Suchergebnisse

The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze and describe the application of the principles of good governance in the service of e-ID card Samarinda District Office Ilir and know the supporting factors and obstacles in the implementation of Good Governance in the Public service in the District Office Samarinda Ilir. This research included qualitative descriptive research. Descriptive research is to gain a clearer picture of the phenomena that occur in relation to the problems examined. The research instrument is a researcher himself, and once served as a data collector. Researcher as research instrument aims to obtain valid data and reliable. It may be filled due to direct researchers to the field observation and interviews with informants. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of the model Interactive (Interactive Model of Analysis), which includes activities Condensation, data presentation and conclusion (verification). The results showed that the application of Good Governance in the service E-KTP on Samarinda Ilir District Office is to increase accountability and transparency of the double meaning of the law suppressor space to increase effectiveness and efficiency in service delivery. As for the factor that inhibit the persistence of the district of devices that have not been trained in the use of computer so that the public service is sometimes hampered and discipline officers or their local government in providing public services. While the factors that support good governance (good governance) in addition to the commitment of government embodied in public policy decisions is also the insistence of public.Tujuan dari Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalis serta menggambarkan penerapan prinsip-prinsip Good Governance dalam pelayanan e-ktp Kantor Kecamatan Samarinda Ilirdan mengetahui faktor pendukung dan penghambat dalam Penerapan Good Governance Dalam pelayanan Publik di Kantor Kecamatan Samarinda Ilir Kota Samarinda. Penelitian yang dilakukan ini termasuk jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian deskriptif adalah untuk mendapatkan gambaran yang lebih jelas tentang fenomena-fenomena yang terjadi dalam kaitannya dengan masalah yang diteliti. Instrumen penelitian adalah peneliti sendiri, dan sekaligus berperan sebagai alat pengumpul data. Peneliti sebagai instrument penelitian bertujuan untuk mendapatkan data yang valid dan realible. Hal ini mungkin dapat dipenuhi karena peneliti langsung ke lapangan melakukan pengamatan dan wawancara dengan informan. Adapun Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis model Interaktif (Interaktive Model Of Analisis), yang meliputi kegiatan Kondensasi data, penyajian data dan penyimpulan (verifikasi). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Good Governance dalam pelayanan e_ktp pada Kantor Kecamatan Samarinda Ilir adalah dengan peningkatan akuntabilitas, transparansi dalam rangkap arti sipasi dalam rangka penekan hukum untuk peningkatan efektivitas dan efisiensi dalam pelayanan. Adapunfaktor yang menghambat masih adanya perangkat Kecamatan yang belum terampil dalam menggunakan computer sehingga pelayanan masyarakat kadang terhambat serta disiplinnya aparat atau petugas kecamatan dalam memberikan pelayanan umum. Sedangkan faktor yang mendukung tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) disamping adanya komitmen dari pemerintah yang diwujudkan dalam keputusan kebijakan publik juga adanya desakan dari masyarakatluas.

The article takes to task the well‐established anthropological claim that non‐Western peoples are free from the traps of dualistic thinking. Although Vezo informants in Madagascar produce statements that could be used to support such a claim, experimental procedures that target their inferential reasoning reveal that they systematically differentiate between mind and body, between the biological processes that determine the organism and the social processes that shape personhood. This suggests that there is a significant discrepancy between people's explicit linguistic statements and their implicit theoretical knowledge. Moreover, developmental data show that such implicit theoretical presuppositions are essential to the production and transmission of cultural knowledge. Thus, Vezo children, who do not as yet differentiate between the biological mechanism of birth and the social mechanism of nurture, are still unable to grasp a salient aspect of Vezo culture, namely the causally integrated set of ideas that guide the way adults classify the social world. These findings have significant theoretical and methodological implications for the constitution of anthropological knowledge.

We discuss the practice of property ascription in anthropology. While recognizing that it is an inevitable and often useful way to convey the knowledge that anthropologists have acquired through ethnographic fieldwork, we identify three of the most common ways in which ascription can be misleading. First, when a property is ascribed to a collective entity, but it is unevenly distributed among social sub‐groupings; second, when an ascribed mental property is alleged to cause an individual's behaviour, but the property proves to be empirically unsupported; third, when a belief is ascribed to an individual, while another belief that effectively contradicts the first one is also entertained by that same individual. We review anthropological and psychological solutions to these problems.RésuméLes auteurs discutent de la pratique d'attribution de propriétés en anthropologie. Tout en reconnaissant qu'il s'agit d'un moyen inévitable, et souvent utile, de transmettre les connaissances que les anthropologues ont acquises sur le terrain, ils identifient trois des manières les plus courantes dont cette attribution peut induire en erreur : premièrement, lorsqu'une propriété attribuée à l'identité collective est répartie inégalement parmi les sous‐groupes sociaux ; deuxièmement, lorsqu'on affirme qu'une propriété mentale attribuée est la cause du comportement d'un individu, mais que cette propriété s'avère dépourvue de fondement empirique ; troisièmement, lorsqu'une croyance est attribuée à un individu alors que ce même individu entretient une autre croyance, qui contredit de facto la première. Les auteurs examinent les solutions anthropologiques et psychologiques à ces problèmes.

The genealogical model has a long-standing history in Western thought. The contributors to this volume consider the ways in which assumptions about the genealogical model—in particular, ideas concerning sequence, essence, and transmission—structure other modes of practice and knowledge-making in domains well beyond what is normally labeled "kinship." The detailed ethnographic work and analysis included in this text explores how these assumptions have been built into our understandings of race, personhood, ethnicity, property relations, and the relationship between human beings and non-human species. The authors explore the influences of the genealogical model of kinship in wider social theory and examine anthropology's ability to provide a unique framework capable of bridging the "social" and "natural" sciences. In doing so, this volume brings fresh new perspectives to bear on contemporary theories concerning biotechnology and its effect upon social life