Dinamizmus a közgazdasági "széleken": a heterodox közgazdaságtan újraéledése
In: Gazdaság és Társadalom, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 103-108
22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Gazdaság és Társadalom, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 103-108
In: Gazdaság és Társadalom, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 51-69
In: Gazdaság és Társadalom, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 156-170
In: Gazdaság és Társadalom, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 5-20
In: Magyarorság az ezredfordulón
In: I, Rendszerváltozás: piacgazdaság, társdalom, politika
In: Revue française d'administration publique, Band 74, Heft 1, S. 243-249
Setting-up of the Civil Service in Hungaria.
In the period previous to the change of regime in 1990, the Civil Service had shown some differences from the socialist model by giving more importance to professional qualifications and to individual aptitudes. In 1990, the change of the general orientation occured without compromising the quality of the administrative work, and the 1992 reform was made calmly. However, because Act XXIII of 1992 does not provide the whole Hungarian Civil Service whith a general framework, it is deceiving. It does not cover the development of the new system of initial and in-service training of civil servants. The particularism of the Civil Service at the local level is not enough taken into account. Finally, the absence of a general view of Civil Service management is problematic. To resolve these problems, it is necessary to consider a review of the Civil Service Act.
In: Revue française d'administration publique: publication trimestrielle, Heft 74, S. 243-250
ISSN: 0152-7401
In: Public administration: an international quarterly, Band 71, Heft 1-2, S. 75-88
ISSN: 0033-3298
In: Revue française d'administration publique, Band 61, Heft 1, S. 69-70
Hungary : Restructuring The Value System. We cannot speak of a modernization program in the case of Hungary because we are dealing with a new type of government. It is a permanent program because the establishment of new institutions implies a long process.
In: Studia politicae Universitatis Silesiensis, Band 34, S. 67-82
ISSN: 2353-9747
The Round Table Talks in Hungary and Poland were widely criticized by opposition forces not participating in the negotiations. One of them was the Hungarian October Party, which considered this form of transformation to have been flawed and against the interests of society. The formation, which also had Polish connections and was led by György Krassó, became known primarily through its street happenings. Its criticisms of the participants in the Round Table Talks bear a strong resemblance to the opinion of the so-called non-constructive Polish opposition forces.