Suchergebnisse
Filter
50 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Do African Voters Favor Coethnics? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Benin
In: Journal of experimental political science: JEPS, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-11
ISSN: 2052-2649
AbstractCan African politicians play the ethnic card? Ethnicity matters for a host of outcomes in Africa, but debate remains about the extent to which it motivates the African voter. In experimental settings, we know that ethnicity shapes political support for hypothetical candidates. This paper offers an experimental test of the extent to which ethnicity shapes political support for actual, real-world politicians. Relying on Benin's mixed-ethnicity President, this paper proposes a survey experiment that measures the independent effect of coethnic cues in boosting support across both coethnic groups. The results reveal that coethnic cues work: the same political actor can draw support from two different ethnic groups based solely on subtle ethnic cues.
Do African Voters Favor Co-Ethnics? A New Identification Strategy
SSRN
Working paper
Too close for comfort?: Immigrant exclusion in Africa
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 10, S. 1370-1396
ISSN: 0010-4140
World Affairs Online
Too Close for Comfort? Immigrant Exclusion in Africa
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 10, S. 1370-1396
ISSN: 1552-3829
Why do some immigrant minorities in the developing world integrate into their host societies whereas others face exclusion and hostility? This article offers new insights on the determinants of political identity and group relations in ethnically diverse societies through the lens of South-to-South migration. Using original data from surveys and interviews collected during 12 months of field research in West Africa and a unique empirical strategy that allows for single-group cross-country and single-country cross-group comparisons, this article tests the relationship between cultural proximity and immigrant exclusion. The analysis indicates that cultural similarities between immigrants and their hosts may limit immigrant integration because they motivate community leaders to highlight group boundaries. The results shed light on immigrant exclusion in Africa and contribute to the debate on the determinants of political identity in ethnically diverse societies.
Too Close for Comfort? Immigrant Exclusion in Africa
In: Comparative Political Studies, Band 44, Heft 10
SSRN
Do Migrants Improve Their Hometowns? Remittances and Access to Public Services in Mexico, 1995-2000
In: Comparative Political Studies, Band 20, Heft 10
SSRN
Why (Some) Immigrants Resist Assimilation: US Racism and the African Immigrant Experience
In: Quarterly journal of political science: QJPS, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 295-338
ISSN: 1554-0634
Do migrants improve their hometowns?: Remittances and access to public services in Mexico, 1995-2000
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 3-27
ISSN: 0010-4140
World Affairs Online
Do Migrants Improve Their Hometowns? Remittances and Access to Public Services in Mexico, 1995-2000
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 3-27
ISSN: 1552-3829
How do citizens in developing countries access public services? Scholars study this question by emphasizing the role of government, measuring government performance as household access to public services, such as clean water and sanitation. However, the authors argue that the state does not hold a monopoly on provision of such utilities: Citizens in developing countries often turn to nonstate providers for basic utilities. In Mexico, the authors find that direct money transfers from migrants, known as remittances, are used to provide household access to public services. The statistical analysis across Mexico's 2,438 municipalities demonstrates that citizens improve their own access. The results also contribute new evidence to the literature on remittances and development by offering a micro-level explanation for how remittances affect both the availability and the source of basic utilities. The findings suggest that the measures scholars typically associate with government performance may in fact capture nonstate provision of basic utilities. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright holder.]
Do Migrants Improve Their Hometowns? Remittances and Access to Public Services in Mexico, 1995-2000
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 3-27
ISSN: 1552-3829
How do citizens in developing countries access public services? Scholars study this question by emphasizing the role of government, measuring government performance as household access to public services, such as clean water and sanitation. However, the authors argue that the state does not hold a monopoly on provision of such utilities: Citizens in developing countries often turn to nonstate providers for basic utilities. In Mexico, the authors find that direct money transfers from migrants, known as remittances, are used to provide household access to public services. The statistical analysis across Mexico's 2,438 municipalities demonstrates that citizens improve their own access. The results also contribute new evidence to the literature on remittances and development by offering a micro-level explanation for how remittances affect both the availability and the source of basic utilities. The findings suggest that the measures scholars typically associate with government performance may in fact capture nonstate provision of basic utilities.
Engendering Empathy, Begetting Backlash: American Attitudes toward Syrian Refugees
In: Stanford-Zurich Immigration Policy Lab Working Paper No. 17-01
SSRN
Working paper
Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump's election
What types of refugees do Americans prefer for admission into the United States? Scholars have explored the immigrant characteristics that appeal to Americans and the characteristics that Europeans prioritize in asylum-seekers, but we currently do not know which refugee characteristics Americans prefer. We conduct a conjoint experiment on a representative sample of 1800 US adults, manipulating refugee attributes in pairs of Syrian refugee profiles, and ask respondents to rate each refugee's appeal. Our focus on Syrian refugees in a 2016 survey experiment allows us to speak to the concurrent refugee crisis on the eve of a polarizing election, while also identifying religious discrimination, holding constant the refugee's national origin. We find that Americans prefer Syrian refugees who are female, high-skilled, English-speaking, and Christian, suggesting they prioritize refugee integration into the U.S. labor and cultural markets. We find that the preference for female refugees is not driven by the desire to exclude Muslim male refugees, casting doubt that American preferences at the time were motivated by security concerns. Finally, we find that anti-Muslim bias in refugee preferences varies in magnitude across key subgroups, though it prevails across all sample demographics.
BASE
Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees
Social scientists have shown how easily individuals are moved to exclude outgroup members. Can we foster inclusion instead? This study leverages one of the most significant humanitarian crises of our time to test whether, and under what conditions, American citizens adopt more inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees. We conduct a nationally representative survey of over 5,000 American citizens in the weeks leading up to the 2016 presidential election and experimentally test whether a perspective-taking exercise increases inclusionary behavior in the form of an anonymous letter supportive of refugees to be sent to the 45th President of the United States. Our results indicate that the perspective-taking message increases the likelihood of writing such a positive letter by two to five percentage points. By contrast, an informational message had no significant effect on letter writing. The effect of the perspective-taking exercise occurs in the short run only, manifests as a behavioral rather than an attitudinal response, and is strongest among Democrats. However, this effect also appears in the subset of Republican respondents, suggesting that efforts to promote perspective taking may move to action a wide cross-section of individuals.
BASE
Ethnic Cueing across Minorities: A Survey Experiment on Candidate Evaluation in the United States
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 80, Heft 4, S. 815-836
ISSN: 1537-5331