Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Diskursmuster 3
In: Diskursmuster 3
In: Diskursmuster - Discourse Patterns 3
In: Landauer Beiträge zur Kultur- und Sozialgeschichte Band 4
In: European journal of politics and gender, S. 1-25
ISSN: 2515-1096
Germany is a prime example of a country where the use of gender-sensitive language is the subject of public controversy and debate. This study provides a quantitative content analysis of all (N = 72) German televised debates aired on the federal and state level from 1997 until 2022 to explore the determinants of the use of gender-sensitive language by political candidates. We find that the use of gender-sensitive language has increased over time, but the effect is small and not robust. Party affiliation correlates with candidates' linguistic behaviour, indicating that conservative candidates use less gender-sensitive language. Candidates' gender and party affiliation, as well as parties' socio-political positions, interact in predicting the use of gender-sensitive language. Candidates also change their use of gender-sensitive language from one debate to another. Compared to liberal/left-wing candidates, these changes are less likely to be associated with an increase in gender-sensitive language for conservative candidates.
In: Perino , A , Pereira , H M , Felipe-Lucia , M , Kim , H J , Kühl , H S , Marselle , M R , Meya , J N , Meyer , C , Navarro , L M , van Klink , R , Albert , G , Barratt , C D , Bruelheide , H , Cao , Y , Chamoin , A , Darbi , M , Dornelas , M , Eisenhauer , N , Essl , F , Farwig , N , Förster , J , Freyhof , J , Geschke , J , Gottschall , F , Guerra , C , Haase , P , Hickler , T , Jacob , U , Kastner , T , Korell , L , Kühn , I , Lehmann , G U C , Lenzner , B , Marques , A , Motivans Švara , E , Quintero , L C , Pacheco , A , Popp , A , Rouet-Leduc , J , Schnabel , F , Siebert , J , Staude , I R , Trogisch , S , Švara , V , Svenning , J C , Pe'er , G , Raab , K , Rakosy , D , Vandewalle , M , Werner , A S , Wirth , C , Xu , H , Yu , D , Zinngrebe , Y & Bonn , A 2022 , ' Biodiversity post-2020 : Closing the gap between global targets and national-level implementation ' , Conservation Letters , vol. 15 , no. 2 , e12848 . https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12848
National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change.
BASE
National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change.
BASE
This work is based on a workshop funded by iDiv via the German Research Foundation (DFG FZT 118 and 202548816). ; National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change. ; Publisher PDF ; Peer reviewed
BASE