РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА В ОТНОШЕНИИ СЕЛЬСКО-ГОРОДСКИХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ
Рассматриваются основные характеристики региональной микрополитики как средства решения проблем сельско-городских территорий специфических территориальных образований, соединяющих в себе как городские, так и сельские черты. Микрополитика рассматривается через призму взаимодействия населения территорий с органами власти. ; The rural-urban territories are settlements or parts of settlements, the population of which is not entirely urban or rural. The rural-urban territories are workers' settlements, private sector in towns, villages in urban area, suburbs. The most painful social problems of rural-urban territories, as Kuzbass experience proves, are the lack or deficit of necessary social and engineer infrastructure, housing problem, ecological problems, unemployment problems, asocial behaviour of population. The problems of rural-urban territories are resolved at the regional policy level indirectly. Regional policy is use of power for solving territorial arrangement problems, providing the social and political development of the population and supporting of relationship balance between different subjects of social-political interaction. Social character (orientation) of regional policy is the condition for resolving the rural-urban territorial problems. A variety of regional and municipal policies at the low settlement level is micropolicy. It is characterized by immediately exercised self-organization of population, initiatives of local communities, and interrelations between power bodies and population for realization of specific rural-urban territories functions. The problem of usage of the tools of regional policy in a region is that rural-urban territories, which are the low level of social-settlement of the population of localized territories. Regional micropolicy is not possible without strong interrelationship between different state and municipal power structures not only with rural authorities, but also with inhabitants of localized territories. The starting point of micropolicy is the differentiation of population and untying the social bundles in difficult living circumstances in living places. Micropolicy becomes evident, when subjects of state policy penetrate to localized territorial formations through the mediator level of local self-government. The social development of territories orients on interaction between power bodies and population. The active participation of population in realization of regional policy allows making additional corrections in it. However, at present the population sees local selfgovernment as the lowest level in state power system, as the main tool for local development, not as an independent level of power. The main ways to solve rural-urban territorial problems through the mechanisms of regional policy are: organization of interaction between municipal and regional authorities and nongovernmental organizations; program-goal support of rural-urban territories for overcoming the disproportion in social development; interaction between local authorities and local communities for resolving socially significant problems; strengthening of civil society elements through the direct connection of public elements and administrative efforts for development of civil and political culture of the population.