Suchergebnisse

Legal support of the sphere of culture is one of the main issues in the study of problems of state cultural policy. This is primarily due to the recognition of legislation as an effective policy mechanism of the state in the field of culture and the main lever of its implementation in society. The legal regulation of cultural policy in Ukraine during the period of independence is carried out in complex and contradictory conditions of social stratification, transformation of human perceptions of values, and the absence of a nation-wide consolidating idea. Therefore, in such conditions, of course, the role of the cultural component of society necessarily increases. Because culture is the social foundation and core that can ensure the stability of the development of society, consolidate the state and society in solving the most important issues and problems. It should be noted that the legal regulation of cultural policy is a permanent and extremely fast and dynamic process of achieving the goals, which involves various state authorities and civil society institutions. An integral part of the implementation of such a policy is to determine the mechanism for its implementation, which includes a set of tools, methods and resources that ensure the implementation of planned activities in accordance with the objectives. Thus, the reform of the whole sphere of culture and its legal provision is one of the main tasks of both humanitarian policy and the policy of socio-economic development of Ukraine, the construction of a modern democratic state on the basis of universal values, preserving original traditions and cultural and historical values. As well as qualitative updating of the institutional and legal framework of the state cultural policy, rapid and effective changes in the creation of a new model of management and the search for effective mechanisms corresponding to the current financing needs, the cultural policy will remain unsystematic and suffering from the political situation, does not correspond to the social ...

The cultural potential of society is the resource that can ensure the success of reforms, act as a guarantee of national consolidation and security. Unfortunately, the attitude of culture on the principle of "residual" and "secondary" continues to dominate among the domestic managerial and political elite. Therefore, one of the priorities of state cultural policy in overcoming the socio-economic crisis is to form a qualitatively new cultural policy that can preserve the unity of society in this crisis by ensuring access of broad sections of the population to cultural values. The formation of such a policy is not possible without the creation of strategic documents that would determine the priorities of public authorities and local governments in the cultural sphere. Much is said about this in expert circles, but today there is no agreed conceptual vision of the foundations of the new cultural policy. Any public policy, including cultural, can be defined as a system of laws, regulatory measures, specific actions and funding priorities in a particular area (sector) implemented by public authorities. The main lever of public policy is legislation. Not surprisingly, public policy discussions tend to be about laws and resource allocation. Regardless of the content of cultural policy and the attitude to culture in general, public authorities and administrations have at their disposal a set of tools for the formulation and implementation of this policy. In fact, these tools are the common tools that governments use in any field ; У статті висвітлюються пріоритетні завдання державної культурної політики України періоду незалежності, вказані основні особливості та недоліки культурної політики сьогодення. Надано аналіз правового забезпечення країн Європейського Союзу та незалежної України.

У статті аналізуються основні методологічні підходи до змісту та критеріїв сучасної державної культурної політики. Більш детально розглядається, чим є для України модернізація в умовах глобалізації.Ключові слова: культура, державна культурна політика, модернізація, глобалізація. В статье анализируются основные методологические подходы к содержанию и критериям современной государственной культурной политики. Более подробно рассматривается значение для Украины модернизации в условиях глобализации. Ключевые слова: культура, государственная культурная политика, модернизация, глобализация. This article analyzes the basic methodological approaches to the content and criteria of the modern state cultural policy. More detail is seen that for the modernization of Ukraine in the context of globalization. Theoretical bases and methods of work have the complex, synthetic character predetermined by relative novelty of the put perspective, its chronological updating, direct proximity to that period when there is its research, the practical present of the public phenomena which are studied. They are constructed on study, comparison, and the critical analysis of the generalizing philosophical, culturological, politological, economic, historical literature, scientific works in which the main achievements and shortcomings of the first decade of the Ukrainian independence are considered, their reasons, factors of historical or social processes, internal mentally psychological, or external globally political, ideological and economic influences are highlighted. Key methodological points are concepts of globalization and modernization, understanding of that fact that globalization already became a major factor of life and development of humanity.Keywords: culture, national cultural policy, modernization and globalization.

У статті аналізується система прийняття концептуальних рішень органами державної влади, щодо основних напрямів культурної політики в перші роки побудови незалежної української держави (1991-2001 рр.).Ключові слова: культура, культурна політика, культурна сфера, органи державної влади, культурне будівництво, законодавча база. В статье анализируется система принятия концептуальных решений органами государственной власти относительно основных направлений культурной политики в первые годы построения независимого украинского государства (1991-2001гг.).Ключевые слова: культура, культурная политика, культурная сфера, органы государственной власти, культурное строительство, законодательная база.This article analyzes the conceptual system of decision-making by public authorities, on the main areas of cultural policy in the early years of the creation of an independent Ukrainian state (1991-2001 years).Key words: culture, cultural policy, cultural, public authorities, cultural construction, legislation.

