Meta-analysis addressing the potential of antibiotic resistance gene elimination through aerobic composting
In: Waste management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, Band 182, S. 197-206
ISSN: 1879-2456
3 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Waste management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, Band 182, S. 197-206
ISSN: 1879-2456
In: Guo , C , Bai , Z , Shi , X , Chen , X , Chadwick , D , Strokal , M , Zhang , F , Ma , L & Chen , X 2021 , ' Challenges and strategies for agricultural green development in the Yangtze River Basin ' , Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences , vol. 18 , no. 1 , pp. 37-54 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815x.2021.1883674
The Yangtze River Basin (YRB) has been recognized as one of the key strategic development regions in China. Agriculture p52 roduction systems in the YRB have contributed considerably to China's goal of food security. Realizing Agriculture Green Development (AGD) means agriculture production systems with high productivity, high resource use efficiency and low environmental costs. However, challenges and barriers still exist for realizing AGD in the YRB. Here, we summarize four main challenges for AGD in the YRB, and identify two approaches (top-down and bottom-up) including main strategies needed to achieve AGD. The four challenges include, but are not limited to, (1) low agricultural productivity and nutrient use efficiencies, (2) an uneven agricultural production structure, (3) rapid urbanization, and (4) uncoordinated targets for environmental protection and food production. We conclude that both top-down and bottom-up approaches are needed to deliver AGD in the YRB. Top-down approaches are mainly operated by government and underpinned by research, which uses spatial planning to promote the balance between agricultural production and the ecological environment, and to optimize the proportions of cereal and cash crop production with monogastric and ruminant animal production. The bottom-up approach needs strategies to close the yield gap of various cropping and livestock systems, improve resource use efficiencies to control environmental impacts. Furthermore, training and education are needed to increase awarenessand improve skills for farmers and advisers. Our review can serve as example for other global regions that are in transition from unsustainable agriculture production towards sustainable withclean environment and healthy economies
BASE
In: Bai , Z , Ma , W , Ma , L , Velthof , G L , Wei , Z , Havlík , P , Oenema , O , Lee , M R F & Zhang , F 2018 , ' China's livestock transition : Driving forces, impacts, and consequences ' , Science Advances , vol. 4 , no. 7 , eaar8534 . https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8534
China's livestock industry has experienced a vast transition during the last three decades, with profound effects on domestic and global food provision, resource use, nitrogen and phosphorus losses, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the driving forces around this transition and its national and global consequences. The number of livestock units (LUs) tripled in China in less than 30 years, mainly through the growth of landless industrial livestock production systems and the increase in monogastric livestock (from 62 to 74% of total LUs). Changes were fueled through increases in demand as well as, supply of new breeds, new technology, and government support. Production of animal source protein increased 4.9 times, nitrogen use efficiency at herd level tripled, and average feed use and GHG emissions per gram protein produced decreased by a factor of 2 between 1980 and 2010. In the same period, animal feed imports have increased 49 times, total ammonia and GHG emissions to the atmosphere doubled, and nitrogen losses to watercourses tripled. As a consequence, China's livestock transition has significant global impact. Forecasts for 2050, using the Shared Socio-economic Pathways scenarios, indicate major further changes in livestock production and impacts. On the basis of these possible trajectories, we suggest an alternative transition, which should be implemented by government, processing industries, consumers, and retailers. This new transition is targeted to increase production efficiency and environmental performance at system level, with coupling of crop-livestock production, whole chain manure management, and spatial planning as major components.
BASE