Suchergebnisse

Despite its adherence to the principles of democracy, Indonesia is currently trapped in conditions and situations over the emergence of a new government system based on Islam. The notion of extremism dominates society, both the general public and the political elite, and has even infiltrated the youth via the education system. Community mobilization movements in the name of religion in the political sphere indicate that extremism has spread and is gaining strength. The main focus of this research is to make a clearer distinction between radicalism and extremism from both a political and religious perspective. To answer this problem, this paper clarifies the meaning of the terms "extreme" and "radical" in the context of religious politics from the point of view of democracy and distinguishes the signs for the two dimensions of extremism and radicalism. Not only that, in this study there are also explanations related to religious phenomena which basically have an indirect relationship with politics and extremism. This study approach uses a qualitative method taken from the study of Borum and Schmid. It argues that the difference between extremism and radicalism rests on the existence of an ideology. Radicalism is a form of process in which there is agreement or disagreement on violence in tactical and temporal considerations, while the concept of extremism is considered a motive.

In the growing international agreements as a consequence of Indonesia's wider participation in the global community, the existence of free market harms the domestic industrial sector, especially to the community. The number of treaties which have been ratified by the government considered as incomparable to the losses incurred, particularly to the possibility of human rights violations of information dysfunction, and the lack of public participation as well as evaluation functions. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach where data is obtained from primary and secondary data. The purpose of this study is to find out the conceptual and practical considerations faced in the possibility of violations of human rights. Moreover, the article also addresses the form of diplomacy carried out by the public regarding several government policies in the Free Trade Agreement and its relations to human rights. The study suggests that the government must guarantee human rights by involving affected communities as a form of collective understanding. Furthermore, the government must also monitor, evaluate, assess, as well as strengthen the communication from various stakeholders to eliminate the hidden costs that can harm the community.

This paper seeks to examine cyber resilience of small and medium enterprises of handicraft under the scheme of Semarang City smart economy platform. It finds out whether the enterprises well prepared for the cyber system and has the ability to employ the facilities provided by the government and whether the government provided adequate governance and legal framework to provide secure environment that supports the development of cyber resilience in smart public services. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method which employs both in-depth interviews for the primary data and statute approach for the secondary data on analysis of governance and legal frameworks provided by the government to support cyber resilience and how the opportunities and challenges could be addressed to establish robust cyber resilience. The results of the study show that the concept of cyber resilience in Smart City for SMEs with specific references to the city of Semarang is still poorly understood by businesspeople and stakeholders in the field. Moreover, smart city as a place of various aspects such as economy hasn't had clear legal framework regarding smartcity at the national level.