У статті висвітлюються деякі аспекти регулювання державної культурної політики України періоду незалежності, вказані основні особливості та недоліки культурної політики сьогодення. Надано аналіз правового забезпечення країн Європейського Союзу та незалежної України.Ключові слова: правове забезпечення, правове регулювання, незалежна Україна, культура, законодавча база, нормативно-правові документи, Закон України, правові акти. В статье освещаются некоторые аспекты регулирования государственной культурной политики Украины периода независимости, указаны основные особенности и недостатки культурной политики современности. Дан анализ правового обеспечения стран Европейского Союза и независимой Украины.Ключевые слова: правовое обеспечение, правовое регулирование, независимая Украина, культура, законодательная база, нормативно-правовые документы, Закон Украины, правовые акты. Legal support of the sphere of culture is one of the main issues in the study of problems of state cultural policy. This is primarily due to the recognition of legislation as an effective policy mechanism of the state in the field of culture and the main lever of its implementation in society. The legal regulation of cultural policy in Ukraine during the period of independence is carried out in complex and contradictory conditions of social stratification, transformation of human perceptions of values, and the absence of a nation-wide consolidating idea. Therefore, in such conditions, of course, the role of the cultural component of society necessarily increases. Because culture is the social foundation and core that can ensure the stability of the development of society, consolidate the state and society in solving the most important issues and problems. It should be noted that the legal regulation of cultural policy is a permanent and extremely fast and dynamic process of achieving the goals, which involves various state authorities and civil society institutions. An integral part of the implementation of such a policy is to determine the mechanism for its implementation, which in-cludes a set of tools, methods and resources that ensure the implementation of planned activities in accordance with the objectives. Thus, the reform of the whole sphere of culture and its legal provision is one of the main tasks of both humanitarian policy and the policy of socio-economic development of Ukraine, the construction of a modern democratic state on the basis of universal values, preserving original traditions and cultural and historical values. As well as qualitative updating of the institutional and legal framework of the state cultural policy, rapid and effective changes in the creation of a new model of management and the search for effective mechanisms corresponding to the current financing needs, the cultural policy will remain unsystematic and suffering from the political situation, does not correspond to the social request Ukrainian dynamically developing society. One of the most important directions of such reforms should be the decentralization of cultural policy, which will help to overcome inequalities in the cultural development of the country's regions, the construction of Ukrainian national identity, and the consolidation of the European progress of our country.Key words: legal support, legal regulation, independent Ukraine, culture, legislative base, normative-legal documents, the Law of Ukraine, legal acts.

Cultural policy of independent Ukraine in the first decade of its existence wasformed in difficult political, economic, historical and cultural circumstances. Thearticle analyzes the system of decision making conceptual state authorities, on themain areas of cultural policy in the early years of building an independent UkrainianState (1991-2001 biennium).Culture Industry in the day revolutionary process has always been the mostfavorable on progressive change. And if ideological changes in Ukraine in the earlyyears of building an independent state (1991-2001 gg.) Were stormy, bright andvisible, the structural transformation of the organizational culture of publicadministration, its funding, creation of an appropriate framework zakono¬davchoyioccurred slowly, not always logically and scientifically justified.The study of these processes, the analysis of the response of the main branchesof the central government to tackle the crisis in the national culture and its reform,has considerable practical value, the results may be considered legislators, publicadministrators, heads of institutions and cultural institutions.Therefore, the analysis of major general rulemaking government agencies inbuilding priorities, consistency adoption and implementation of political decisions inthe cultural sphere in the first decade of independence Ukraine has becomeincreasingly necessary. These documents are the foundation historiographical scienceto understand the subject of achievements, strengths and weaknesses in the area ofcultural development during this period.All branch showed significant activity in the cultural sphere, reissuinglegislative framework addressing current problems, create new institutions or changethe status of the old and more. The main thing – the study of how this is done, howconsciously with which ideological load, for what purpose (declared or unconscious)the consequences resulted. All legislative acts of the time were full reflection of thecontradictions of perestroika era that influenced public policy in the cultural sphere inUkraine and creation of a new culture independent state in the study period. ; В статье анализируется система принятия концептуальных решений органами государственной власти относительно основных направлений культурной политики в первые годы построения независимого украинского государства (1991–2001 гг.) ; Проаналізовано систему прийняття концептуальних рішень органами державної влади з основних напрямів культурної політики в перші роки побудови незалежної Української держави (1991–2001 рр.)

