Stated Preferences and Decision-Making: Three Applications to Health
In: Revue économique, Band 68, Heft 3, S. 327-333
ISSN: 1950-6694
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Revue économique, Band 68, Heft 3, S. 327-333
ISSN: 1950-6694
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 111-130
ISSN: 1573-1502
In this paper, we propose a behavioural approach to determine the extent to which the consumer/citizen distinction affects interpretations of monetary values. We perform a field experiment dealing with air pollution, where some (randomly selected) subjects are given the opportunity to behave politically by signing a petition for environmental protection prior to stating their private preferences in a standard contingent valuation exercise. We show that the petition has the potential to influence respondents' willingness to pay and that whether the effect is negative or positive depends on the degree of (dis)similarity between the petition and the scenario in which willingness to pay are elicited. We interpret the results using the theory of commitment borrowed from social psychology.
BASE
In this paper, we propose a behavioural approach to determine the extent to which the consumer/citizen distinction affects interpretations of monetary values. We perform a field experiment dealing with air pollution, where some (randomly selected) subjects are given the opportunity to behave politically by signing a petition for environmental protection prior to stating their private preferences in a standard contingent valuation exercise. We show that the petition has the potential to influence respondents' willingness to pay and that whether the effect is negative or positive depends on the degree of (dis)similarity between the petition and the scenario in which willingness to pay are elicited. We interpret the results using the theory of commitment borrowed from social psychology.
BASE
In this paper, we propose a behavioural approach to determine the extent to which the consumer/citizen distinction affects interpretations of monetary values. We perform a field experiment dealing with air pollution, where some (randomly selected) subjects are given the opportunity to behave politically by signing a petition for environmental protection prior to stating their private preferences in a standard contingent valuation exercise. We show that the petition has the potential to influence respondents' willingness to pay and that whether the effect is negative or positive depends on the degree of (dis)similarity between the petition and the scenario in which willingness to pay are elicited. We interpret the results using the theory of commitment borrowed from social psychology.
BASE
International audience ; This article offers a reflexive presentation of an interdisciplinary case study involving environmental sociology and marine biology. The creation of the Calanques National Park (April 2012), next to Marseille, the second largest city in France, has fuelled debate over the increasing impact of widespread leisure activities on the conservation of biodiversity. Given this, our research programme has developed visual interdisciplinary methods and critically analysed the notion of overuse. This paper presents a case study of Sormiou Bay, a natural anchorage site whose seabed is covered in a meadow of protected seagrass, Posidonia oceanica. Our research involved qualitative and quantitative field surveys and interval photography over a 19-month period, as well as the use of historical aerial photographs. Three main findings are presented here. First, our analysis reveals that a gap exists between actual and perceived levels of use, and this is exacerbated by a scale effect. Secondly, we point out the social and cultural factors, as well as the political context underpinning users' discourse regarding (over)use of the Calanques. Lastly, we underscore the gap between the environmental awareness of boaters, their actual behaviour and their impact on Posidonia oceanica meadows.
BASE
International audience ; This article offers a reflexive presentation of an interdisciplinary case study involving environmental sociology and marine biology. The creation of the Calanques National Park (April 2012), next to Marseille, the second largest city in France, has fuelled debate over the increasing impact of widespread leisure activities on the conservation of biodiversity. Given this, our research programme has developed visual interdisciplinary methods and critically analysed the notion of overuse. This paper presents a case study of Sormiou Bay, a natural anchorage site whose seabed is covered in a meadow of protected seagrass, Posidonia oceanica. Our research involved qualitative and quantitative field surveys and interval photography over a 19-month period, as well as the use of historical aerial photographs. Three main findings are presented here. First, our analysis reveals that a gap exists between actual and perceived levels of use, and this is exacerbated by a scale effect. Secondly, we point out the social and cultural factors, as well as the political context underpinning users' discourse regarding (over)use of the Calanques. Lastly, we underscore the gap between the environmental awareness of boaters, their actual behaviour and their impact on Posidonia oceanica meadows.
BASE
International audience ; This article offers a reflexive presentation of an interdisciplinary case study involving environmental sociology and marine biology. The creation of the Calanques National Park (April 2012), next to Marseille, the second largest city in France, has fuelled debate over the increasing impact of widespread leisure activities on the conservation of biodiversity. Given this, our research programme has developed visual interdisciplinary methods and critically analysed the notion of overuse. This paper presents a case study of Sormiou Bay, a natural anchorage site whose seabed is covered in a meadow of protected seagrass, Posidonia oceanica. Our research involved qualitative and quantitative field surveys and interval photography over a 19-month period, as well as the use of historical aerial photographs. Three main findings are presented here. First, our analysis reveals that a gap exists between actual and perceived levels of use, and this is exacerbated by a scale effect. Secondly, we point out the social and cultural factors, as well as the political context underpinning users' discourse regarding (over)use of the Calanques. Lastly, we underscore the gap between the environmental awareness of boaters, their actual behaviour and their impact on Posidonia oceanica meadows.
BASE
In: Revue d'économie politique, Band 117, Heft 5, S. 675-698
ISSN: 2105-2883
Evaluation monétaire d'un gain d'espérance de vie dû à une réduction de la pollution de l'air : les enseignements d'une évaluation contingente en France Ce papier présente les résultats d'une enquête d'évaluation contingente effectuée en France afin d'estimer les gains en termes d'espérance de vie de la réduction de la pollution de l'air. Le questionnaire utilisé a été développé par Krupnick at al. [2002] pour les Etats Unis. Il a été traduit et administré à 300 individus âgés de 40 à 75 ans. Le questionnaire original a été modifié. D'une part, une question ouverte a été ajoutée après chacune des trois séries d'offre. D'autre part, à la fin du questionnaire et après avoir rappelé au répondant les valeurs de consentement à payer exprimées, l'opportunité lui était donnée de modifier ces valeurs. Chaque questionnaire se termine par un ″debriefing″ écrit détaillé afin d'appréhender comment les personnes interrogées avaient interprété les questions posées. De plus, afin de tester la robustesse des réponses, cinq variantes du questionnaire initial ont été testées sur des échantillons composés d'environ 50 individus chacun. Ces variantes incluaient en particulier des scénarios où le bénéfice issus de la réduction de la pollution de l'air était exprimé en terme de gain d'espérance de vie. Il a alors été possible de tester la sensibilité des réponses recueillies aux offres proposées ou à la description retenue afin de présenter le ″bien″ à évaluer. Pour chaque scénario une ″valeur d'une année de vie″ (VOLY) a été estimée. Ces valeurs sont comprises entre 0.020 to 0.220 M€. Cette forte dispersion reflète la grande difficulté qu'ont les personnes interrogées à comprendre les concepts de variation de risque et à répondre à ces propositions en terme de consentement à payer.