Innehållsförteckning -- Förord -- K-O Arnstberg: Inledning -- Ingrid Björkman: Varför en sådan oförsonlig hätskhet? -- Julia Caesar: "Vi gjorde bara vårt jobb" -- Jan Sjunnesson: Evigt tacksam -- Marika Formgren: Exkommunicering -- Mats Dagerlind: Där flintskalliga har lockar -- Kajsa Ekholm Friedman: De ville att jag skulle avskedas -- Jonathan Friedman: Utanför åsiktskorridoren -- Gunnar Sandelin: Sverige – en resa mot stupet -- Anna Hagwall: Petad ur laget -- Jan Milld: En resa utan att man flyttar på sig -- Ingrid Carlqvist: Journalisternas hat mot en avfälling -- Karl-Olov Arnstberg: Sveket -- Författarpresentation
Karl-Olov Arnstberg in the text Swedish Patriotism discusses the issue of identity and national consciousness in Sweden. The starting point for his reflections is the interview he had the opportunity to conduct with a doctor from Sri Lanka. He approached him as if he was a Swede, they both had a similar worldview, but his approach changed when the subject of conversation became the history of Sri Lanka. Arnstberg felt as if his interlocutor was so rooted in the past that the past, not the present created who he is now. The author of the text notices a parallel linking this situation with how the national consciousness of the Swedes was described at the beginning of the previous century by Selma Lagerlöf and Verner von Heidenstam. However, he notices certain regularity that "when the history of Sweden is written in a scientific and objective way, with a keen pursuit of truth, it is not only the history of Sweden that loses its social grounding, but it is also much harder to build a national identity on it". What affects most the nation are fantastic heroes and fantastic events. Arnstberg emphasizes that he does not need his country's history to build his identity. He refers to Peter Englund, a member of the Swedish Academy, who on the one hand wrote that ignorance of history may cause a lack of sense and identity, and on the other hand, he believed that historical events and heroes should not be used as justification for nationalism. His interpretation of Englund's words includes two approaches to history. The first – modernist, which does not look at history in the identity context, and the second – nationalist, according to which knowledge of history is important for a sense of community with the rest of the nation. Further, the author of the text analyzes the concept of Swedishness, referring to the articles of other researchers. The examples he gives more blur the term than allow us to understand what it really means. He demonstrates, on the basis of nationalism, the paradoxes of Swedishness and even undermines its existence.
