The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
13 results
Sort by:
In: The Princeton-China series
What might a viable political alternative to liberal democracy look like? In Against Political Equality, Tongdong Bai offers a possibility inspired by Confucian ideas. Bai argues that domestic governance influenced by Confucianism can embrace the liberal aspects of democracy along with the democratic ideas of equal opportunities and governmental accountability to the people. But Confucianism would give more political decision-making power to those with the moral, practical, and intellectual capabilities of caring for the people. While most democratic thinkers still focus on strengthening equality to cure the ills of democracy, the proposed hybrid regime-made up of Confucian-inspired meritocratic characteristics combined with democratic elements and a quasi-liberal system of laws and rights-recognizes that egalitarian qualities sometimes conflict with good governance and the protection of liberties, and defends liberal aspects by restricting democratic ones. Bai applies his views to the international realm by supporting a hierarchical order based on how humane each state is toward its own and other peoples, and on the principle of international interventions whereby humane responsibilities override sovereignty. Exploring the deficiencies posed by many liberal democracies, Against Political Equality presents a novel Confucian-engendered alternative for solving today's political problems
In: World Political Theories
In: World Political Theories Ser.
China is a rising economic and political power. But what is the message of this rise? Tongdong Bai addresses this increasingly pressing question by examining the rich history of political theories and practices from China's past, and showing how it impacts upon the present. Part of Zed?s World Political Theories series, this ground-breaking work offers a remarkable insight into the political history and thought of a nation that is becoming increasingly powerful on the world stage
In: The review of politics, Volume 83, Issue 2, p. 282-286
ISSN: 1748-6858
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Volume 14, Issue 1, p. 132-158
ISSN: 1755-0491
AbstractIn the majority opinion by the U.S. Supreme Court over same-sex marriage, a claim by Confucius was quoted, which led to an uproar among Confucian scholars in mainland China. In this article, I will first explain the background of the debate over same-sex marriage in the United States, and why Confucius's claim was quoted. I will then show how a contemporary Confucian philosopher Zhang Xianglong addressed the issue of same-sex marriage from a Confucian perspective. In my view, compared with other mainland Confucians' responses, Zhang's are one of the most scholarly and moderate responses that nevertheless follow Confucian values. But he eventually rejected same-sex marriage on the Confucian ground. I will argue that, based on some Confucian values and principles which are shared by Zhang, we can answer Zhang's concerns with same-sex marriage, thus offering an even more moderate Confucian stance that accepts same-sex marriage. But this stance is still different from the typical liberal one. We will also see that, in order to accept same-sex marriage, it is the liberals, not the Confucians, who will have to deal with an issue—the acceptance of polygamy—that poses a serious challenge to the principle of equality, which is fundamental to some liberals.
In: China review international: a journal of reviews of scholarly literature in Chinese studies, Volume 23, Issue 4, p. 334-343
ISSN: 1527-9367
There are four problems with democracy, especially the institution of one person one vote. Many democratic and liberal thinkers understand them and try to correct them from within. But I will argue that these revisions are fundamentally inadequate to address these problems.A better political arrangement to deal with this fact than today's democracies is a hybrid regime that contains both democratic and meritocratic elements, which is what a Confucian would propose. I will illustrate the basic arrangements of this regime, and show why it can deal with the aforementioned fact and so why it is superior to today's democratic regimes.
BASE
In: New perspectives quarterly: NPQ, Volume 29, Issue 1, p. 12-39
ISSN: 1540-5842
For 500 years the West was on the rise, culminating in Globalizaiton 1.0—the open system of trade, information flows and the spread of technology on the terms and in the image of the West. The benefits of that system over the last 30 years have led to the rise of the emerging economies. As a result we are entering the new era of Globalization 2.0 characterized by new forms of non‐Western modernity and the interdependence of plural identities. The advent of this new era has been hastened by the fiscal and financial crisis in Europe and the United States.Turkey, with its Islamic‐oriented democracy that has become a template for the liberated peoples of the Arab Spring, and China, with its effective neo‐Confucian form of governance, are the most sharply defined new players in this multi‐polar and multi‐dimensional world.In this section, one of Turkey's most insightful sociologists examines the post‐secular transformation of that nation. One of China's more provocative philosophers proposes a hybrid model that combines what has been learned from the experience of Western and Chinese governance in a way that "enhances democracy" in both systems.
In: New perspectives quarterly: NPQ, Volume 29, Issue 1, p. 12-40
ISSN: 0893-7850
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Volume 175, Issue 1, p. 1-2
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: China review international: a journal of reviews of scholarly literature in Chinese studies, Volume 12, Issue 2, p. 501-509
ISSN: 1527-9367
In: The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Volume 175, Issue 1, p. 3-12
ISSN: 1573-0964