Suchergebnisse

À partir de l'analyse approfondie de deux corpus d'images – quelques photographies de théâtre prises par le photographe tchécoslovaque Josef Koudelka, et une photographie-performance de l'artiste chinois Ai Weiwei – cet article propose d'envisager la photographie de théâtre non seulement comme la simple reproduction d'une œuvre d'art théâtral, mais aussi comme l'enregistrement d'un événement.

A comment on Charles Taylor's Sources of the Self: the Making of Modern Identity (see IRPS No. 50/89c01206), in which Taylor attempts to resolve the opposition between subjectivity & objectivity by arguing that both are intertwined in the realm of value. Taylor's approach is very narrow in its definition of what is worthy of devotion, for three reasons: the approach blurs the distinction between understanding what is good & having reasons for action, it fails to distinguish between universal moral evaluations & personal ethical evaluations, & the particular perception of value it endorses does not take into account the properties of different situations. It is recommended that Taylor give a fuller account of how to distinguish between reasoning what is moral in general & reasoning what is ethical for a particular individual. 42 References. M. Wagner

AbstractRomantic and sexual relationships are increasingly initiated using mobile dating applications rather than in face‐to‐face contexts. There is subsequently a need to understand socially competent and incompetent behaviors during this pre‐interaction relationship development stage. One‐on‐one in‐depth interviews were conducted with 22 emerging adults from Australia and Belgium. Data were analyzed inductively based on thematic analysis. Participants reported 11 superordinate social competencies represented by 85 competent and 67 incompetent behavioral norms that varied across four stages of online relationship formation (profile, matching, discovery, and evaluation stages). Findings provide a unique contribution to the literature as online social competence has yet to be conceptualized. Comparisons between online and face‐to‐face relational processes are also discussed.

Voting advice applications (VAAs) are interactive online tools designed to assist voters by improving the basis on which they decide how to vote. Current VAAs typically aim to do so by matching users' policy-preferences with the positions of parties or candidates. But this 'matching model' depends crucially on implicit, contestable presuppositions about the proper functioning of the electoral process and about the forms of competence required for good citizenship-presuppositions associated with the social choice conception of democracy. This paper aims to make those presuppositions explicit and to contrast them with two possible alternative perspectives on VAAs, associated with deliberative and agonistic conceptions of democracy and citizenship. [Copyright Elsevier Ltd.]

Many discussions of love and the family treat issues of justice as something alien. On this view, concerns about whether one's family is internally just are in tension with the modes of interaction that are characteristic of loving families. In this essay, we challenge this widespread view. We argue that once justice becomes a shared family concern, its pursuit is compatible with loving familial relations. We examine four arguments for the thesis that a concern with justice is not at home within a loving family, and we explain why these arguments fail. We develop and defend an alternative conception of the justice‐oriented loving family, arguing that justice can—and, for the sake of justice, should—be seen as a family value.