Article (print)
Holidays in the danger zone: entanglements of war and tourism. By Debbie Lisle (2016)
in: International affairs, Volume 92, Issue 6, p. 1530-1531
ISSN: 0020-5850
1
in: International affairs, Volume 92, Issue 6, p. 1530-1531
ISSN: 0020-5850
1
in: International affairs, Volume 92, Issue 5, p. 1147-1166
ISSN: 0020-5850
2
in: International affairs, Volume 91, Issue 3, p. 642-644
ISSN: 0020-5850
3
in: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 43, Issue 2, p. 584-597
ISSN: 0305-8298
4
in: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 43, Issue 2, p. 660-683
ISSN: 0305-8298
5
in: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Volume 38, Issue 5, p. 1732-1748
ISSN: 0309-1317
6
in: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Volume 19, Issue 3, p. 481-498
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846
7
World Affairs Online
in: Review of international studies: RIS, Volume 39, Issue 4, p. 835-857
ISSN: 0260-2105
8
World Affairs Online
in: Peace & change: a journal of peace research, Volume 37, Issue 1, p. 122-151
ISSN: 0149-0508
9
in: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Volume 36, Issue 2, p. 381-400
ISSN: 0309-1317
10
in: Diplomacy & statecraft, Volume 22, Issue 3, p. 521-540
ISSN: 0959-2296
11
in: Peace & change: a journal of peace research, Volume 35, Issue 2, p. 328-353
ISSN: 0149-0508
12
in: Alternatives: global, local, political, Volume 35, Issue 4, p. 425-449
ISSN: 0304-3754
13
in: SAIS Review, Volume 29, Issue 2, p. 175-178
14
in: The Whitehead journal of diplomacy and international relations, Volume 10, Issue 1, p. 111-121
ISSN: 1538-6589
The international system faces two antithetical transnational forces. On the one hand, there is globalization, and on the other a prevalent rise in nationalist and sovereign claims emerging as a backlash to the growing net of transnational relations. Subsequently and following the revolution in individualization since the Cold War, individuals now have more than one social affiliation, and their affiliative choices are taken increasingly autonomously. With their presence in processes of foreign affairs, public demands can no longer be overlooked. The present article discusses the governmental and NGO actors of fundamental freedom across the globe, international advocacy aimed at either reaching global agreements, or at pointing out violations, and public diplomacy as the gray area between human rights and diplomatic practice. The second part of the article has for subject the interplay between foreign policy and human rights, and the improvement of human rights mediation. O. van Zijl
15