Methods in the Study of Collective Action Phenomena
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 165-185
ISSN: 1940-1183
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 165-185
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 249
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 417-445
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 44, Heft 6, S. 897-921
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 7
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 141-183
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: American political science review, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 611-618
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 29, Heft 6, S. 688-706
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 211
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 141-182
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 447-490
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: American political science review, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 735-760
ISSN: 1537-5943
Terms denoting political attitudes, such as 'conservative,' 'liberal,' 'radical,' and 'reactionary,' have long been familiar both in popular usage and in the language of political science. Though sufficiently understood for ordinary discourse, their use is likely to lead to a confusion between a political opinion and the type of person who holds the opinion. There is considerable agreement as to what is meant by a radical view; but is there such a thing as a radical type of personality? If there is, we need a method for the measurement and identification of such individuals. If not (and psychologists are becoming increasingly suspicious of type classifications), we must ask what psychological characteristics in individuals are the most likely to produce a radical trend in political and social convictions. The same observation holds for the other familiar attitudes upon public questions.A logical procedure would seem to be, first, to measure the distribution of public opinion in a representative sample, and secondly, to select from the various regions of this distribution (conservative, radical, and the like) a sufficient number of individuals for detailed study of the motives and traits of their personalities which give rise to the opinions they hold. This paper will be devoted to a preliminary report on the results of such a study.
In: The journal of psychology: interdisciplinary and applied, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 197-233
ISSN: 1940-1019
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 217-224
ISSN: 1940-1183