Political issues in biotechnology: setting the framework
In: Journal of social and biological structures: studies in human sociobiology, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 417-422
ISSN: 0140-1750
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of social and biological structures: studies in human sociobiology, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 417-422
ISSN: 0140-1750
In: Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum
ISSN: 1424-4020
In: Journal of social and biological structures: studies in human sociobiology, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 99-103
ISSN: 0140-1750
In: Journal of social and biological structures: studies in human sociobiology, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 97-99
ISSN: 0140-1750
In: Journal of social and biological structures: studies in human sociobiology, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 97-99
ISSN: 0140-1750
In: CESifo economic studies: a joint initiative of the University of Munich's Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 49-74
ISSN: 1612-7501
In: Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum
ISSN: 1424-4020
In: Policy studies review: PSR, Band 8, Heft Winter 90
ISSN: 0278-4416
This symposium provides an overview of the policy issues created by the emergence of a broad assortment of biomedical technologies. (JLN)
In: Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum, Band 8, Heft 18
ISSN: 1424-4020
Data Availability Statement: The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s. Supplementary Material: The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809455/full#supplementary-material ; Aim: The neurocognitive basis of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD; or motor clumsiness) remains an issue of continued debate. This combined systematic review and meta-analysis provides a synthesis of recent experimental studies on the motor control, cognitive, and neural underpinnings of DCD. Methods: The review included all published work conducted since September 2016 and up to April 2021. One-hundred papers with a DCD-Control comparison were included, with 1,374 effect sizes entered into a multi-level meta-analysis. Results: The most profound deficits were shown in: voluntary gaze control during movement; cognitive-motor integration; practice-/context-dependent motor learning; internal modeling; more variable movement kinematics/kinetics; larger safety margins when locomoting, and atypical neural structure and function across sensori-motor and prefrontal regions. Interpretation: Taken together, these results on DCD suggest fundamental deficits in visual-motor mapping and cognitive-motor integration, and abnormal maturation of motor networks, but also areas of pragmatic compensation for motor control deficits. Implications for current theory, future research, and evidence-based practice are discussed. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020185444. ; Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship; Research Centre scheme, Australian Catholic University; Czech Science Foundation (GACR EXPRO scheme: 21-15728X); Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2020.0200). ; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809455/full#supplementary-material
BASE