Dispute Settlement in European Union Free Trade Agreements: Lessons Learned?
In: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, S. 383-406
3 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, S. 383-406
This paper is published simultaneously by the European University Institute as a School of Transnational Governance Report. ; The EU may not be a superpower but it holds a 'power surplus' when it comes to the trade-regulatory nexus. The strategic challenges posed by the deployment of this power surplus are the subject of this paper, which argues that in order to be a responsible regulatory power and positively influence the multilateral agenda, the EU needs to develop a coherent overall approach to the external dimension of its regulatory policies. In this spirit, and in most cases, the EU would be ill advised to project itself as a model or to seek to 'weaponise' its regulatory powers in pursuit of unrelated foreign policy goals. Instead, it should wield this power to enhance the regulatory compatibility between its own and others' jurisdictions through cooperation rather than relying on the passive market-based influence of the so-called Brussels effect. This is simply a way to be faithful to its core defining philosophy of legal empathy. The CEPS Policy Insight by authors Ignacio Garcia Bercero and Kalypso Nicolaides offers a typology of different forms of external EU regulatory impact, a discussion of the risks of either underuse or overuse of the regulatory power surplus, and considers the 'good global governance' model implied by a principled geopolitical role. It moves on to discuss a unifying conceptual framework to encompass this approach, under the umbrella of 'managed mutual recognition' as the operationalisation of legal empathy. It concludes with six specific suggestions as to how the EU can best exercise its regulatory power through a closer integration of trade and regulatory policies. ; Introduction -- Cooperation as residual: the global impact of EU regulatory policies -- The EU's regulatory power surplus: how should it be used? -- An integrated approach to managed mutual recognition: legal empathy and the regulatory compatibility paradigm -- Recommendations: globalising legal empathy -- Postscript
BASE
In: European foreign affairs review, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 149-165
ISSN: 1875-8223
This contribution seeks to make the case for a positive regulatory agenda between the European Union and the United States of America, drawing upon past experiences and lessons learnt, notably in the context of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations. The authors are of the opinion that despite differences in regulatory systems, both the EU and the US have an interest in avoiding fragmented regulatory solutions for similar societal challenges. EUUS regulatory cooperation should be supportive of international efforts geared towards the development of regulations and standards based on a high level of protection. In working together, both sides may be able to achieve better outcomes for their citizens and businesses, while maintaining – if not improving – levels of protection. Such cooperation should be developed in a transparent and accountable manner and fully respect the preferences reflected in US and EU domestic legislation.