Suchergebnisse

This presentation used the concept of intersectionality as central to research on why poor and working class Women of Color and Single mothers tend to remain in lower socioeconomic situations based on the cultural and politically imposed time-binds of balancing family life and work commitments. Capitalism and systemic racism, often referred to as the 'tools of the patriarchy' are two mobility-prohibitive ways to retain a male dominated political system and economically subordinate WOC. This is especially because they do not have as much agency in the political process - intersectional underrepresentation at work. My presentation focused on how time-binds further stratify the equity gap between WOC of working classes and professional women with more inherited opportunities and political platforms within the socioeconomic contexts of the United States.

AbstractBackgroundCaregivers often avoid involving people with intellectual disability in end‐of‐life discussions and activities. One reason is fear that the person may become upset or psychologically harmed.MethodsPre and post a 6‐month intervention about end of life, we assessed depression, anxiety, and fear of death among intervention (n = 24) and comparison (n = 20) participants with intellectual disability. End‐of‐life 'encounters' (conversations/activities about end of life) were monitored, including comfort ratings.ResultsOverall, 79% of encounters were rated very comfortable/somewhat comfortable. Participants initiated 69% of encounters. There was no significant pre–post change in depression or fear of death. Anxiety improved significantly.ConclusionsThis is the first controlled, longitudinal study providing robust evidence about whether discussing end of life leads to emotional discomfort or psychological harm. Data showed adults with intellectual disability can safely engage in conversations/activities about end of life. The high percentage of participant‐initiated encounters showed participants wanted to talk about end of life.

AbstractWorldwide health and social outcomes of Indigenous people are poorer than those of non‐Indigenous. In Australia, the Indigenous population experience disability at more than twice the rate of the non‐Indigenous population, and a quarter live in geographically remote areas. The challenges associated with accessing services and supports in remote communities can impact on a good life for Aboriginal people with disability. Interviews were conducted with Aboriginal people (Anangu) with disability and family carers from remote Central Australian communities and service workers. Thematic data analysis determined factors Anangu viewed as essential to living a good life: connection to their Lands, being with family and engaging in cultural activities. Workers' support for a good life involves "Proper Way" help and an understanding of Anangu culture. Three culturally relevant strengths‐based concepts are important in supporting Anangu with disability to live a good life: being connected to the Lands and family, sharing together and working together.