Twenty-two percent of adults in the United States have only basic health literacy skills. We used a multiple linear regression model to identify associations between readability of informed consent documents with study sponsor, study phase, and approval year using a sample of 143 oncology studies at Ochsner Medical Center. The M ± SD Flesh-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (RGL) was 10.33 ± 0.85 and Flesh Reading Ease (FRE) was 52.89 ± 5.49. National Cancer Institute studies had a significantly lower mean RGL and FRE as compared with other sponsors (RGL 9.85 ± 0.66 vs. 10.72 ± 0.79; p value < .0001). Mean RGL did not differ by study phase. Future research should include assessment and improvement of the readability of informed consent documents.
There is no standard policy regarding the regulatory or institutional approval of N-of-1 trials in the United States. The objective of this study was to examine whether institutional review boards (IRBs) accredited by the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP) consider N-of-1 trials as meeting the definition of human subjects research (45CFR46.102) and requiring IRB approval. A questionnaire was distributed via email to 170 AAHRPP-accredited IRBs in the United States. Responses were analyzed using statistical and qualitative methods. Nineteen of 59 respondents reported viewing N-of-1 trials as research. Twelve respondents reported having a policy regarding N-of-1 trials, and in all cases, such policies did not consider N-of-1 trials as meeting the definition of research. This topic deserves wider examination in the IRB literature and community to inform policies and guidance as N-of-1 trials become more common in the pursuit of personalized, precision medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the genetic burden of type 2 diabetes modifies the association between the quality of dietary fat and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Individual participant data meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Eligible prospective cohort studies were systematically sourced from studies published between January 1970 and February 2017 through electronic searches in major medical databases (Medline, Embase, and Scopus) and discussion with investigators. REVIEW METHODS: Data from cohort studies or multicohort consortia with available genome-wide genetic data and information about the quality of dietary fat and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in participants of European descent was sought. Prospective cohorts that had accrued five or more years of follow-up were included. The type 2 diabetes genetic risk profile was characterized by a 68-variant polygenic risk score weighted by published effect sizes. Diet was recorded by using validated cohort-specific dietary assessment tools. Outcome measures were summary adjusted hazard ratios of incident type 2 diabetes for polygenic risk score, isocaloric replacement of carbohydrate (refined starch and sugars) with types of fat, and the interaction of types of fat with polygenic risk score. RESULTS: Of 102 305 participants from 15 prospective cohort studies, 20 015 type 2 diabetes cases were documented after a median follow-up of 12 years (interquartile range 9.4-14.2). The hazard ratio of type 2 diabetes per increment of 10 risk alleles in the polygenic risk score was 1.64 (95% confidence interval 1.54 to 1.75, I2=7.1%, τ2=0.003). The increase of polyunsaturated fat and total omega 6 polyunsaturated fat intake in place of carbohydrate was associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, with hazard ratios of 0.90 (0.82 to 0.98, I2=18.0%, τ2=0.006; per 5% of energy) and 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00, I2=58.8%, τ2=0.001; per increment of 1 g/d), respectively. Increasing monounsaturated fat in place of carbohydrate was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.19, I2=25.9%, τ2=0.006; per 5% of energy). Evidence of small study effects was detected for the overall association of polyunsaturated fat with the risk of type 2 diabetes, but not for the omega 6 polyunsaturated fat and monounsaturated fat associations. Significant interactions between dietary fat and polygenic risk score on the risk of type 2 diabetes (P>0.05 for interaction) were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that genetic burden and the quality of dietary fat are each associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes. The findings do not support tailoring recommendations on the quality of dietary fat to individual type 2 diabetes genetic risk profiles for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes, and suggest that dietary fat is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes across the spectrum of type 2 diabetes genetic risk. ; The EPIC-InterAct study received funding from the European Union (Integrated Project LSHM-CT-2006-037197 in the Framework Programme 6 of the European Community). We thank all EPIC participants and staff for their contribution to the study. We thank Nicola Kerrison (MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK) for managing the data for the InterAct Project. In addition, InterAct investigators acknowledge funding from the following agencies: MT: Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health; the CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Murcia Regional Government (N° 6236); JS: JS was supported by a Heisenberg-Professorship (SP716/2-1), a Clinical Research Group (KFO218/1) and a research group (Molecular Nutrition to JS) of the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF); YTvdS, JWJB, PHP, IS: Verification of diabetes cases was additionally funded by NL Agency grant IGE05012 and an Incentive Grant from the Board of the UMC Utrecht; HBBdM: Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands); MDCL: Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health; Murcia Regional Government (N° 6236); FLC: Cancer Research UK; PD: Wellcome Trust; LG: Swedish Research Council; GH: The county of Västerbotten; RK: Deutsche Krebshilfe; TJK: Cancer Research UK; KK: Medical Research Council UK, Cancer Research UK; AK: Medical Research Council (Cambridge Lipidomics Biomarker Research Initiative); CN: Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health; Murcia Regional Government (N° 6236); KO: Danish Cancer Society; OP: Faculty of Health Science, 47 University of Aarhus, Denmark; JRQ: Asturias Regional Government; LRS: Asturias Regional Government; AT: Danish Cancer Society; RT: AIRE-ONLUS Ragusa, AVIS-Ragusa, Sicilian Regional Government; DLvdA, WMMV: Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands); MMC: Wellcome Trust (083270/Z/07/Z), MRC (G0601261).
