The system of limiting periodicals for second level regional heads of office in Aceh province contains norms that limit a maximum of two terms. Therefore a legal political review is needed by aligning existing regulations with the development of state administration. The purpose of this research is to analyze in the perspective of legal politics related to the limitation of the term of office and to determine the das sollen that is in line with current legal developments. The result of the research is that the norm which limits the two terms of office was born due to the consequences of the old order government where previously the term of office was not limited. The option of limiting the term of office of the second-level regional head currently being implemented is inappropriate because the limitation does not accommodate constituent and territorial binding elements.Keywords: limitation, periods, regional head position, Aceh
impeachment is an extraordinary effort contained in the presidential government system with respect to the process of impeating the head of government from the power it possesses. Indonesia as a country that adopts a presidential government system governs the issue of impeachment of heads of government based on the constitution of the state of the UUD 1945 in Article 7A, which regulates the acts and an incompetence which, when done or happened to the head of government can lead to a means to drop the head government from his power. The impeachment mechanism is regulated in Article 7B of the UUD 1945 which requires a political decision in the MPR with the consent of 2/3 of the number of MPR members present at the plenary session after obtaining a legal decision from the MK. The problem of this research is whether the MPR's political decisions are a requirement in the impeachment mechanism of the head of government in the presidential system of Indonesia in accordance with the principle of rule of law. The result of this research is that the requirement of MPR's political approval in Article 7B of the UUD 1945 is contradictory to the principle of rule of law adopted by Indonesia and can potentially annul the Constitutional Court decision which is final and binding, and can be a gap in maintaining the power of the head of government if the head of government has a majority vote in the MPR. It is recommended to immediately amend the UUD 1945 by removing the terms of political approval of the MPR contained in Article 7B paragraph (7) of the UUD 1945 Indonesia and giving the final decision to the Constitutional Court as the key in the process of impeachment of the head of government.Keywords : Impeachment, Presidential system Indonesia.
With regard to the principle of popular sovereignty embraced by Indonesia, there is an obligation that must be done by the president as head of government to be accountable for all policies or actions related to his position to the people as the holder of the highest sovereignty, after the amendment to the constitution of the state, there is a change in the mechanism of responsibility of the president . The problem of this research is whether the similarities and material related to the mechanism of responsibility of the president before and after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. The result of this research is that there are equations that are both doing political accountability to the people's representative institution based on the supervisory function through the right of inquiry. In contrast, there are differences in the mechanism of accountability in which before the amendment put forward the political accountability of the implementation of the GBHN, whereas after the amendment more to the legal accountability as regulated in the 1945 Constitution after the amendment. It is recommended that there be a certain regulation and mechanism related to the presidential political responsibility, so that the mechanism can assess the performance of the President against the implementation of RPJM, which has been done by the president only in the form of speech on the basis of the existing constitutional convention.Keywords : Comparison, Responsibility of the President.
In the section weighing Qanun Aceh Number 11 of 2018 on Islamic Financial Institutions (LKS) states that the juridical reason of the establishment of Qanun LKS is a follow-up to the implementation of Article 21 Qanun Aceh Number 8 of 2014 on the Principals of Islamic Shari'ah. After the promulging of Qanun LKS, many Conventional Bank Financial Institutions in Aceh decided to close their business in Aceh, so that if people still want to use conventional bank services, then the transaction must be done outside Aceh. In fact, almost all business actors in Aceh's economic activities are connected to outside areas, while in outside areas many business actors, especially corporations, have not fully used the Shari'ah banking system. The formulation of the problems discussed in this study is: "Is the legal politics promulgated Qanun Aceh Number 11 of 2018 on Islamic Financial Institutions has been able to improve the economy in Aceh?". The research method used in this research is normative-empirical research on the implementation of normative law provisions (laws) in action on any particular legal event that occurs in a society with a Live Case Study approach, which is an approach to a legal event whose process is still ongoing or has not ended. The results showed that in practice Aceh's economic independence is still very low, in the case of business actors, many obstacles are experienced in the services of Islamic banks, including difficulty making transactions with partners from outside Aceh who generally use conventional bank accounts. The advice given in this study is that conventional financial institutions that have been established in Aceh in facilitating the transactions of business people in Aceh and to succeed financial institutions based on islamic sharia principles only need to open Sharia business units from their conventional financial institutions that have been formed, this is in accordance with the mandate of Article 21 Qanun Aceh Number 8 of 2014 on The Principals of Islamic Shari'ah which is the basis or juridical reason of the establishment of Qanun LKS so that for business actors who transact with business actors outside Aceh who predominantly have not used shari'ah financial institutions can be facilitated in conducting business transactions, so that this will have an final impact on improving the economy in Aceh.
The existence of the Senate (DPD) can be summed up as a meeting between democratization and regional autonomy. The formation of the Senate (DPD) is of course to support regional interests in national policies to protect the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the formulation of problems described earlier regarding the participation of local political parties in national politics at DPD membership, the objectives of the study include examining the participation of local political parties to participate in national politics in DPD membership. Based on the research object above, this research is normative legal research (legal research). The position and function of the DPD are to bridge the local government to the central government in bringing the interests of the people in the regions. The existence of cadres of local political parties in the Senate (DPD) provides channels for the regions in the national decision-making process related to regional interests. Keyword: Senate, DPD, Political Parties
Politik uang (money politic) menjadi momok dan problem hukum tersendiri ketika konstelasi politik pemilu berlangsung terutama pemilu legislatif, dalam konteks ini pemilih tidak lagi melihat sosok calon legislatif yang pantas atau layak dipilih dengan pertimbangan aspek kompetensi dan kapasitas sebagai representasi rakyat di lembaga legislatif untuk lima tahun ke depan, namun lebih kepada berapa jumlah uang yang diberikan kepadanya. Pengaturan hukum terhadap pelarangan politik uang (money politic) diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu Pasal 523 ayat 1 dan 2. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Pasal 101 Badan Pengawas Pemilu diberikan kewenangan untuk melakukan pencegahan dan penindakan terkait dengan pelanggaran peraturan perundang-undangan Pemilu serta menyelesaikan sengketa proses Pemilu. Badan Pengawas Pemilu Kabupaten Aceh Barat belum melaksanakan tugas secara maksimal khusus dalam konteks penanggulangan pelanggaran politik uang (money politic) pada pemilu serentak 2019. Hal itu dapat dilihat dengan tidak adanya case yang ditanganinya. Penegakan supremasi hukum (law enforcement) salah satu cara penanggulangan tindak pidana termasuk masalah politik uang (money politic), karena pemidanaan pada prinsipnya bertujuan yaitu sebagai berikut: Sebagai sarana memberikan efek jera pada si pelaku; Memberikan pembelajaran pada orang lain agar tidak melakukan tindak pidana.
Human conflict with wildlife is a complex problem because it isn't only related to human safety but also with the safety of wildlife itself. Conflicts that have occurred have pushed the Government of Aceh, District/City Government and related parties to be more wise in understanding the lives of wild animals so that the handling and prevention measures can be optimized and based on the root of the problem. For this reason, a legal protection is needed in the form of a qanun which is expected to be able to integrate all available resources to protect wildlife in Aceh. The method of implementation in community service is to get involved with the expert team Commission II DPRA in drafting the Qanun of Wildlife Management until finally the qanun was ratified on 27 September 2019 and then promulgated to be Qanun on 29 October 2019. The participation of the authors in the drafting of the draft qanun of wildlife includes part of the process of forming the qanun, including starting from the stages of planning, drafting, and discussion. While the stages of ratification or stipulation, enactment and dissemination are carried out by the DPRA and the Government of Aceh itself in accordance with their respective duties, functions and authorities.
The enactment of Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh has provided a legal basis for Aceh Province to revitalize traditional life in Aceh Province. As an inseparable part of the Aceh Province, Gampong Lamie, Darul Makmur District, Nagan Raya Regency is certainly part of the legal area of the Aceh Qanun No. 9/2008. The implementation of community service activities is carried out by the method of delivering materials directly by displaying materials in the form of Aceh Qanun No. 9 of 2008. Customs settlement of cases in Aceh is recognized by several regional regulations and policies. Article 13 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 state that the settlement of 18 types of disputes/disputes between customs and traditions as referred to above is resolved in stages and law enforcement officers provide an opportunity for disputes/disputes to be resolved first. traditionally in the gampong (village) or other names. In addition, it is also stated in the Joint Decree of the Governor of Aceh, the Head of the Aceh Regional Police, and the Chair of the Aceh Customary Council Number: 189/677/2011, 1054/MAA/XII/2011, B/121/I/2012 concerning the Implementation of Gampong and Mukim Customary Courts. Other Names in Aceh.
