Suchergebnisse

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-016-1839-z ; Link analysis is highly effective in detecting relationships between different institutions, relationships that are stronger the greater their geographical proximity. We therefore decided to apply an interlinking analysis to a set of geographically dispersed research entities and to compare the results with the co-authorship patterns between these institutions in order to determine how, and if, these two techniques might reveal complementary insights. We set out to study the specific sector of public health in Spain, a country with a high degree of regional autonomy. We recorded all Spanish health entities (and their corresponding URLs) that belong to, and were hyperlinked from, the national government or any of the regional governments, gathering a total of 263 URLs. After considering their suitability for web metric analysis, interlinking scores between all valid URLs were obtained. In addition, the number of co-authored articles by each pair of institutions and the total scientific output per institution were retrieved from Scopus. Both interlinking and co-authorship methods detect the existence of strength subnets of geographically distributed nodes (especially the Catalan entities) as well as their high connectivity with the main national network nodes (subnet of nodes distributed according to dependence on national government, in this case Spain). However, the resulting interlinking pattern shows a low but significant correlation (r = 0.5) with scientific co-authorship patterns. The existence of institutions that are strongly interlinked but with limited scientific collaboration (and vice versa) reveals that links within this network are not accurately reflecting existing scientific collaborations, due to inconsistent web content development. ; Ontalba Ruipérez, JA.; Orduña Malea, E.; Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). Identifying institutional relationships in a geographically distributed public health system using ...

1167 1191 106 3 ; S ; The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-016-1839-z Link analysis is highly effective in detecting relationships between different institutions, relationships that are stronger the greater their geographical proximity. We therefore decided to apply an interlinking analysis to a set of geographically dispersed research entities and to compare the results with the co-authorship patterns between these institutions in order to determine how, and if, these two techniques might reveal complementary insights. We set out to study the specific sector of public health in Spain, a country with a high degree of regional autonomy. We recorded all Spanish health entities (and their corresponding URLs) that belong to, and were hyperlinked from, the national government or any of the regional governments, gathering a total of 263 URLs. After considering their suitability for web metric analysis, interlinking scores between all valid URLs were obtained. In addition, the number of co-authored articles by each pair of institutions and the total scientific output per institution were retrieved from Scopus. Both interlinking and co-authorship methods detect the existence of strength subnets of geographically distributed nodes (especially the Catalan entities) as well as their high connectivity with the main national network nodes (subnet of nodes distributed according to dependence on national government, in this case Spain). However, the resulting interlinking pattern shows a low but significant correlation (r = 0.5) with scientific co-authorship patterns. The existence of institutions that are strongly interlinked but with limited scientific collaboration (and vice versa) reveals that links within this network are not accurately reflecting existing scientific collaborations, due to inconsistent web content development. Ontalba Ruipérez, JA.; Orduña Malea, E.; Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). Identifying institutional relationships in a geographically distributed public ...

Peer reviewed ; This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Reuse for Sustainable Development Goals. This work provides an overview of a Spanish survey on research data, which was carried out within the framework of the project Datasea at the beginning of 2015. It is covered by the objectives of sustainable development (goal 9) to support the research. The purpose of the study was to identify the habits and current experiences of Spanish researchers in the health sciences in relation to the management and sharing of raw research data. Method: An electronic questionnaire composed of 40 questions divided into three blocks was designed. The three Section s contained questions on the following aspects: (A) personal information; (B) creation and reuse of data; and (C) preservation of data. The questionnaire was sent by email to a list of universities in Spain to be distributed among their researchers and professors. A total of 1063 researchers completed the questionnaire. More than half of the respondents (54.9%) lacked a data management plan; nearly a quarter had storage systems for the research group; 81.5% used personal computers to store data; "Contact with colleagues" was the most frequent means used to locate and access other researchers' data; and nearly 60% of researchers stated their data were available to the research group and collaborating colleagues. The main fears about sharing were legal questions (47.9%), misuse or interpretation of data (42.7%), and loss of authorship (28.7%). The results allow us to understand the state of data sharing among Spanish researchers and can serve as a basis to identify the needs of researchers to share data, optimize existing infrastructure, and promote data sharing among those who do not practice it yet. This research was funded by National R+D+I of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government (projects: CSO2012-39632-C02-01 and CSO2015-65594-C2-2-R) and the 2015-Networks of Excellence Call (project CSO2015-71867-REDT).

This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Reuse for Sustainable Development Goals. ; This work provides an overview of a Spanish survey on research data, which was carried out within the framework of the project Datasea at the beginning of 2015. It is covered by the objectives of sustainable development (goal 9) to support the research. The purpose of the study was to identify the habits and current experiences of Spanish researchers in the health sciences in relation to the management and sharing of raw research data. Method: An electronic questionnaire composed of 40 questions divided into three blocks was designed. The three Section s contained questions on the following aspects: (A) personal information; (B) creation and reuse of data; and (C) preservation of data. The questionnaire was sent by email to a list of universities in Spain to be distributed among their researchers and professors. A total of 1063 researchers completed the questionnaire. More than half of the respondents (54.9%) lacked a data management plan; nearly a quarter had storage systems for the research group; 81.5% used personal computers to store data; "Contact with colleagues" was the most frequent means used to locate and access other researchers' data; and nearly 60% of researchers stated their data were available to the research group and collaborating colleagues. The main fears about sharing were legal questions (47.9%), misuse or interpretation of data (42.7%), and loss of authorship (28.7%). The results allow us to understand the state of data sharing among Spanish researchers and can serve as a basis to identify the needs of researchers to share data, optimize existing infrastructure, and promote data sharing among those who do not practice it yet. ; This research was funded by National R+D+I of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government (projects: CSO2012-39632-C02-01 and CSO2015-65594-C2-2-R) and the 2015-Networks of Excellence Call (project CSO2015-71867-REDT). ; Peer reviewed

