Predation by house cats, Felis catus (L.), in Canberra, Australia. II. Factors affecting the amount of prey caught and estimates of the impact on wildlife
In: Wildlife research, Band 25, Heft 5, S. 475
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
Information on the amount of vertebrate prey caught by house cats in Canberra
was collected by recording prey deposited at cat owners' residences over
12 months. The amount of prey taken was not significantly influenced by cat
gender, age when neutered, or cat breed. Nor did belling or the number of
meals provided per day have a significant influence on the amount of prey
caught. The age of the cat and the proportion of nights spent outside
explained approximately 11% of the variation in the amount of prey
caught by individual cats. In all, 43% of variation in predation on
introduced species (predominantly rodents) was explained by distance from
potential prey source areas (i.e. rural/grassland habitat) and cat
density. The mean number of prey reported per cat over 12 months (10.2) was
significantly lower than mean predation per cat per year based on estimates
made by cat owners before the prey survey began (23.3). Counts of the amount
of prey caught by house cats were highly positively skewed. In all, 70%
of cats were observed to catch less than 10 prey over 12 months, but for
6% of cats, more than 50 prey were recorded. Estimates of predation by
house cats, particularly extrapolated estimates, should be treated with
caution. The total number of prey caught by house cats in Canberra estimated
using the sample median was approximately half the estimate based on the
sample mean. Predation estimates alone do not prove that prey populations are
detrimentally affected, especially in highly disturbed and modified
environments such as suburbs. Impacts on native fauna are likely to be most
significant in undisturbed habitat adjacent to new residential developments.