Search results

Background: In 2009, the Russian legislation established the institution of bringing to subsidiary responsibility the head of the debtor, as well as other persons controlling the debtor for causing harm to the debtor who is unable to satisfy all creditors' claims. To correctly interpret and apply the norms of law, the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 53 was adopted in 2017. Despite this, not all gaps related to bringing the debtor's controlling persons to justice have been resolved. Objective: The authors aim to identify the problems of legal regulation of bringing to subsidiary responsibility of persons controlling the debtor in the event of bankruptcy of the debtor. Methods: the disclosure of the topic was carried out from the standpoint of general scientific methods (systemic, structural-functional, historical), the method of theoretical analysis, private scientific methods (comparative jurisprudence, technical and legal analysis, concretization, interpretation). The methodological basis of the study was the method of the theory of knowledge. Results: The problem of the subjectivity of assessments in court is revealed and solutions are proposed. The conditions for bringing persons to subsidiary liability of persons controlling the debtor are determined.

The objective of the article was to analyze the actions as an object of civil law regulation. The market contributes to the accumulation of capital and its transformation into investment resources for the financing of the productive and social spheres, which improves the general well-being of the population. Meanwhile, the legal nature of the shares has not yet been clearly defined in Russian law and there is, consequently, a dichotomy in the choice of ways to protect the owners of securities, including shares. For the development of the research, methods such as synthesis, theoretical analysis, abstraction, deduction, induction, classification, comparative law, refutation were used. Based on the legal acts that regulate the stock market, a comprehensive study of the problems of legal regulation of the rotation of shares is carried out, to determine the prospects for development and ways to improve the legal regulation of shares, as well as to look for ways to protect the rights of securities holders. Among the most significant results, the legal nature of the action was revealed, the meaning of categories such as: document, security and action was cleared, and the definition of action was formulated.

The objective of the article was to determine the essence and legal implementation in Russia of principles such as: independence of the judiciary, relative truth, contradictory nature, legal certainty of judicial acts and discretion. In the countries of the Roman-Germanic legal order, it is no coincidence that legal principles are of great scientific and applied importance. The presence of a certain system of procedural principles makes it possible to assess the existence of justice in the country, the stability of a judicial decision and the fairness of judicial acts. Thus, the principles of the law directly affect the level of legality in each state. Currently, some procedural principles give rise to a discussion in Russian doctrine about their essence and content. The topic is presented from the point of view of general scientific methods (systems analysis, structural and functional, historical), the method of theoretical analysis, specific scientific methods (comparative jurisprudence, technical and legal analysis, concretization, interpretation). The theoretical basis was cognitive theory. It is concluded that the principle of the independence of the judiciary is not fully operational in the Russian Federation.