Suchergebnisse

International audience ; Background: Improved survival after a cardiovascular event has led to an expanding patient population at very high risk of recurrent events. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and thus implicitly non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to guideline-recommended goals is a key tenet of secondary prevention. Yet, standard-of-care treatment with statin (with or without ezetimibe) often leaves a high risk of preventable cardiovascular events. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), highly efficacious lipid-lowering treatments that confer reduction in cardiovascular events and death, clearly have a role in the personalized management of these very-high-risk patients. Given budget constraints, however, their integration into the health care pathway merits health economic considerations. Consequently, it is important to identify challenges at the crossroads of the clinical and economic dimensions.Findings and conclusion: Health economic analyses involve application of modeling scenarios integrating multiple parameters to ultimately yield values for quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratios. To date, these analyses have led to widely variable estimates of these benchmarks for PCSK9 inhibitors, causing confusion among stakeholders in the health care pathway. Clearly, a consensual approach to the conduct and reporting of health economic analyses involving all players, including noneconomists such as clinicians and patient advocates, is essential to bridge the gap between the clinical needs of patients and financial access to PCSK9 inhibition.

International audience ; Background: Improved survival after a cardiovascular event has led to an expanding patient population at very high risk of recurrent events. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and thus implicitly non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to guideline-recommended goals is a key tenet of secondary prevention. Yet, standard-of-care treatment with statin (with or without ezetimibe) often leaves a high risk of preventable cardiovascular events. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), highly efficacious lipid-lowering treatments that confer reduction in cardiovascular events and death, clearly have a role in the personalized management of these very-high-risk patients. Given budget constraints, however, their integration into the health care pathway merits health economic considerations. Consequently, it is important to identify challenges at the crossroads of the clinical and economic dimensions.Findings and conclusion: Health economic analyses involve application of modeling scenarios integrating multiple parameters to ultimately yield values for quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratios. To date, these analyses have led to widely variable estimates of these benchmarks for PCSK9 inhibitors, causing confusion among stakeholders in the health care pathway. Clearly, a consensual approach to the conduct and reporting of health economic analyses involving all players, including noneconomists such as clinicians and patient advocates, is essential to bridge the gap between the clinical needs of patients and financial access to PCSK9 inhibition.

International audience ; Background: Improved survival after a cardiovascular event has led to an expanding patient population at very high risk of recurrent events. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and thus implicitly non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to guideline-recommended goals is a key tenet of secondary prevention. Yet, standard-of-care treatment with statin (with or without ezetimibe) often leaves a high risk of preventable cardiovascular events. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), highly efficacious lipid-lowering treatments that confer reduction in cardiovascular events and death, clearly have a role in the personalized management of these very-high-risk patients. Given budget constraints, however, their integration into the health care pathway merits health economic considerations. Consequently, it is important to identify challenges at the crossroads of the clinical and economic dimensions.Findings and conclusion: Health economic analyses involve application of modeling scenarios integrating multiple parameters to ultimately yield values for quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratios. To date, these analyses have led to widely variable estimates of these benchmarks for PCSK9 inhibitors, causing confusion among stakeholders in the health care pathway. Clearly, a consensual approach to the conduct and reporting of health economic analyses involving all players, including noneconomists such as clinicians and patient advocates, is essential to bridge the gap between the clinical needs of patients and financial access to PCSK9 inhibition.

This Perspective describes (a) the current situation, (b) challenges and initiatives, (c) and formulates recommendations to valorize and create access to innovative medicines in the EU. We are currently still far away from optimal assessment of value for money in the EU. On the one hand, valorizing innovative medicines involves a local appraisal by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and competent authorities about the value for money, the budget impact, and the local medical need that can be filled with new medicines. Therefore, local priorities and national health care policy environments should be reflected in the processes and criteria used for assessing value for money and ultimately for reimbursement decisions. On the other hand, a pan-European assessment of both relative effectiveness and medical need (including general ethical and social considerations) should be envisaged in order to feed part of the data needed for the local decisions in an efficient way. This could be the task of the European Medicines Agency, HTA bodies, and competent authorities together.

