Suchergebnisse

ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS IN ADDRESSING THE PHENOMENON OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM IS THAT, DESPITE A PLETHORA OF SCHOLARLY WORK AND MORE THAN THIRTY YEARS OF INTER-GOVERNMENTAL DISCOURSE, THERE IS STILL NO COMMONLY ACCEPTED DEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM. EXISTING DEFINITIONS TEND TO FALL INTO TWO BROAD CATEGORIES, ACADEMIC AND POLITICAL. CONTEMPORARY ACADEMIC DEFINITIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM ARE PRIMARILY DESIGNED TO FIT INCIDENTS INTO VARIOUS STATISTICAL MODELS. THEY ARE OFTEN LENGTHY, OVER-COMPLICATED AND DEFY COMMON USAGE. GOVERNMENTAL DEFINITIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM TEND TO BE AMBIGUOUS TO ALLOW THE MOST POLITICALLY CONVENIENT INTERPRETATION OF EVENTS. THIS PAPER TAKES A PRAGMATIC LOOK AT THE ONGOING DEFINITIONAL DILEMMA IN THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM. DRAWING UPON BOTH SIDES OF THE DEFINITIONAL SPECTRUM, IT CHARTS A MIDDLE COURSE ARGUING FOR A MORE LUCID AND FUNCTIONAL DEFINITION OF TERRORISM BASED ON PRIMARY CHARACTERISTICS WHICH DISTINGUISH INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM FROM OTHER TYPES OF VIOLENCE.