Rammohun Roy and Debendranath Tagore : between Advaita critique and devotional theism -- Rajnarayan Basu : between religious intuition and ecstatic Vaiṣṇavism -- Bijoy Krishna Goswami : between Caitanya Vaiṣṇavism and Brahmo universalism -- Sitanath Tattvabhushan and Bipin Chandra Pal : between Hegelian universalism and Vaiṣṇava devotionalism -- Sivanath Sastri and Pratap Chandra Mozoomdar : between the social gospel and Brahmo devotionalism -- Bankim Chandra Chatterjee : between Brahmo rationalities and Vaiṣṇava affectivities -- Competing visions of Hindu universalism.
In: Shofar: a quarterly interdisciplinary journal of Jewish studies ; official journal of the Midwest and Western Jewish Studies Associations, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 141-143
Both Samkhya-Yoga and Advaita Vedanta grapple with a conceptual tension which informs their understandings of spiritual practice--that while embodied selves seek liberation from the structures of worldly suffering, they are essentially the immutable reality which is never subject to any empirical ills. Though the metaphysical visions of these systems sharply diverge, Advaitins such as Samkara were able to appropriate from Samkhya-Yoga certain practices geared toward the yogic purification of the mind while rejecting its ontological scheme outlining a dualism between purusa and prakrti. By highlighting the complex relationship between Samkhya-Yoga and Samkara, we examine how it was creatively re-imagined by Ramana Maharshi who developed certain distinctive pedagogical styles centred around the liberating value of silence.
Jon Paul Sydnor, Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2011. 226 pp. $45. ISBN 978-1608993086 (paperback)
This article is an investigation into whether it is possible to trace certain parallels between the conception of the divine reality as 'gracious' from within the contextualized vocabularies of both Christian thought and some forms of South Indian Vaisnavite devotional belief and practice. We explore the nature of a certain dialectic that appears in the thought of St Augustine, namely, between God's prevenient grace and God's justice: on the one hand, if grace is offered to human beings on the basis of their prior merits, it is not an unmerited gift that is freely and unconditionally given by God, but, on the other, if God does not graciously approach all human beings, the divine salvific will seems to be 'arbitrary', at least from a human perspective. Some Vaisnavite theologians have grappled with a similar dialectic in conceptualizing the relation between Brahman who 'graciously' elects the devotee and Brahman who is the 'just' supervisor of the karmic order of retributions and rewards: on the one hand, if Brahman is under the sway of the law of moral causation, Brahman is not supreme over the world, but, on the other, if Brahman liberates only a few individual selves without regard to operation of the karmic principle, Brahman is partial to them.