Many developed countries are reforming healthcare payment systems in order to limit costs and improve clinical outcomes. Knowledge on how different groups of professional stakeholders trade off the merits and downsides of healthcare payment systems is limited. Using a discrete choice experiment we asked a sample of physicians, policy makers, healthcare executives and researchers from Canada, Europe, Oceania, and the United States to choose between profiles of hypothetical outcomes on eleven healthcare performance objectives which may arise from a healthcare payment system reform. We used a Bayesian D-optimal design with partial profiles, which enables studying a large number of attributes, i.e. the eleven performance objectives, in the experiment. Our findings suggest that (a) moving from current payment systems to a value-based system is supported by physicians, despite an income trade-off, if effectiveness and long term cost containment improve. (b) Physicians would gain in terms of overall objective fulfillment in Eastern Europe and the US, but not in Canada, Oceania and Western Europe. Finally, (c) such payment reform more closely aligns the overall fulfillment of objectives between stakeholders such as physicians versus healthcare executives. Although the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the potential selection effects of participants, it seems that the value driven nature of newly proposed and/or introduced care payment reforms is more closely aligned with what stakeholders favor in some health systems, but not in others. Future studies, including the use of random samples, should examine the contextual factors that explain such differences in values and buy-in.

A brief comprehensive overview is provided of the elements constituting the burden of kidney disease [chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury]. This publication can be used for advocacy, emphasizing the importance and urgency of reducing this heavy and rapidly growing burden. Kidney diseases contribute to significant physical limitations, loss of quality of life, emotional and cognitive disorders, social isolation and premature death. CKD affects close to 100 million Europeans, with 300 million being at risk, and is projected to become the fifth cause of worldwide death by 2040. Kidney disease also imposes financial burdens, given the costs of accessing healthcare and inability to work. The extrapolated annual cost of all CKD is at least as high as that for cancer or diabetes. In addition, dialysis treatment of kidney diseases imposes environmental burdens by necessitating high energy and water consumption and producing plastic waste. Acute kidney injury is associated with further increases in global morbidity, mortality and economic burden. Yet investment in research for treatment of kidney disease lags behind that of other diseases. This publication is a call for European investment in research for kidney health. The innovations generated should mirror the successful European Union actions against cancer over the last 30 years. It is also a plea to nephrology professionals, patients and their families, caregivers and kidney health advocacy organizations to draw, during the Decade of the Kidney (2020–30), the attention of authorities to realize changes in understanding, research and treatment of kidney disease.

A brief comprehensive overview is provided of the elements constituting the burden of kidney disease [chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury]. This publication can be used for advocacy, emphasizing the importance and urgency of reducing this heavy and rapidly growing burden. Kidney diseases contribute to significant physical limitations, loss of quality of life, emotional and cognitive disorders, social isolation and premature death. CKD affects close to 100 million Europeans, with 300 million being at risk, and is projected to become the fifth cause of worldwide death by 2040. Kidney disease also imposes financial burdens, given the costs of accessing healthcare and inability to work. The extrapolated annual cost of all CKD is at least as high as that for cancer or diabetes. In addition, dialysis treatment of kidney diseases imposes environmental burdens by necessitating high energy and water consumption and producing plastic waste. Acute kidney injury is associated with further increases in global morbidity, mortality and economic burden. Yet investment in research for treatment of kidney disease lags behind that of other diseases. This publication is a call for European investment in research for kidney health. The innovations generated should mirror the successful European Union actions against cancer over the last 30 years. It is also a plea to nephrology professionals, patients and their families, caregivers and kidney health advocacy organizations to draw, during the Decade of the Kidney (2020-30), the attention of authorities to realize changes in understanding, research and treatment of kidney disease.

