Suchergebnisse

The legal protection of Indonesian capital market investors is still very weak because they are unable to recover losses suffered due to violations of capital market laws and regulations by irresponsible persons. Although the government, both through laws and through the OJK with its regulations, has tried to accommodate investors' financial losses, in fact there is still a regulatory vacuum that is unable to cover losses due to violations that occur. In addition, the procedures that must be followed by investors as victims tend to make it difficult for investors in various aspects and do not even guarantee the certainty that investors can obtain compensation for their lost funds. Things like this encourage the government to innovate in optimizing investor legal protection until OJK adopts the United States' disgorgement concept to be applied in Indonesia by institutionalizing it into PKTS and DKKI supported by POJK Number 65/POJK.04/2020. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. From the research conducted, it is found that PKTS and DKKI are appropriate and relevant steps taken by OJK to achieve corrective justice for both investors and violators. However, the implementation of disgorgement in Indonesia is still not able to provide optimal protection so that it needs to be reviewed, especially with regard to the principles and mechanisms of its implementation.

In terms of disputes resolution, there are various alternative forms of dispute resolution outside the court. One form of dispute resolution that is often used is Mediation. Mediation is the embodiment of deliberation for consensus in dispute resolution. In the mediation process, dispute resolution begins with the good faith of both parties in resolving the dispute amicably. This can be realized because mediation prioritizes the approval of both parties without any coercion from the mediator. The Supreme Court has issued Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts as legal basis on conducting mediation in Courts. However, mediation not only can be carried by the Court, but mediation can also be carried out by the community outside the Court on various disputes faced by the community. Village officials, RT/RW, Lurah, and other respected person in the community can act as mediators in resolving disputes in the community. The research method used in this research is Empirical. The study was conducted to see the efectivity of mediation in resolving community disputes, especially in the Maleber and Andir sub-districts. The results of the study show that consensus deliberation mediation can resolve problems/disputes faced by the community without having to go through the litigation process. Local government officials such as Lurah, Camat, and local officials have played a major role in resolving disputes in the community.

Cultivation in coastal area usually did for business activity purpose against the villagers without giving concern for the nature & ecosystem impact. Coastal area have high level of potential conflict either marine aspect nor land authorization. Misuse & violation against coastal area indicate by construction frequently founded along shoreline. Restricted ban against shoreline is a prohibition that require villagers to not build a construction long 100 meters from shoreline. The law against shoreline intend to protect the villagers from tsunami and environmental damage thru human behavior. South Lampung District have high potential level of tsunami by reason the location is close to Krakatau Mountain. In advance of Tsunami 2018 which rushed Banten & South Lampung District throw a big disadvantage and had public nor government attention. In fact, there are a lot of construction who violate shoreline regulation. This research using empiric method which elaborate with direct observation. Faced by the low government supervision reveal the low level of villagers legal awareness about obligations and social function of the land as well as urgency of the preservation of environmental functions on the coast. Masyarakat wilayah pesisir kerap menggunakan pesisir untuk melakukan kegiatan usaha tanpa memikirkan dampak terhadap lingkungan & ekosistem. Wilayah pesisir rentan menjadi sumber konflik baik dari segi kelautan maupun penguasaan atas tanah wilayah pesisir. Penyalahgunaan & pelanggaran terhadap wilayah pesisir ditandai dengan kerap ditemukan bangunan yang berdiri di sepanjang pesisir yang melanggar ketentuan Garis Sempadan Pantai (GSP). Larangan mendirikan bangunan di sepanjang garis sempadan pantai adalah larangan terhadap masyarakat untuk tidak mendirikan bangunan di sepanjang 100 meter dari garis pantai. Peraturan mengenai Garis Sempadan Pantai sejatinya bertujuan untuk melindungi masyarakat dari bahaya tsunami dan kerusakan lingkungan yang ditimbulkan oleh ulah manusia. Wilayah Kabupaten Lampung Selatan merupakan wilayah yang rentan akan bahaya tsunami dikarenakan lokasinya yang berdekatan dengan Gunung Krakatau. Pada Tsunami 2018 silam, wilayah Kabupaten Lampung Selatan merupakan salah satu wilayah yang terdampak bencana Tsunami Selat Sunda. Diketahui banyak ditemukan bangunan yang rusak akibat peristiwa Tsunami 2018 silam pada wilayah Lampung & Banten. Kerugian yang ditimbulkan oleh tsunami 2018 silam telah menarik perhatian publik & pemerintah. Fakta menunjukan bahwa banyaknya bangunan yang berdiri melanggar ketentuan GSP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian empiris melakukan pengumpulan data pustaka, observasi dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian terdapat kurangnya pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah yang menyebabkan adanya kesadaran hukum yang kurang memadai dari masyarakat wilayah pesisir.