Cultural policy of independent Ukraine in the first decade of its existence wasformed in difficult political, economic, historical and cultural circumstances. Thearticle analyzes the system of decision making conceptual state authorities, on themain areas of cultural policy in the early years of building an independent UkrainianState (1991-2001 biennium).Culture Industry in the day revolutionary process has always been the mostfavorable on progressive change. And if ideological changes in Ukraine in the earlyyears of building an independent state (1991-2001 gg.) Were stormy, bright andvisible, the structural transformation of the organizational culture of publicadministration, its funding, creation of an appropriate framework zakono¬davchoyioccurred slowly, not always logically and scientifically justified.The study of these processes, the analysis of the response of the main branchesof the central government to tackle the crisis in the national culture and its reform,has considerable practical value, the results may be considered legislators, publicadministrators, heads of institutions and cultural institutions.Therefore, the analysis of major general rulemaking government agencies inbuilding priorities, consistency adoption and implementation of political decisions inthe cultural sphere in the first decade of independence Ukraine has becomeincreasingly necessary. These documents are the foundation historiographical scienceto understand the subject of achievements, strengths and weaknesses in the area ofcultural development during this period.All branch showed significant activity in the cultural sphere, reissuinglegislative framework addressing current problems, create new institutions or changethe status of the old and more. The main thing – the study of how this is done, howconsciously with which ideological load, for what purpose (declared or unconscious)the consequences resulted. All legislative acts of the time were full reflection of thecontradictions of perestroika era that influenced public policy in the cultural sphere inUkraine and creation of a new culture independent state in the study period. ; В статье анализируется система принятия концептуальных решений органами государственной власти относительно основных направлений культурной политики в первые годы построения независимого украинского государства (1991–2001 гг.) ; Проаналізовано систему прийняття концептуальних рішень органами державної влади з основних напрямів культурної політики в перші роки побудови незалежної Української держави (1991–2001 рр.)

Cultural policy of independent Ukraine in the first decade of its existence wasformed in difficult political, economic, historical and cultural circumstances. Thearticle analyzes the system of decision making conceptual state authorities, on themain areas of cultural policy in the early years of building an independent UkrainianState (1991-2001 biennium).Culture Industry in the day revolutionary process has always been the mostfavorable on progressive change. And if ideological changes in Ukraine in the earlyyears of building an independent state (1991-2001 gg.) Were stormy, bright andvisible, the structural transformation of the organizational culture of publicadministration, its funding, creation of an appropriate framework zakono¬davchoyioccurred slowly, not always logically and scientifically justified.The study of these processes, the analysis of the response of the main branchesof the central government to tackle the crisis in the national culture and its reform,has considerable practical value, the results may be considered legislators, publicadministrators, heads of institutions and cultural institutions.Therefore, the analysis of major general rulemaking government agencies inbuilding priorities, consistency adoption and implementation of political decisions inthe cultural sphere in the first decade of independence Ukraine has becomeincreasingly necessary. These documents are the foundation historiographical scienceto understand the subject of achievements, strengths and weaknesses in the area ofcultural development during this period.All branch showed significant activity in the cultural sphere, reissuinglegislative framework addressing current problems, create new institutions or changethe status of the old and more. The main thing – the study of how this is done, howconsciously with which ideological load, for what purpose (declared or unconscious)the consequences resulted. All legislative acts of the time were full reflection of thecontradictions of perestroika era that influenced public policy in the cultural sphere inUkraine and creation of a new culture independent state in the study period. ; В статье анализируется система принятия концептуальных решений органами государственной власти относительно основных направлений культурной политики в первые годы построения независимого украинского государства (1991–2001 гг.) ; Проаналізовано систему прийняття концептуальних рішень органами державної влади з основних напрямів культурної політики в перші роки побудови незалежної Української держави (1991–2001 рр.)

