексті розвитку природно-правового мислення та пошуку балансу між індивідуальним щастям та суспільним благом. Доводиться, що сучасні уявлення про права людини спираються на філософські концепції, квінтесенцією яких стало проголошення автономії і свободи окремої особистості.

Problem setting. The contemporary sociopolitical reality reflects high dynamics of the cultural development and features uncertainty, insecurity unexpectedness, transfer and fragmentation. These conditions transform the traditional views on social and political practices, revisiting individual understanding of identity. To describe cultural process peculiarities, social and humanitarian sciences actively use the performative approach, which allows researchers to focus on the underlying force of human actions and the way they generate cultural senses.While studying social and political actors a major theme is the phenomenon of masses, which testifies to significant changes in political discourse, in particular, the destruction of the traditional channels of political expression.Recent research and publications analysis. In today's conditions of the crisis in interpretation there is a trend to go beyond the meaning and address trans-semiotic elements of the human existence. The process of rethinking the mankind discursive interpretation and sense genesis opens a way to corporeality theories that enable to reproduce subjective experience in the performative paradigm. The study of performatives and their potential to create socially and politically meaningful effects is a promising and insufficiently developed field of research.Paper objective. The research discusses the phenomenon of corporeality as a new practice of political self-expression within the performative approach.Paper main body. The study is devoted to the contemporary research into the problems of corporeality and its role in the political discourse.Structural and post-structural philosophy understands reality as a text and, respectively, focuses on the communicative role of the language and the interpretational nature of human-world relations. This semiotic discourse substitutes the sense with meaning. It was shown that the discourse approach, based on the link between the world and the language, interpretations, exchange of meanings and their production in the human world building does not consider the opportunities of the trans-semiotic experience.It was confirmed that the conceptualization of new political practices in the conditions of world rewriting by itself is a most important theme in the modern philosophy and it sets the task to search for new approaches to the issue of a political subject as an agent. It was demonstrated that one of these approaches emerges in the theory of performativity. Under the conditions of corporal communication a performance is the means of personality expression, the way to enter communication, which implies certain attitude and understanding from other communicators.The paper deals with the prospect of considering political issues, given in the performative paradigm and followed in the works by Judith Butler, and other researchers of the new political realm. It was particularly shown that the body as a discursive field always has a political perspective. Therefore, the work dwells on the concepts of gathering, power, precarity, democracy, justice, sources of corporeality politicization etc. It was emphasized that the phenomenon of going out into the street, caused by the vulnerability and dramatism of personal stories, requires considering such motives, and also reflecting on the conditions and ways of accepting political attitude on the whole.Conclusions of the research. The conventional political articulation is being replaced by the density of corporeality and performance, which is, in turn, becoming a new driver of political processes. One of the versions of the political subject is gathering unlike masses, parties and people. This approach outlines a broad field of research into the new political language for contemporary political practices. ; Статья посвящена современным исследованиям проблематики телесности и ее роли в политическом дискурсе. Показано, что в условиях телесной коммуникации перформативный акт становится средством проявления индивидуальности, способом вхождения в коммуникацию, в том числе, политическую. Рассмотрена перспектива проблематизации политического, заданного перформативной парадигмой и продолженного в работах Джудит Батлер, а также других исследователей новой политической реальности. Рассмотрены концепты собрания, власти, прекарности, демократии, источников политизации телесности и пр. Особое внимание обращено на то, что феномен выхода людей на улицу, вызванный уязвимостью и драматизмом личных историй, заставляет принимать во внимание такие побудительные мотивы, а также осмысливать условия и способы принятия политической позиции как таковой. ; Стаття присвячена сучасним дослідженням проблематики тілесності та її ролі у політичному дискурсі. Показано, що в умовах тілесної комунікації перформативний акт стає засобом прояву індивідуальності, способом входження у комунікацію, у тому числі, політичну. Розглянута перспектива проблематизації політичного, задана перформативною парадигмою та продовжена у працях Джудіт Батлер, а також інших дослідників нової політичної реальності. Розглянуті концепти зібрання, влади, прекарності, демократії, етичні джерела політизації тілесності тощо. Особливу увагу звернено на те, що феномен виходу людей на вулицю, спричинений уразливістю та драматизмом особистих історій, змушує брати до уваги такі спонукальні мотиви, а також осмислювати умови та способи прийняття політичної позиції як такої.