[EN] This work provides an overview of a Spanish survey on research data, which was carried out within the framework of the project Datasea at the beginning of 2015. It is covered by the objectives of sustainable development (goal 9) to support the research. The purpose of the study was to identify the habits and current experiences of Spanish researchers in the health sciences in relation to the management and sharing of raw research data. Method: An electronic questionnaire composed of 40 questions divided into three blocks was designed. The three Section s contained questions on the following aspects: (A) personal information; (B) creation and reuse of data; and (C) preservation of data. The questionnaire was sent by email to a list of universities in Spain to be distributed among their researchers and professors. A total of 1063 researchers completed the questionnaire. More than half of the respondents (54.9%) lacked a data management plan; nearly a quarter had storage systems for the research group; 81.5% used personal computers to store data; "Contact with colleagues" was the most frequent means used to locate and access other researchers' data; and nearly 60% of researchers stated their data were available to the research group and collaborating colleagues. The main fears about sharing were legal questions (47.9%), misuse or interpretation of data (42.7%), and loss of authorship (28.7%). The results allow us to understand the state of data sharing among Spanish researchers and can serve as a basis to identify the needs of researchers to share data, optimize existing infrastructure, and promote data sharing among those who do not practice it yet. ; This research was funded by National R+D+I of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government (projects: CSO2012-39632-C02-01 and CSO2015-65594-C2-2-R) and the 2015-Networks of Excellence Call (project CSO2015-71867-REDT). The APC was not funded. ; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Vidal-Infer, A.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.; Peset Mancebo, MF.; Ferrer ...

[EN] Sharing research data is an increasingly necessary requirement for the advancement of science. The aim of this study was to analyse the policies on openness in sharing scientific research data in substance abuse journals. Journals included in the Substance abuse area of the Journal Citation Reports were used for the analysis, with reference to the instructions to authors published on the journals websites. In 67.6% of the journals, it is possible to store materials in thematic or institutional repositories; 47% accept supplemental material; 64.7% allow the reuse of data, and 41.2% admit the publication of their data on a website. Most journals recommend that authors deposit their data in a repository, but they do not provide clear instructions for doing so. No association was found between the value of a journal s impact factor and the storage and reuse. PubMed Central is the repository primarily suggested for deposit. ; This work has benefited from assistance by the National R+D+I of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government, the Mapfre Foundation and Plan Municipal de Drogodependencias from Valencia municipality, Spain. ; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Vidal-Infer, A.; Alonso Arroyo, A.; Valderrama Zurian, JC.; Bueno Cañigral, F.; Ferrer Sapena, A. (2014). Public availability of published research data in substance abuse journals. International Journal of Drug Policy. 25(6):1143-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.007 ; S ; 1143 ; 1146 ; 25 ; 6

[ES]: [Objetivo]: Analizar las fuentes de financiación de publicaciones biomédicas tomando como modelo artículos de excelencia en tabaquismo en los que participaron autores españoles (2008 a 2012) a través de la Web of Science (WoS). Método: La búsqueda se realizó en SCI-E y en el SSCI a través de la plataforma WoS en noviembre de 2013 empleando los descriptores "smok*" OR "tobac*". Los artículos de excelencia fueron escogidos en función del índice h. [Resultados]: Recibieron financiación 60, de los 65 documentos totales, con 183 instituciones financiadoras diferentes. Se observó un descenso progresivo de la financiación pública (66,2% en 2008 vs 43,4% en 2012) y un incremento de la privada (16,9% en 2008 vs 30,2% en 2012) y de la de sociedades científicas y universidades (16,9% en 2008 vs 26,4% en 2012) (p=0,001). La media del número de documentos fue significativamente mayor en el área geográfica de la Unión Europea (UE, 13 ± 4) frente a EEUU (5 ± 1) y el Foro Asia-Pacífico (5 ± 3) (p < 0,001). La UE recibió un mayor número de citas (138 ± 62; p < 0,05). [Conclusiones]: Financiación externa mayoritaria, con disminución de la financiación pública e incremento de la privada. Se encontró un mayor número de trabajos provenientes de la UE. Predominio de países de la UE formando una red de colaboración cohesionada. ; [EN]: The aim was to analyze the funding for Spanish author's excellence original articles in Smoking during the years 2008-2012, using the Web of Science. [Method]: The bibliographic search was conducted in SCI-E and SSCI platform [Web of Science (Thomson Reuters)] in November of 2013 (period 2008-2012, for original articles and reviews). The search strategy used was "smok*" OR "tobac*". Articles having an h index of the complete sample strategy were selected (number of articles that had at least that number of citations). [Results]: Of the 65 total records 60 received funding, with 183 different funding institutions. We found a decreased of the Public Funding (66,2% in 2008 vs 43,4% in 2012), but Private Funding (16,9% in 2008 vs 30,2% in 2012) and Scientific Societies and University Funding (16,9% in 2008 vs 26,4% in 2012) increased (p = 0.001). The average number of documents was significantly higher in the geographical area of the European Union (EU, 13 ± 4) against the US (5 ± 1) and the Asia Pacific Forum (5 ± 3) (p <0.001). Normalizing for years find that the EU received a higher number of citations (138 ± 62; p=0,024). [Conclusions]: Majority external funding, with reduced public funding and increased private. Predominance of EU countries and the US to form a cohesive network of collaboration. ; Peer Reviewed