Theories of "post-Fordism": a critique
In: Economics and commerce discussion papers 24/90
37 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Economics and commerce discussion papers 24/90
In: Historical materialism: research in critical marxist theory, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 65-100
ISSN: 1569-206X
Australia, long seen as a remote outpost of the British Empire in the South Pacific and more recently as a loyal lieutenant of Washington, does not fit the traditional image of an imperialist country. Nonetheless, while it may not be one of the big three or four world powers, it is, I will argue, a mid-level imperialist that leverages its alliance with the United States to project power over its region. It has been and remains reliant on foreign capital, but it is also a wealthy independent centre of capital accumulation and military power with its own national interests and with an increasing financial footprint overseas.
In: Labour & industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 1-25
ISSN: 2325-5676
In: Labour history: a journal of labour and social history, Heft 79, S. 179
ISSN: 1839-3039
In: Labour & industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 372-398
ISSN: 2325-5676
In: International journal of human resource management, Band 29, Heft 5, S. 915-940
ISSN: 1466-4399
Labor governments since the early 20th Century have consistently attempted to boost business profits. The way they have done so has changed but their policies have been consistently shaped by both the shifting requirements of Australian capitalism and the ALP's nature as a capitalist workers party. From the 1940s until the early 1970s, Labor advocated a program of Keynesian and protectionist economics. As the economics profession turned against protectionism, the Whitlam Government sought to integrate Australian capitalism more closely with the global economy. The Hawke and Keating Governments went much further in opening the economy, deregulating, privatizing and corporatizing than their conservative predecessor. In most areas, with the notable exception of industrial relations, they generally acted in line with the new, neo-liberal orthodoxy in economics. The logic of the Rudd and Gillard Governments' responses to the global economic crisis, invoking a mixture of neo-liberal and Keynesian precepts, like the economic policies of its Labor predecessors, can only be grasped in terms of the ALP's distinctive material constitution.
BASE
Labor governments since the early 20th Century have consistently attempted to boost business profits. The way they have done so has changed but their policies have been consistently shaped by both the shifting requirements of Australian capitalism and the ALP's nature as a capitalist workers party. From the 1940s until the early 1970s, Labor advocated a program of Keynesian and protectionist economics. As the economics profession turned against protectionism, the Whitlam Government sought to integrate Australian capitalism more closely with the global economy. The Hawke and Keating Governments went much further in opening the economy, deregulating, privatizing and corporatizing than their conservative predecessor. In most areas, with the notable exception of industrial relations, they generally acted in line with the new, neo-liberal orthodoxy in economics. The logic of the Rudd and Gillard Governments' responses to the global economic crisis, invoking a mixture of neo-liberal and Keynesian precepts, like the economic policies of its Labor predecessors, can only be grasped in terms of the ALP's distinctive material constitution.
BASE
Recent characterisations of the Australian Labor Party as a 'cartel party' suggest that there was, after the 1970s, a fundamental discontinuity in Labor's history. We assess this contention not only in terms of the ALP's policies but also the mechanisms which link it with different classes and social groups: Labor's electoral support, membership and local branches, the backgrounds of the Party's parliamentarians and leaders, the role of trade unions inside the ALP, and its sources of funding. While there have been some quantitative changes in these characteristics, we conclude that Labor remains, on balance, a 'capitalist workers party.'
BASE
Recent characterisations of the Australian Labor Party as a 'cartel party' suggest that there was, after the 1970s, a fundamental discontinuity in Labor's history. We assess this contention not only in terms of the ALP's policies but also the mechanisms which link it with different classes and social groups: Labor's electoral support, membership and local branches, the backgrounds of the Party's parliamentarians and leaders, the role of trade unions inside the ALP, and its sources of funding. While there have been some quantitative changes in these characteristics, we conclude that Labor remains, on balance, a 'capitalist workers party.'
BASE
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 281-294
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 281-294
ISSN: 1363-030X
Recent characterisations of the Australian Labor Party as a 'cartel party' suggest that there was, after the 1970s, a fundamental discontinuity in Labor's history. We assess this contention not only in terms of the ALP's policies but also the mechanisms which link it with different classes and social groups: Labor's electoral support, membership and local branches, the backgrounds of the Party's parliamentarians and leaders, the role of trade unions inside the ALP, and its sources of funding. While there have been some quantitative changes in these characteristics, we conclude that Labor remains, on balance, a 'capitalist workers' party'.
BASE
In: Social movement studies: journal of social, cultural and political protest, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 105-121
ISSN: 1474-2837