Suchergebnisse

Résumé Le « travailleur pauvre » en emploi, tel un funambule évolue sur le fil du travail précaire. Pourquoi résiste-t-il alors qu'il pourrait baisser les bras et vivre des minima sociaux et des aides connexes ? Toujours travailleur, il en est fier, mais aussi pauvre, il en a honte. Son double statut lui fait redouter une situation bien plus grave : celle de devenir inutile et assisté aux yeux de la société qui lui renverra sa non-conformité. Pour conserver sa dignité, il s'accroche à son emploi même s'il doit trouver des stratégies... du début à la fin du mois. Situation périlleuse, dignité précieuse... tel est le vécu du « travailleur pauvre » en emploi, qui mène un combat pour maintenir sa place sociale. Cet article aborde la question des « travailleurs pauvres » en emploi, de leur dignité et de leur place dans la société.

The Ontario Medical Association (OMA) guidelines for intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction were released in March 1988 and contributed to a government decision against special per-case funding to assist hospitals using tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). In October 1988, 1512 cardiologists, internists and physician-administrators who were OMA members were mailed a questionnaire seeking their views on the OMA guidelines and related issues. Of the 419 questionnaires (28%) that were returned, 392 contained usable responses. Among the respondents 268 (68%) had used thrombolytic drugs in the preceding 12 months; the mean number of cases was 10.6 (standard deviation 12.9). A strong or a mild preference for tPA over streptokinase was registered by 64% of the respondents; 28% had no preference. However, the self-reported ratio of actual streptokinase:tPA use was about 3:1, and 73% indicated that the government's funding policy had limited the availability of tPA in their hospital. The respondents were almost equally divided as to whether the policy should be changed. The guidelines were deemed helpful by 85% of the noncardiologists, as opposed to 52% of the cardiologists (p less than 0.005). OMA involvement in developing and circulating such guidelines was supported by 74% of the respondents and opposed by 18%; opposition was more likely to come from those who found the guidelines unhelpful (p less than 0.001). Support for involvement by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario was much weaker (supported by 32%, opposed by 62%). Overwhelming opposition to government involvement was evident.

The organizing committee of a workshop on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) surveyed invited organizations on their attitudes and activities related to five topics to be covered during the workshop sessions: organizational roles, priority setting, guidelines implementation, guidelines evaluation and development of a network of those active in the CPG field. Organizational roles: The national specialty societies were felt to have the largest role to play; the smallest roles were assigned to consumers, who were seen to have a role mainly in priority setting, and to industry and government, both of which were seen to have primarily a funding role. Many barriers to collaboration were identified, the solutions to all of which appeared to be better communication, establishment of common principles and clear role definitions. Priority setting: There was considerable agreement on the criteria that should be used to set priorities for CPG activities: the burden of disease on population health, the state of scientific knowledge, the cost of treatment and the economic burden of disease on society were seen as important factors, whereas the costs of guidelines development and practitioner interest in guidelines development were seen as less important. Organizations were unable to give much information on how they set priorities. Guidelines implementation: Most of the organizations surveyed did not actively try to ensure the implementation of guidelines, although a considerable minority devoted resources to implementation. The 38% of organizations that implemented guidelines actively listed a wide variety of activities, including training, use of local opinion leaders, information technology, local consensus processes and counter detailing. Guidelines evaluation: Formal evaluation of guidelines was undertaken by fewer than 13% of the responding organizations. All the evaluations incorporated assessments before and after guideline implementation, and some used primary patient data. Barriers to evaluation included lack of ...