Search results

The article investigates comparative legal analysis of constitutional basics regarding perception, recognition, ensuring and observance of individuals' legal status in some Post-Soviet Union countries like Lithuania, Estonia, and others. A wide list of individuals' legal status named in the Main Law of Russia and other Post-Soviet Union countries as the highest social values has been criticized. Attention has been drawn to the fact that constitutions of the Russian Federation, Tadzhikistan and Uzbekistan have the most developed provisions on the legal status of individuals among Post-Soviet Union countries. The main laws of Latvia and Estonia have more declaratory provisions. There is a positive tendency to vest Estonian State Court with the function of constitutional supervision when Turkmen legislators do not even focus on this problem. The authors support the idea of having the Supreme Court with constitutional, anti-criminal, administrative, labor, civil and commercial chambers. This system should be represented at regional courts and local courts should be specialized. It has been underlined that there were numerous violations based on corruption and lack of professionalism during two stages of contest to the cassation court and anti-corruption court of 07.11.2016 and 02.08.2018. As a result, "judges" of these courts did not acquire legitimacy and guarantees of judicial activity. Following this the President of Ukraine should cancel the results of the contest by his order and initiate a re-contest and not re-attestation which is initiated by the party "People's Servant" empowering the same corrupt officials and non-professionals.

The article deals with the cancellation of criminal results regarding two stages of competition of 07.11.2016 and 02.08.2018 dedicating to establishment of cassation courts, anti-corruption court and its appellate chamber. It was proposed to the President of the state to cancel these results and initiate a full restart of the High Qualification Commission of Judges, the Supreme Council of Justice and conduct a new competition. It has been proved that the opening of a land market contradicts the Constitution of Ukraine which states that the land, its subsoil and other natural resources within the territory of Ukraine shall be the objects of property rights of Ukrainian people, and by allowing the sale of land even through referendum will be abuse of powers and will make such type of law which allow buy sell agreements of land null and void. It has been underlined that obtaining of prostitute services is a rape if such acts are committed not based on love and sexual attraction but the order and preparation for these "services" by parliamentary members during working hours is an essential violation of labour discipline and parliamentary ethics. As a result, the President of Ukraine being a Guarantor for observance of the Main and other laws as well as legal status of all the citizens within the main obligation of the state to establish and maintain the rights and freedoms of citizens should terminate beforehand the powers of such parliamentary members who miss the sessions of the parliament or its committees without a reason, lobby draft laws and commit other essential violations of labor discipline, parliamentary ethics which damage the parliamentary member, his/her electors, the parliament and the state. The President of the state should apply any means to prevent non-legitimate actions and/or decisions and/or legal acts of authorities and requirement of p. 2 of Art. 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine which obliges the authorities to act only on the grounds, within the powers, and in the way determined by the ...