Search results

The Forces that Push and Pull -- Bachelors, Bureaucrats, and Marrying Into the Nation -- Wives, Wages, and Regulating Breadwinners -- Mothers, Welfare Organizations, and Reproducing for the Nation -- Neighborhood, Street Culture, and Melting-Pot Mixité -- Motherhood, Neighborhood, and Nationhood -- Neighborly Networks and Welfare Work Under Vichy.

Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1. The Forces that Push and Pull -- 2. Bachelors, Bureaucrats, and Marrying into the Nation -- 3. Wives, Wages, and Regulating Breadwinners -- 4. Mothers, Welfare Organizations, and Reproducing for the Nation -- 5. Neighborhood, Street Culture, and Melting-Pot Mixité -- 6. Motherhood, Neighborhood, and Nationhood -- 7. Neighborly Networks and Welfare Work under Vichy -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index

AbstractThrough a blend of personal narrative and a survey of recent historical scholarship on gender, race and reproduction, this article asks readers to consider how our own proximity to power, privilege and oppression shapes the ways we approach the study of history. It argues that age‐old disciplinary dogmas exist for a reason and they can unintentionally limit our imaginations. It also suggests how those of us for whom the academy was never intended can help push those scholarly boundaries and perhaps even breathe new life into a disappearing discipline.

"Over fifty years agosociologist T.H. Marshall first opened the modern debate about the evolution of full citizenship in modern nation-states, arguing that it proceeded in three stages: from civil rights, to political rights, and finally to social rights. The shortcomings of this model were clear to feminist scholars. As political theorist Carol Pateman argued, the modern social contract undergirding nation-states was from the start premised on an implicit "sexual contract." According to Pateman, the birth of modern democracy necessarily resulted in the political erasure of women. Since the 1990sfeminist historians have realized that Marshall's typology failed to describeadequately developments that affected women in France. An examination of the role of women and gender in welfare-state development suggested that social rights rooted in republican notions of womanhood came early and fast for women in France even while political and economic rights would continue to lag behind. While their considerable access to social citizenship privileges shaped their prospects, the absence of women's formal rights still dominates the conversation. Practiced Citizenship offers a significant re-reading of that narrative. Through an analysis of how citizenship was lived, practiced, and deployed by women in France in the modern period, Practiced Citizenship demonstrates how gender normativity and the resulting constraints placed on women nevertheless created opportunities for a renegotiation of the social and sexual contract"--

"Over fifty years agosociologist T.H. Marshall first opened the modern debate about the evolution of full citizenship in modern nation-states, arguing that it proceeded in three stages: from civil rights, to political rights, and finally to social rights. The shortcomings of this model were clear to feminist scholars. As political theorist Carol Pateman argued, the modern social contract undergirding nation-states was from the start premised on an implicit "sexual contract." According to Pateman, the birth of modern democracy necessarily resulted in the political erasure of women. Since the 1990sfeminist historians have realized that Marshall's typology failed to describeadequately developments that affected women in France. An examination of the role of women and gender in welfare-state development suggested that social rights rooted in republican notions of womanhood came early and fast for women in France even while political and economic rights would continue to lag behind. While their considerable access to social citizenship privileges shaped their prospects, the absence of women's formal rights still dominates the conversation. Practiced Citizenship offers a significant re-reading of that narrative. Through an analysis of how citizenship was lived, practiced, and deployed by women in France in the modern period, Practiced Citizenship demonstrates how gender normativity and the resulting constraints placed on women nevertheless created opportunities for a renegotiation of the social and sexual contract"--