International regulation of internal resources: a study of law and policy
In: Virginia legal studies
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Virginia legal studies
World Affairs Online
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 106, Heft 2, S. 410-415
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 106, S. 226-228
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law, Band 106, Heft 2, S. 410-415
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 104, S. 195-196
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 100, Heft 3, S. 733-742
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 100, Heft 1, S. 164-179
ISSN: 2161-7953
On March 8, 2005, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a declaration on human cloning (the Declaration) by a recorded vote of 84 to 34, with 37 abstentions.1 The Declaration culminated an effort that had commenced in 2001 with a proposal by France and Germany for a convention against reproductive cloning of human beings. The three-and-ahalf- year negotiation that followed was intense and emotionally charged with religious and cultural overtones; at times, participants seemed to feel hopelessly mired. The Declaration that was ultimately adopted was often referred to as a "political declaration," apparently as a way of emphasizing the degree of compromise reflected in the text, and also as away of minimizing its normative value. The negotiation, which had originally been understood as limited to the narrow bioethics issue of prohibiting the making of cloned babies, led to profound discussions on human rights, cultural and religious diversities, and their interaction and priorities in case of conflict. Ultimately, neither the Declaration nor its negotiating history answered these difficult questions. But they provided a glimpse of the difficulties and impasses international lawmaking will confront when negotiations lose a secular tone.
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 100, S. 361-362
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law, Band 100, Heft 1, S. 164-179
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 93, Heft 1, S. 22-43
ISSN: 2161-7953
The United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (ICC) took place in Rome at the headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organization from June 15 to July 17, 1998. The participants numbered 160 states, thirty-three intergovernmental organizations and a coalition of 236 nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The conference concluded by adopting the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court by a nonrecorded vote of 120 in favor, 7 against and 21 abstentions. The United States elected to indicate publicly that it had voted against the statute. France, the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation supported the statute.
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 93, S. 65-68
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law, Band 93, Heft 1, S. 22-42
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 92, Heft 3, S. 590-593
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 83, S. 225-229
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 82, S. 205-209
ISSN: 2169-1118