The Tragedy of Realism: Morality, Power, and IR Theory
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 508-509
ISSN: 1468-2486
29 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 508-509
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 348-352
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 363-382
ISSN: 1468-2478
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 363-382
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 508-509
ISSN: 1521-9488
In: Global environmental politics, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 92-97
ISSN: 1536-0091
In: Global environmental politics, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 8-13
ISSN: 1536-0091
Scholars and activists are concerned, sometimes simultaneously, with mitigation of anthropogenic climate change and the environmental effects of globalization. Many analysts argue that a solution to both problems is localization; increasing the costs of transportation should increase the cost of long-distance transportation, making local and regional exchange economically relatively more efficient. The argument here, however, is that dealing with climate change will have the effect of reinforcing patterns of economic globalization, at the expense of patterns of economic nationalization and continentalization. Transportation by sea has historically been, and continues to be, more fuel-efficient than transportation by land. Limiting anthropogenic carbon emissions in transportation therefore favors sea transport over land transport. Historically, patterns of trade favored global seaborne trade routes over trade within land-based regions. The model to look in understanding the effect of action on climate change on global trade pattens, therefore, is not the future proposed by the localists, it is at historical patterns.
In: Global Environmental Politics, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 8-13
Scholars & activists are concerned, sometimes simultaneously, with mitigation of anthropogenic climate change & the environmental effects of globalization. Many analysts argue that a solution to both problems is localization; increasing the costs of transportation should increase the cost of long-distance transportation, making local & regional exchange economically relatively more efficient. The argument here, however, is that dealing with climate change will have the effect of reinforcing patterns of economic globalization, at the expense of patterns of economic nationalization & continentalization. Transportation by sea has historically been, & continues to be, more fuel-efficient than transportation by land. Limiting anthropogenic carbon emissions in transportation therefore favors sea transport over land transport. Historically, patterns of trade favored global seaborne trade routes over trade within land-based regions. The model to look in understanding the effect of action on climate change on global trade patterns, therefore, is not the future proposed by the localists, it is at historical patterns. 13 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Global Environmental Politics, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 92-97
In: Global Environmental Politics, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 92-97
A review essay on books by (1) Kevin P. Gallagher & Jacob Werksman (Eds), The Earthscan Reader on International Trade and Sustainable Development (London: Earthscan, 2002); (2) Carolyn L. Deere & Daniel C. Esty (Eds), Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lesson for Hemispheric Trade (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2002); & (3) Robert C. Paehlke, Democracy's Dilemma: Environment, Social Equity, and the Global Economy (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2003).
In: Global Environmental Politics, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 92-97
In: International studies review, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 325-342
ISSN: 1521-9488
World Affairs Online
In: Global Environmental Politics, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 92-97
In: Global Environmental Politics, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 8-13
In: International studies review, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 203-205
ISSN: 1521-9488