Growth determinants in low-income and emerging Asia: A comparative analysis
In: Asia Pacific development journal, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 1-22
ISSN: 2411-9873
38 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Asia Pacific development journal, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 1-22
ISSN: 2411-9873
In: IMF Working Paper, S. 1-36
SSRN
In: IMF Working Papers
We extend the literature on budget deficits and interest rates in three ways: we examine both advanced and emerging economies and for the first time a large emerging market panel; explore interactions to explain some of the heterogeneity in the literature; and apply system GMM. There is overall a highly significant positive effect of budget deficits on interest rates, but the effect depends on interaction terms and is only significant under one of several conditions: deficits are high, mostly domestically financed, or interact with high domestic debt; financial openness is low; interest rates
In: IMF Working Papers, S. 1-25
SSRN
In: IMF Working Papers, S. 1-19
SSRN
In: European Journal of Political Economy, Band 29, S. 151-167
In: European Journal of Political Economy, Band 29, Heft 1
SSRN
In: European journal of political economy, Band 29, S. 151-167
ISSN: 0176-2680
The purpose of this paper is to empirically determine the effects of political instability on economic growth. By using the system-GMM estimator for linear dynamic panel data models on a sample covering up to 169 countries, and 5-year periods from 1960 to 2004, we find that higher degrees of political instability are associated with lower growth rates of GDP per capita. Regarding the channels of transmission, we find that political instability adversely affects growth by lowering the rates of productivity growth and, to a smaller degree, physical and human capital accumulation. Finally, economic freedom and ethnic homogeneity are beneficial to growth, while democracy may have a small negative effect. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.]
The purpose of this paper is to empirically determine the effects of political instability on economic growth. Using the system-GMM estimator for linear dynamic panel data models on a sample covering up to 169 countries, and 5-year periods from 1960 to 2004, we find that higher degrees of political instability are associated with lower growth rates of GDP per capita. Regarding the channels of transmission, we find that political instability adversely affects growth by lowering the rates of productivity growth and, to a smaller degree, physical and human capital accumulation. Finally, economic freedom and ethnic homogeneity are beneficial to growth, while democracy may have a small negative ...
BASE
In: IMF Working Papers, S. 1-28
SSRN
The purpose of this paper is to empirically determine the effects of political instability on economic growth. Using the system-GMM estimator for linear dynamic panel data models on a sample covering up to 169 countries, and 5-year periods from 1960 to 2004, we find that higher degrees of political instability are associated with lower growth rates of GDP per capita. Regarding the channels of transmission, we find that political instability adversely affects growth by lowering the rates of productivity growth and, to a smaller degree, physical and human capital accumulation. Finally, economic freedom and ethnic homogeneity are beneficial to growth, while democracy may have a small negative effect. ; info:eu-repo/semantics/published
BASE
The purpose of this paper is to empirically determine the effects of political instability on economic growth. Using the system-GMM estimator for linear dynamic panel data models on a sample covering up to 169 countries, and 5-year periods from 1960 to 2004, we find that higher degrees of political instability are associated with lower growth rates of GDP per capita. Regarding the channels of transmission, we find that political instability adversely affects growth by lowering the rates of productivity growth and, to a smaller degree, physical and human capital accumulation. Finally, economic freedom and ethnic homogeneity are beneficial to growth, while democracy may have a small negative effect. ; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) - Programa Operacional Ciência e Inovação 2010 (POCI 2010) ; Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional ...
BASE
In: NIPE Working Paper No. 5/2010
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of development economics, Band 87, Heft 1, S. 29-50
ISSN: 0304-3878
While most economists agree that seigniorage is one way governments finance deficits, there is less agreement about the political, institutional and economic reasons for relying on it. This paper investigates the main political and institutional determinants of seigniorage using panel data on about 100 countries, for the period 1960–1999. Estimates show that greater political instability leads to higher seigniorage, especially in developing, less democratic and socially-polarized countries, with high inflation, low access to domestic and external debt financing and with higher turnover of central bank presidents. One important policy implication of this study is the need to develop institutions conducive to greater political stability as a means to reduce the reliance on seigniorage financing of public deficits. ; The authors acknowledge the helpful comments from Christopher Bowdler, Juan Jauregui, Delfim Neto, Carlos Végh, Robert Flood, Paolo Mauro, various staff members from the International Monetary Fund, two anonymous referees, and the editor, Lant Pritchett. We also thank Reid Click for sharing his data on creditworthiness ratings. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Francisco Veiga wishes to thank the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for research grant POCI/EGE/55423/2004 (partially funded by ...
BASE