In: BAUER, PAUL C. (2021) "Clearing the Jungle: Conceptualising Trust and Trustworthiness." In "Trust matters: cross-disciplinary essays." edited by Barradas de Freitas, Raquel, and Sergio Lo Iacono.
In: Bauer, P. C. (2018). Unemployment, Trust in Government, and Satisfaction with Democracy: An Empirical Investigation. Socius. Doi.org/10.1177/2378023117750533
In: Paul C. Bauer (2014). Negative Experiences and Trust: A Causal Analysis of the Effects of Victimization on Generalized Trust European Sociological Review, doi:10.1093/esr/jcu096
In: Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal. doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002
AbstractThis study investigates the relationship between direct democracy and political trust. We suggest a solution to the controversy in research centering on positive versus negative effects of direct democracy by analytically differentiating between the availability of direct democratic rights and the actual use of those rights. Theoretically, greater availability of direct democratic rights may enhance political trust by increasing citizens' perception that political authorities can be controlled as well as by incentivizing political authorities to act trustworthily. In contrast, the actual use of the corresponding direct democratic instruments may initiate distrust as it signals to citizens that political authorities do not act in the public's interest. We test both hypotheses for the very first time with sub‐national data of Switzerland. The empirical results seem to support our theoretical arguments.
Little is known about political polarization in German public opinion. This article offers an issue-based perspective and explores trends of opinion polarization in Germany. Public opinion polarization is conceptualized and measured as alignment of attitudes. Data from the German General Social Survey (1980 to 2010) comprise attitudes towards manifold issues, which are classified into several dimensions. This study estimates multilevel models that reveal general and issue- as well as dimension-specific levels and trends in attitude alignment for both the whole German population and sub-groups. It finds that public opinion polarization has decreased over the last three decades in Germany. In particular, highly educated and more politically interested people have become less polarized over time. However, polarization seems to have increased in attitudes regarding gender issues. These findings provide interesting contrasts to existing research on the American public.
In: Bauer, P. C. and Fatke, M. (2014), Direct Democracy and Political Trust: Enhancing Trust, Initiating Distrust–or Both?. Swiss Political Science Review, 20: 49–69. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12071
In: Simon Munzert and Paul C. Bauer . Political Depolarization in German Public Opinion, Volume Political Science Research and Methods, Issue 1, p. 67-89 doi:101017/psrm20137
AbstractWhile a large body of literature empirically documents an electoral advantage for local candidates, the exact mechanisms accounting for this effect remain less clear. We integrate theories on the political geography of candidate-voter relations with socio-psychological accounts of citizens' local attachment, arguing that citizens vote for candidates from their own local communities as an expression of their place-based identity. To test our argument, we exploit a unique feature of the German mixed-member electoral system. We identify the causal effect of candidates' localness by relying on within-electoral-district variation coupled with a geo-matching strategy on the level of municipalities ($$\hbox {N}=11175$$
N = 11175
). The results show that voters exhibit a strong bias in favor of local candidates even when they are not competitive. More than only expecting particularistic benefits from representatives, citizens appear to vote for candidates from their own local community to express their place-based social identity.