Suchergebnisse

ThemeThe International Court of Justice has issued an Order regarding provisional measures requested by South Africa against Israel for the possible violation of its obligations in accordance with the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. SummaryThe International Court of Justice has confirmed, by an overwhelming majority of its judges, that it is plausible […]
La entrada Prospects and implications of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling in the case of South Africa against Israel se publicó primero en Elcano Royal Institute.

I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND – II. GIBRALTARAND DECOLONIZATION: THE UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTIONS – III. HISPANO-BRITISHNEGOTIATIONS IN 1966: RUPTURE AND CONFRONTATION – IV. DEMOCRATIC SPAIN: FROM THE 1980 LISBON TO THE 1984 BRUSSELS AGREEMENT – V. FROM THE MATUTES PROPOSAL (1997) TO THE UNSUCESSFULL NEGOTIATIONS OF 2001-2002 – VI. A NEW CONSTITUTION FORGIBRALTARAND ATRIPARTITE FORUM FOR NEGOTIATION – VII. LEGAL CONCLUSIONS – VIII. LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE – IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY.

According to the autor, the ECJ has made a mistake by accepting its jurisdiction with regard to patents, that is, in a area where there is no European legislation. The Court has also wrongly interpreted the TRIPS Agreement 1994. ; D'après l'auteur, la CJUE a comis l'erreur d'accepter sa jurisdiction en matière de brevets, autrement dit, dans un domaine où il n'y a pas de législation européenne. Elle a aussi eu tort d'interpréter l'Accord ADPIC de 1994.

El artículo no presenta resumen.