Suchergebnisse

Einführung: Der Gnippeninteraktionsprozeß als zentraler Gegenstand der Kleingnippenforschung -- Einführung: Der Gnippeninteraktionsprozeß als zentraler Gegenstand der Kleingnippenforschung -- I: Theoretische Konzepte und Forschungsbefunde -- 1. Soziale Interaktion — konzeptueller Rahmen -- 2. Muster sozialer Interaktion in Gruppen — Forschungsstand -- II: Methoden der Interaktionsprozeßdiagnostik -- 3. Methoden der Datenerfassung: Eine erweiterte Form der Symlog- Interaktionskodierung als Beobachtungssystem -- 4. Methoden der Datenanalyse -- III: Empirie -- 5. Methodologische Voniberlegungen zur prozeßorientierten Klein- gnippenforschung: Einzelfalldiagnostik zwischen aristotelischer und galileischer Denkweise -- 6. Gruppeninteraktionsprozesse bei unterschiedlichen Aufgabenstellungen -- 7. Gruppenstruktur und Interaktionsprozeß -- 8. Übergreifende Analyse von Interaktionsmustern in Diskussionsgruppen -- 9. Abschlußdiskussion und Ausblick -- Anhang A: Programmsystem "SASKIA" zur "Sequentiellen Analyse mit Symlog kodierter Interaktionen" -- Anhang B: Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollenvorstellungen -- Anhang C: Material zur Gruppendiskussion 2: Charakterisierung der vier Bewerber.

Methods for the analysis of group processes at the behavioral and content level of social interaction are demonstrated using group interactions in conflict situations. A conceptual framework for behavioral strategies in conflict interactions is presented. Index variables for these strategies are defined on the basis of sequential interaction patterns. An experimental study is conducted on how interaction strategies in conflict situations vary with aspects of group composition. Four groups with two male and two female members each were formed varying the dimensions "gender" and "attitudes toward the male and female gender role" (traditional versus progressive). The groups were given a discussion task in which the differences in attitudes create a conflict situation. An analysis of interaction strategies indicated a more pronounced polarization in subgroups in the first condition. A detailed single case study illustrates the diagnostic power of the analytic methods in revealing different strategies of conflict management.

This study investigates how the regulation of interaction on the performative level (types and functions of interactions) and the referential level (relations of concepts) varies depending on the modality of communication: face-to-face, synchronous, and asynchronous text-based computer-mediated communication. In the experimental setting, six groups consisting of four experts cooperated per one of the three modalities in planning a marketing campaign for solar energy systems. The communication transcripts were analyzed on the performative level by SYMLOG. On the referential level, a network analysis was established to examine how relevant concepts were introduced in the discussion. The group output was measured with regard to group work, satisfaction, and performance. The results show that all communication modalities differ on the performative and on the referential level. No differences between the modalities were found regarding group work and satisfaction of the members. Group performance was judged better in face-to-face than in computer-mediated groups.