Problem Setting. The article examines the Soviet heritage in the culture of independent Ukrain be late 80s early 90s of the XX century. The main aspects of the first legislative acts concerning the reform of the Ukrainian culture are analyzed, namely: "Declaration Ukraine" and "Fundamentals of Ukraine on culture".Analysis of the recent researches and publications. The cultural politics of independent Ukraine in the first years of its existence was formed in the complex political, economic, historical and cultural circumstances. Recalling with horror and pain of the inhuman conditions in which workers find themselves in the cultural sphere, institutions and enterprise culture in the 1990s to find out the objective and subjective reasons for this state of affairs. Paper main body. Preventing beforehand, it should be noted that the cultural processes in the independent Ukraine evolved is not quite the way envisioned in recent years of "perestroika" educationist, literary figures, figures of culture, all socially active and nationally conscious intiligencia. The article investigates the State of the cultural development of Soviet times and the realities of culture at the beginning of Ukrainian independence. And also analyses the main provisions of the first legislative acts concerning the reform of the Ukrainian culture. Namely: "Declaration on State sovereignty of Ukraine", "Declaration of rights of nationalities of Ukraine "and" fundamentals of legislation on culture".Conclusions. So, at the moment of formation of the State independence of objective reality demanded immediate legislative reform in the field of culture. It should be remembered that the history of Ukrainian culture period of late 80's-early 90-ies. was formed under the influence of long-term cultural denationalization as part of Imperial Russia, and in the period of USSR. At the time of adoption of the necessary legislative decisions of the cultural history of Ukraine had no other idea of the formation of the national independent Cathedral States formed an idea of national identity by virtue of the variety of cultures, polyethnic population and language differences between the major regions of the country. What about making the first legal State acts of independent Ukraine, built solely on humanistic and democratic ideas to reform the culture bore or declaratory or is not feasible at that time in nature. Thus, I must say that the only real democratic development of the country and the effective legislation of the possible reform and further development of Ukrainian culture. ; В статье исследуется советское наследие в культуре независимой Украины конца 80-х начала 90-х гг. ХХ в. Анализируются основные положения Декларации о государственном суверенитете Украины, Декларации прав национальностей Украины и Основ законодательства Украины о культуре, касающиеся развития культуры. ; У статті досліджується радянський спадок у культурі незалежної України кінця 80-х – початку 90-х рр. ХХ ст. Аналізуються основні положення Декларації про державний суверенітет України, Декларації прав національностей України та Основ законодавства України про культуру щодо розвитку культури.

У статті досліджується радянський спадок у культурі незалежної України кінця 80-х – початку 90-х рр. ХХ ст. Аналізуються основні положення Декларації про державний суверенітет України, Декларації прав національностей України та Основ законодавства України про культуру щодо розвитку культури. ; В статье исследуется советское наследие в культуре независимой Украины конца 80-х начала 90-х гг. ХХ в. Анализируются основные положения Декларации о государственном суверенитете Украины, Декларации прав национальностей Украины и Основ законодательства Украины о культуре, касающиеся развития культуры. ; Problem Setting. The article examines the Soviet heritage in the culture of independent Ukrain be late 80s early 90s of the XX century. The main aspects of the first legislative acts concerning the reform of the Ukrainian culture are analyzed, namely: "Declaration Ukraine" and "Fundamentals of Ukraine on culture".Analysis of the recent researches and publications. The cultural politics of independent Ukraine in the first years of its existence was formed in the complex political, economic, historical and cultural circumstances. Recalling with horror and pain of the inhuman conditions in which workers find themselves in the cultural sphere, institutions and enterprise culture in the 1990s to find out the objective and subjective reasons for this state of affairs. Paper main body. Preventing beforehand, it should be noted that the cultural processes in the independent Ukraine evolved is not quite the way envisioned in recent years of "perestroika" educationist, literary figures, figures of culture, all socially active and nationally conscious intiligencia. The article investigates the State of the cultural development of Soviet times and the realities of culture at the beginning of Ukrainian independence. And also analyses the main provisions of the first legislative acts concerning the reform of the Ukrainian culture. Namely: "Declaration on State sovereignty of Ukraine", "Declaration of rights of nationalities of Ukraine "and" fundamentals of legislation on culture".Conclusions. So, at the moment of formation of the State independence of objective reality demanded immediate legislative reform in the field of culture. It should be remembered that the history of Ukrainian culture period of late 80's-early 90-ies. was formed under the influence of long-term cultural denationalization as part of Imperial Russia, and in the period of USSR. At the time of adoption of the necessary legislative decisions of the cultural history of Ukraine had no other idea of the formation of the national independent Cathedral States formed an idea of national identity by virtue of the variety of cultures, polyethnic population and language differences between the major regions of the country. What about making the first legal State acts of independent Ukraine, built solely on humanistic and democratic ideas to reform the culture bore or declaratory or is not feasible at that time in nature. Thus, I must say that the only real democratic development of the country and the effective legislation of the possible reform and further development of Ukrainian culture.