International audience ; AbstractRare diseases are an important public health issue with high unmet need. The introduction of the EU Regulation on orphan medicinal products (OMP) has been successful in stimulating investment in the research and development of OMPs. Despite this advancement, patients do not have universal access to these new medicines. There are many factors that affect OMP uptake, but one of the most important is the difficulty of making pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions in rare diseases. Until now, there has been little consensus on the most appropriate assessment criteria, perspective or appraisal process. This paper proposes nine principles to help improve the consistency of OMP P&R assessment in Europe and ensure that value assessment, pricing and funding processes reflect the specificities of rare diseases and contribute to both the sustainability of healthcare systems and the sustainability of innovation in this field. These recommendations are the output of the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL), a collaboration between rare disease experts, patient representatives, academics, health technology assessment (HTA) practitioners, politicians and industry representatives. ORPH-VAL reached its recommendations through careful consideration of existing OMP P&R literature and through a wide consultation with expert stakeholders, including payers, regulators and patients. The principles cover four areas: OMP decision criteria, OMP decision process, OMP sustainable funding systems and European co-ordination. This paper also presents a guide to the core elements of value relevant to OMPs that should be consistently considered in all OMP appraisals. The principles outlined in this paper may be helpful in drawing together an emerging consensus on this topic and identifying areas where consistency in payer approach could be achievable and beneficial. All stakeholders have an obligation to work together to ensure that the ...

International audience ; AbstractRare diseases are an important public health issue with high unmet need. The introduction of the EU Regulation on orphan medicinal products (OMP) has been successful in stimulating investment in the research and development of OMPs. Despite this advancement, patients do not have universal access to these new medicines. There are many factors that affect OMP uptake, but one of the most important is the difficulty of making pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions in rare diseases. Until now, there has been little consensus on the most appropriate assessment criteria, perspective or appraisal process. This paper proposes nine principles to help improve the consistency of OMP P&R assessment in Europe and ensure that value assessment, pricing and funding processes reflect the specificities of rare diseases and contribute to both the sustainability of healthcare systems and the sustainability of innovation in this field. These recommendations are the output of the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL), a collaboration between rare disease experts, patient representatives, academics, health technology assessment (HTA) practitioners, politicians and industry representatives. ORPH-VAL reached its recommendations through careful consideration of existing OMP P&R literature and through a wide consultation with expert stakeholders, including payers, regulators and patients. The principles cover four areas: OMP decision criteria, OMP decision process, OMP sustainable funding systems and European co-ordination. This paper also presents a guide to the core elements of value relevant to OMPs that should be consistently considered in all OMP appraisals. The principles outlined in this paper may be helpful in drawing together an emerging consensus on this topic and identifying areas where consistency in payer approach could be achievable and beneficial. All stakeholders have an obligation to work together to ensure that the ...

International audience ; AbstractRare diseases are an important public health issue with high unmet need. The introduction of the EU Regulation on orphan medicinal products (OMP) has been successful in stimulating investment in the research and development of OMPs. Despite this advancement, patients do not have universal access to these new medicines. There are many factors that affect OMP uptake, but one of the most important is the difficulty of making pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions in rare diseases. Until now, there has been little consensus on the most appropriate assessment criteria, perspective or appraisal process. This paper proposes nine principles to help improve the consistency of OMP P&R assessment in Europe and ensure that value assessment, pricing and funding processes reflect the specificities of rare diseases and contribute to both the sustainability of healthcare systems and the sustainability of innovation in this field. These recommendations are the output of the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL), a collaboration between rare disease experts, patient representatives, academics, health technology assessment (HTA) practitioners, politicians and industry representatives. ORPH-VAL reached its recommendations through careful consideration of existing OMP P&R literature and through a wide consultation with expert stakeholders, including payers, regulators and patients. The principles cover four areas: OMP decision criteria, OMP decision process, OMP sustainable funding systems and European co-ordination. This paper also presents a guide to the core elements of value relevant to OMPs that should be consistently considered in all OMP appraisals. The principles outlined in this paper may be helpful in drawing together an emerging consensus on this topic and identifying areas where consistency in payer approach could be achievable and beneficial. All stakeholders have an obligation to work together to ensure that the ...