Introduction: The Meaning and Metaphors of New Age Globalization 1. Conceptual Framework for Exploring New Age Globalization 2. Global Population and Demographic Trends 3. The Global Economy (or Economic Globalization) 4. Global Ecological/Environmental System 5. The Global Political System (or Political Globalization) 6. Global Conflicts 7. Globalization of Culture (or Cultural Globalization) 8. Globalization of Knowledge, Science, and Technology 9. World Religions
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
This article highlights some facts and fallacies about globalization, with a particular reference to the global economy. To explain what is globalization and what it is not is critical both theoretically and practically for nations, corporations, and communities to benefit from it and avoid its negative consequences. Some historical antecedents of globalization and the interactive nature of its structures and processes are highlighted in this article. The analysis is expected to benefit scholars, practitioners, and agents of social change interested and involved directly or indirectly in the impacts and processes of globalization.
In: Journal of applied sociology - Sociological practice: a journal of applied and clinical sociology ; an official publication of the Association for Applied and Clinical Sociology, Band os-20, Heft 2, S. 42-64
Using an interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspective, this study explores the dynamics of conflict and its resolution in a group of American professional organizations. The analysis is performed on a convenience sample of 318 professionals. The context for the study covers seminal studies on organizational conflict in national and international settings. Issues explored include the prevalence and intensity of conflict; relationships among power, cliques, and conflict; the use of non-professional decision criteria in professional decisions and their implications for conflict; and conflict resolution styles. The results point out several new directions that may contribute toward the development of a more comprehensive social-psychological theory of organizational conflict.
In: Journal of applied sociology - Sociological practice: a journal of applied and clinical sociology ; an official publication of the Association for Applied and Clinical Sociology, Band os-20, Heft 1, S. 1-35
This work is based on the assumption that youth violence continues to be a serious problem in American society. It is exacerbated by the history of violence, cultural factors, and the nature and quality of interpersonal relations encountered by youth in their daily lives. The metaphor of "a nation at war with itself" is used to highlight the fact that more Americans are regularly killed by other Americans at home than those killed in foreign wars. These conditions set the stage for the development of a psycho-social model of youth violence in America today. The model is a take-off from the author's earlier hypothesis that all violence may be construed as a powerful reaction to overcome powerlessness. It identifies four correlates of powerlessness: disconnection, anonymity, selfishness, and lack of adult-youth communication about violence. These variables are subsequently integrated into an explanatory and predictive device for one category of violence only, homicides committed by youth. The model may, however, apply to other categories of interpersonal violence as well. It is dedicated to the urgent task of curbing youth violence in America, and by implication, in other similar cultural contexts.
Examines nonviolent resistance as a potentially powerful reaction to powerlessness in the US. The nonviolent movements of Mahatma Ghandi & Martin Luther King, Jr., are briefly reviewed. An increased concentration of power across the globe in the near future is expected to lead to an increase in both violent & nonviolent resistance, suggesting that teaching the importance of nonviolence is critical for future generations. 7 References. M. Nichols-Wagner
Developing countries today face serious dilemmas regarding introduction of new technologies for development. Their need for a wide variety of technologies is increasing rapidly. Lacking expertise and experience, they find it hard to determine the appropriateness of technological alternatives in terms of cost, quality, scale, degree of sophistication, risk of failure, and environmental risks. Having made certain choices may sometimes compound problems rather than solve them, particularly if the chosen technology happens to be an advanced technology (to be) acquired from abroad, involving high costs and high risks. Criteria and mechanisms for evaluating appropriateness of the needed or chosen technologies before and after their intro duction have not been fully developed in most developing countries. This article discusses these issues in light of the contemporary experience of Third World societies and suggests some measures to help incorporate technology assessment in the policy and planning apparatus at various levels.