O tribună captivantă: televiziune, ideologie, societate în România socialistă (1965 - 1983)
In: Istoria timpului prezent
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Istoria timpului prezent
In: Transilvania, S. 1-6
In this article, we state that research on Roland Barthes is generally divided into two branches. On one hand, there are studies devoted to unearth how Barthes responds to contradictions opposing his projects, his ideas about literature and modernity and how literature and language really function in his contemporary social world. On the other hand, researchers try to follow the dialectics of his own work as embedded in the history of the 20th century and in different national or regional readings. We consider that the second approach has to be developed furthermore, mainly from the vantage point of East European researchers who are now able to reconsider Barthes' entire work in the light of their own historical and intellectual experience and to revisit its political dimension.
The Post-Modern East, or How Can We Be 'Post-Modern without Postmodernity' and without Lyotard? Despite the idea of the universality of 'postmodernism' as a new stage in the Western World, it is now clear that the term was coined, launched, adopted or rejected differently in different places, along local historical lines. Hence, we have not only an American and a European postmodernism, but also an East European postmodernism, what we shall call the Post-Modern East. We delineate its characteristics based on a survey that looked at how East European cultures adopted and discussed postmodernism around the moment that their socialist regimes were collapsing. We focus the analysis on a particular but synthetising version of the 'postmodern', specifically that of Lyotard. We hold that Lyotard is one of the few intellectuals who succeeded in thinking of politics, sociology, epistemology and aesthetics as tying together to form 'postmodernity'; and that a few European intellectuals were ready to think of 'postmodernity' an epistemic challenge, beyond the distinction between soft and hard sciences. A fortiori, Eastern European cultures seized 'postmodernism' as an American fetish and identified the breakdown of totalitarianism as the achievement of happy 'postmodernisation'. Thirty years later, these countries have realised that by embracing a certain version of 'postmodern', as they had done by the end of the 1980s, was generally a mimetic utopian gesture that needs revaluation.
BASE
In: Questions de communication, Heft 31, S. 461-463
ISSN: 2259-8901
In: Questions de communication, Heft 28, S. 305-306
ISSN: 2259-8901
In: Le temps des médias: revue d'histoire, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 227-234
ISSN: 2104-3671
In: Metacritic journal for comparative studies and theory: mj, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 58-82
ISSN: 2457-8827
During the Middle Ages, integumentum was a term widely used by "intellectuals" (Le Goff) in order to unfold the function of allegory: there is no story whose signification does not echo the sacred texts, and every sacred truth needs a story to bring it to life. Integumentum was a way to make this echo explicit: a sort of "poetical coat hiding a moral or philosophical truth" (John of Garland). We want to suggest that, while no one uses integumentum anymore in order to designate the rhetoric of modern and contemporary theoretical discourse, it is in ecological theory that we may rediscover its afterlives. Hence, integumentum is not only a form of telling truths, but a form of memory, as well. In this respect, Michel Serres may be considered the first "ecological" thinker, as he avoids abstract metalanguages as much as possible, relying instead on fictions and characters in his attempt to describe the world afresh. If integumentum resurfaces as the proper way of "ecologizing," instead of modernizing (Latour), we would like to uncover, in Michel Serres' works, the dialectic of subjects and objects.
Deliverable D7.3 Dialogue Breakfast is the result of implementing Subtask 7.5.1 (with the same name). The initial subtask proposed a "dialogue with European policy-makers in Brussels" and was initially scheduled for M24 (May 2020). The restrictions imposed around Europe and Brussels, as a result of the COVID-19 health crisis made it impossible to have this event in person in the spring of 2020. Following the consultations with the project coordinator and the EU project officer, the deliverable was postponed to M31 (December 2020) and the format was changed to an online event. The topic of the Dialogue Breakfast was defined in cooperation with the RURITAGE project consortium taking in account "the relevant issues at stake at that moment". Considering that: (1) the process of defining the new Programming Period 2021-2027 was in its last phase, (2) in general local actors have a low awareness of Smart Specialisation concept and RIS3 processes and (3) many Regions are starting the process of updating their RIS3, it was concluded that, linking the topic of RIS3 and CNH was very useful both for the RURITAGE partners but also for other EU organisations. Therefore, the Dialogue Breakfast aimed to bring in contact the experts and organisations working on RIS3 with the experts and organisations working on CNH, which until now are not naturally and strongly linked. In order to do this ICLEI Europe organised bilateral interviews with key experts and organisations from both professional spheres. These had helped to identify the key subtopics, challenges and opportunities. Finally, yet importantly, the knowledge received in implementing this subtask will be used as the starting point for organising the workshop with the representatives of the Board of Regions and the Policy Recommendations proposed under Task 6.5. Therefore we will be able to create synergy. Below you can read about the knowledge exchanged and ideas shared by the speakers.
BASE
In: Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai. Philologia, Band 67, Heft 3, S. 205-216
ISSN: 2065-9652
"Ambivalences of a Tour de Force: Istoria Literaturii Române Contemporane as Critique and as Literature. This essay starts from hypothesizing a double dimension of Mihai Iovănel's History: critical and literary (or, as Matei says, poetic). The idea of such an interpretation is given by Iovănel's quoting a late text by Louis Althusser, in which the French philosopher defines the figure of an "aleatory materialist," as opposed to a "dialectical" materialist. While critics have already discussed the critical dimension of Iovănel's project, an aspect Matei also examines in the last part of his contribution, less has been said, he maintains, about the History as a literary project, as "writing." Matei thus attends to the qualities and shortcomings of Iovănel's project, which stem, he claims, from the aforementioned double dimension of the History. Keywords: Mihai Iovănel, poetics of literary history, aleatory materialism, contemporary Romanian literature"
In: The International Conference 'Education and Creativity for a Knowledge-Based Society' ISSN: 2248-0064 ISBN: 978-3-9503145
SSRN