Search results
Filter
50 results
Sort by:
Private Rights and Public Autonomy in a Fragmented World: Why an Institutional Perspective on Intellectual Property and Competition Laws Matters
In: GRUR international: Journal of European and International IP Law, Volume 72, Issue 3, p. 207-208
ISSN: 2632-8550
Extraterritorial protection of human rights in value chains
In: Common market law review, Volume 59, Issue Special Issue, p. 143-154
ISSN: 1875-8320
Das bürgerliche Recht in der bundesstaatlichen Ordnung
In: JuristenZeitung, Volume 76, Issue 1, p. 7
Zu Gerhard Wagner, Mietendeckel ohne Kompetenzgrundlage, JZ 2021, 247
In: JuristenZeitung, Volume 76, Issue 5, p. 251
Eine »ungeheure Jurisprudenz«?
In: Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, Volume 68, Issue 1, p. 471
ISSN: 2569-4103
Unternehmen als Grundrechtssubjekte
In: Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, Volume 65, Issue 1, p. 113
ISSN: 2569-4103
Public supply of optional standardized consumer contracts: A rationale for the Common European Sales Law?
In: Common Market Law Review, Volume 50, Issue Special Issue, p. 11-27
ISSN: 0165-0750
Byreadingthe B2C partofthe Common European Sales Law (CESL) as a supplyof optional standardizedcontracts, thisarticletriestogivetheCommission'sproposalthebestpossible rationale. In contrasttoconventionalcontractcodescharacterizedbyloosebundlesofdefaultrulesthepartiesmayselectively stick toordivergefrom, an optional standardizedcontractis a tightbundleofdefaultruleswith a nameattachedto it. As optional standardizedcontractsaresimplyidentifiablebytheirlabel, theycantheoreticallysolvetheproblemofreadingcostsandthusavoidadverseselection. This ideahelpstomake sense ofthe rigid internalstructureofthe CESL thatgenerallyexcludescherry-picking. Fromthisperspective, itis also unobjectionableforthe CESL toaimat an upscalesegmentofconsumersbyoffering a high levelofprotection (leadingtocorrespondingly high prices). However, welfare-increasingeffectscanonlybeexpectedif Member States, third States and private organizationsareallowedtojointhecompetitionbyprovidingotherstandardizedcontracts. As theregulatoryframeworkcreatedbythe EU (choice-of-lawrestrictionforconsumercontractsandsubstantiveharmonizationof Member State laws) ties down all potential competitors, theseeffectswill not materialize. This leadstotheconclusionthattheCommissionis not seriouslypursuingtheideaof an optional law, but ultimatelymeanstopre-empt Member States' lawswithitsproposal.
Introductory Note
In: Common Market Law Review, Volume 50, Issue Special Issue, p. 1-2
ISSN: 0165-0750
Introductory note
In: Common market law review, Volume 50, Issue 1, p. 1-2
ISSN: 0165-0750
Public supply of optional standardized consumer contracts: A rationale for the Common European Sales Law?
In: Common market law review, Volume 50, Issue 1, p. 11-27
ISSN: 0165-0750
Public supply of optional standardized consumer contracts: A rationale for the Common European Sales Law?
In: Common market law review, Volume 50, Issue 1-2, p. 11-27
ISSN: 0165-0750
Consumer Protection and the Role of Advice in the Market for Retail Financial Services
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Volume 167, Issue 1, p. 22
ISSN: 1614-0559
A Legal Theory without Law. Posner v. Hayek on Economic Analysis of Law
In: JuristenZeitung, Volume 63, Issue 3, p. 139
Case C-148/02, Carlos Garcia Avello v. État Belge
In: Common Market Law Review, Volume 44, Issue 1, p. 141-154
ISSN: 0165-0750