Kant and Sartre: existentialism and critical philosophy; Jonathan Head et. al -- Metaphysics -- (self-) consciousness and transcendental apperception; Sorin Baiasu -- Kant, Sartre and temporality; Daniel Herbert -- The quiet power of the imaginary; Thomas Flynn -- Kant and Sartre on freedom; Christian Onof -- Metaethics -- Sartre and Kant on reflection and freedom; Leslie Stevenson -- Action, value and autonomy: a quasi-Sartrean view; Peter Poellner -- Kantian radical evil and Sartrean bad faith; Justin Alam -- The pursuit of happiness; Michelle Darnell -- Metaphilosophy -- Sartre: transcendental philosopher or philosophical therapist?; Katherine Morris -- The transcendental idealisms of Kant and Sartre; Richard Aquila
This book challenges the view of the relationship between Kant's and Sartre's practical philosophies arguing that Kant was one of Sartre's most significant predecessors. The book identifies several fundamental theses of Sartre's practical philosophy, and shows Sartre to be closer to Kant in this respect than many contemporary Kantian theories are.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Durante décadas, los teóricos interesados en la discusión de Kant sobre el bienestar han estudiado la postura de Kant sobre la cuestión de la redistribución de bienes en la sociedad. Lo han hecho tanto para aclarar su postura como para una fuente de inspiración para problemas conceptuales actuales, frente a filósofos políticos contemporáneos que intentan reconciliar el ideal de la libertad igualitaria con la necesaria interferencia asimétrica para la redistribución y la provisión social. En este artículo, comienzo por la breve discusión kantiana sobre el estado del bienestar en la Doctrina del derecho e identifico cuatro premisas que Kant afirmó con claridad como características de su postura. Posteriormente, propongo las cinco vías interpretativas principales en la interpretación de la obra de Kant, las evalúo y las ordeno. La interpretación más acertada de la justificación kantiana del bienestar, que llamo la postura "genuinamente kantiana" no llega a explicar, sin embargo, la naturaleza del deber del bienestar que propone. Propongo una solución, retrotrayéndome en los textos kantianos, que unida a otras consideraciones y cuestiones, se puede entender como el punto de partida de una nueva vía de interpretar este tema. ; For several decades, theorists interested in Kant's discussion of welfare have puzzled over Kant's position on the issue of the redistribution of goods in society. They have done this both in order to clarify his position and as a source of inspiration for current conceptual problems faced by contemporary political philosophers who attempt to reconcile the ideal of equal freedom with the asymmetric interference necessary for redistribution and social provision. In this paper, I start with Kant's brief discussion of welfare in Rechtslehre and I identify four claims that Kant clearly asserts as characteristic for his view. I then outline five main interpretative directions in the literature, I evaluate and rank them. The most accurate view of Kant's justification of welfare, which I call the "genuinely Kantian" position is, however, unable to explain the nature of the duty of welfare that it asserts. By going back to Kant's text, I suggest one solution. This solution, together with some further questions, can be seen as initiating a new interpretative direction in the literature.
"The thought of Immanuel Kant is fundamental to understanding Western philosophy. Spanning epistemology, metaphysics, ethics and religion, the sheer scope and originality of Kant's ideas have decisively shaped the history of modern philosophy. The Kantian Mind is an outstanding guide and reference source to Kant's thought and a major new publication in Kant scholarship. Comprising 45 chapters by a stellar team of contributors, the collection is divided into four clear parts: Background to the Critical Philosophy Transcendental Philosophy (Critique and Doctrine) Posthumous Writings and Lectures Kant and Contemporary Kantians. In addition to coverage of Kant's main works, the volume contains chapters on a broad range of topics including Kant's views on logic, mathematics, the natural sciences, anthropology, religion, politics, and education. The concluding chapters cover the influence of Kant's thought on contemporary analytic and continental philosophy. Including suggestions for further reading at the end of each chapter The Kantian Mind is essential reading for all students and scholars of Kant and contemporary Kantian thought. It will also be extremely helpful to those in related Humanities and Social Sciences disciplines such as religion, history, politics, and literature"--
Cover -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction: Practical Justification in Kant -- 1. Kant's Rechtfertigung and the Epistemic Character of Practical Justification -- 2. Why Ought Implies Can -- 3. Kant on Practical Reason -- 4. Constructing Practical Justification: How Can the Categorical Imperative Justify Desire-based Actions? -- 5. Anthropology and Metaphysics in Kant's Categorical Imperative of Law: An Interpretation of Rechtslehre , B and C -- 6. Kant, Moral Obligation, and the Holy Will -- 7. Is Practical Justification in Kant Ultimately Dogmatic? -- 8. Constructivism and Self-constitution -- 9. Formal Approaches to Kant's Formula of Humanity -- 10. Kant's Grounding Project in The Doctrine of Virtue -- 11. Kant and Libertarianism -- 12. Kant's Practical Justification of Freedom -- 13. The Place of Kant's Theism in His Moral Philosophy -- 14. Freedom, Temporality, and Belief: A Reply to Hare -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- V -- W -- Z.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
The past three decades have witnessed the emergence of several Kantian theories. Both the critical reaction to consequentialism inspired by Rawlsian constructivism and the universalism of more recent theories informed by Habermasian discourse ethics trace their main sources of inspiration back to Kant's writings.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext: