The principles of territorial integrity & (non)interference halt the influence of self-determination. Legal relationship between these principles become much more complex in the Balkans despite the strong regard given to preserving the territorial integrity of the state. One of the repercussion of this controversial relationship is that human right stay without effectual protection in the case of conflict between these two principles. In this circumstance central government & movement to self-determination are supported to settle its claims by restoring to armed hostilities. The author explains how international community can reduce the inherent conflict as the working out of these principles in light of the forces of democratization & respect for human rights, peace & development comes to make the parties see them as less & less irreconcilable. References. Adapted from the source document.
At the very beginning of the 21st century, humanity has undergone great chang-es and has faced great challenges. These changes and challenges are visible on technological, economic, environmental, and political platforms. Humankind today has more power than it has ever had, and feels more insecure than ever before. This discrepancy between the feeling of power and the feeling of insecurity spurs a "new culture of the global power structure" which is increasingly seeking its new philosophical and cultural authenticity, ideological and political transparency, and a new strategy for the survival of humanity. The multilateral competition of neoliberal capitalism is no longer able to open wider perspectives for the devel-opment of a new global digital economy. Neoliberal capitalism is no longer able to respond effectively to the global political chaos that is increasingly visible and aggressive on the hori-zon of authoritarian populist rhetoric that threatens to grow into the mainstream of global social changes. By creating control networks through high-speed Internet connections with centralised crisis management centres, so-called "smart grids" are created, which include control of sets of high technologies and energy sources (the energy Internet (EI)), Internet of things (IoT), "Smart cities", articulating a programme of "a new key of technological de-velopment", a new concept of "public policy", which requires a new concept of "responsible and progressive capitalism", which articulates the vision of humankind in the 21st century. ; All'inizio del ventunesimo secolo, l'umanità ha subito grandi cambiamenti e affrontato grosse sfide, che sono visibili a livello tecnologico, economico, ambientale e politico. Oggi l'umanità ha più potere che mai, ma non si è mai sentita così insicura. La discrepanza fra le sensazioni di potere e di insicurezza promuove una "nuova cultura della struttura del potere globale" che è sempre più alla ricerca di una sua autenticità filosofica e culturale, di una trasparenza ideologica e politica, e di una nuova strategia per la sopravvivenza dell'u-manità. La competizione multilaterale che caratterizza il capitalismo neoliberale non è più in grado di aprire prospettive più ampie per lo sviluppo di una nuova economia globale digitale. Il capitalismo neoliberale non è più in grado di trovare risposte adeguate al caos politico globale sempre più visibile e aggressivo sull'orizzonte della retorica autoritaria populista che minaccia di entrare a far parte dei normali cambiamenti sociali globali. Attraverso la creazione di reti di controllo grazie a collegamenti internet ad alta velocità con centri cen-tralizzati di gestione di crisi, si creano le cosiddette "reti intelligenti", che comprendono il controllo di sistemi di tecnologie avanzate e fonti d'energia (internet dell'energia), l'internet delle cose (IoT), "città intelligenti", l'articolazione di un programma di "una chiave nuova di sviluppo tecnologico", un nuovo concetto di "politiche pubbliche" che richiede un nuovo concetto di "capitalismo responsabile e progressista" e che articola la visione dell'umanità nel ventunesimo secolo.
The principles of territorial integrity and (non)interference halt the influence of self-determination. Legal relationship between these principles become much more complex in the Balkans despite the strong regard given to preserving the territorial integrity of the state. One of the repercussion of this controversial relationship is that human right stay without effectual protection in the case of conflict between these two principles. In this circumstance central government and movement to self-determination are supported to settle its claims by restoring to armed hostilities. The author explains how international community can reduce the inherent conflict as the working out of these principles in light of the forces of democratisation and respect for human rights, peace and development comes to make the parties see them as less and less irreconcilable.
The author analysis the growth of global terrorism and activities of terrorist groups in contemporary world. Focusing on the ethnic and religious background of many terrorist groups, global terrorism, author argues, claims to be a powerful partner in new global conflict, gradually growing into national movements which could be supported by large ethnic, religious or racial communities across the world. Terrorist groups took its driving power and encouragement from the ideas and goals of the main group which principally lies in social injustice or economic inequalities of marginalized large social groups. Their links with ethnic, religious or social background pose the greatest potential threat to states with unstable economies, political turmoil, religious-ethnic hatred and with large-scale immigrants.
